I wish you luck with that, I honestly do. However, they have already changed armor in the other direction so Idk how it'll go for you.
Redguard they did this
Orc they did this
Neither of which was an improvement in a lot of players opinions (do a search, you'll see)
Schnuffles wrote: »I feel like this forum is not viewed as much as it should be. They want players to come back to play but they don't want to give us what we want.
...and those who did wear "skimpy leather" all too often ended up conquered by those who wore proper armor. See history of the roman empire. Since "getting in the way" (of enemy blows) kinda is the whole point...Too many people are afraid of skin showing,as if it is *** or something.In reality many people wore rather skimpy leather armor,as it were,back in the day.Reasoning? It wouldnt get in the way during battle. Not everyone had metal armor.
Schnuffles wrote: »I feel like this forum is not viewed as much as it should be. They want players to come back to play but they don't want to give us what we want.
I once commented that you can please some of the people some of the time,but you cant please all of the people all of the time.
TheShadowScout wrote: »...and those who did wear "skimpy leather" all too often ended up conquered by those who wore proper armor. See history of the roman empire. Since "getting in the way" (of enemy blows) kinda is the whole point...
The "realism within the constraints of the game setting" argument is very important to some people; that's what drew a great many people to TES games in the first place after all. And some arguments never become played out, because they stay valid.Schnuffles wrote: »The realisim argument is old and played out. Its a video game where Dragons witches and zombies exist I really dont care about "well that armor isnt protective, blah blah"
Ok so i'll just chalk it up so some kind of enchantment or ward.
Applying realism to this game is just plain stupid. I play games to escape reality, I just want nice armor and costumes i can enjoy.
Point 1: The point of "realism" is stupid because it is abundantly clear that Elder Scrolls has since the beginning never had a qualm over the "the armor isnt realistic" argument.TheShadowScout wrote: »
I wish you luck with that, I honestly do. However, they have already changed armor in the other direction so Idk how it'll go for you.
Redguard they did this
Orc they did this
Neither of which was an improvement in a lot of players opinions (do a search, you'll see)
Astrids_fire wrote: »I vote YES to proposition Scantily Dress lol
Schnuffles wrote: »Realisim: Women would not have Boobs in heavy armor. That would make it exceptionally easy to crush said armor and kill the woman. so we need to flatten those chest peices while we are censoring everything else too.
Hows this for realism. none of the armor in the game is realistic. Leather armor is also not skin tight!
If everything were "realistic" we would all be running around in brown clunky tunics because armor was really not dyed or decorative unless it was ceremonial. and you would not be able to tell a male from a female at all! everyone would just be one gender neutral shape and helmets would cover everything.
Mmm yes a game where it doesn't matter what you look like because everyone looks the same.
the only separating features being your usernames
Sounds like fun right?
Stop already with the realism.
I want options. Its a game based on a fantasy world where just about anything is possible and i should think more revealing clothing options based off ALREADY CANON armor sets would be the least of your worries
No one is asking for there to be light sabers or wookie costumes. This request is withing the realm of what is feasible