Should the ESO forums bring back the LOL reactions?

Muizer

No. (Explain below)

Zazaaji wrote: »

Muizer BBSooner
As the poll says, please explain why you voted for "No". I'd really like to hear someone's reason for voting that way. I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

EDIT: Removed the calls. ZoS answered.

According to an older poll, the split between people using lol for something funny and people using it as a sign of ridicule was about 50/50. In specific instances it was usually possible to tell which is which, but it did make the totals meaningless. If you really like a joke, why not use "awesome"?

timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO

No. (Explain below)

All xp are to easy - The game are for kids when it comes to the xp gain.

MornaBaine

pugyourself wrote: »

MornaBaine wrote: »

It's interesting that they'll so seriously attend to abuses on the forums and yet have an utterly inadequate system for dealing with in-game trolling of people following you around spamming spells and jumping in your face and refusing to leave you alone, doing their best to disrupt your game experience.

If this happens to you often then you are probably doing something to instigate it.

Dude it happens to people at RP events ALL THE TIME. If roleplaying in an MMORPG (note the last 3 letters there) means I and many others are "instigating" it I think people fail to understand what game they are playing.

Talrenos

I don't care/Wait and See/Casual observer

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

Translation: Feel free to waste your time to discuss something trivial that totally takes you away from the real issues the game has.

Psychobunni

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Talrenos wrote: »

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

Translation: Feel free to waste your time to discuss something trivial that totally takes you away from the real issues the game has.

Normally my frustration comes through my comments as well. However, this OP was specifically forum oriented and a perfect place for a forum mod to actually answer. 95% of the stuff on the forums the mods can't answer or likely shouldn't.... more akin to asking the receptionist to answer your health questions at the Drs office.

Doesn't make us less frustrated as players with the state of the game, I know but this was at least within the capacity of what the forum mods do.

Robotmafia

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

The LOL tag was sometimes abused, which is why it was removed. For example, people would LOL posts they disagreed with, and on some occasions would systematically LOL all recent posts by a particular member. While far from heavy trolling, it was misused like this with a fair frequency, and occasionally contributed to escalating tensions or other problems. These issues eventually outweighed any good it was contributing, which is why we decided to remove it.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

how about adding the LOL flag and adding a disagree flag.. that would atleast solve one of these issues

oops sorry didn't see the 2nd post

Animal_Mother

RSram wrote: »

The reason they removed it was because of trolling where a player would post something serious and another player would respond with a LOL, just to get a response from the OP. In the age of Internet bullying, I think LOL was removed to prevent a player from getting offended. I personally don't care one way or another.

We live in a politically correct world.

I was never offended with any of the LOLs I received and encouraged others to do the same. The forums, being optional would be a hard place to bully/troll others - but in game, bullying and trolling happen all the time, yet ZOS doesn't seem to do much to curb it.

Sotha_Sil

Are you insane, Arena25? Do you need see a psychologist? (Explain below)

I just wanted to vote that because no one else did... and I found it appropriate on a LOL thread discussion.

BBSooner

No. (Explain below)

Islyn wrote: »

BBSooner wrote: »

Islyn wrote: »

BBSooner wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

The LOL tag was sometimes abused, which is why it was removed. For example, people would LOL posts they disagreed with, and on some occasions would systematically LOL all recent posts by a particular member. While far from heavy trolling, it was misused like this with a fair frequency, and occasionally contributed to escalating tensions or other problems. These issues eventually outweighed any good it was contributing, which is why we decided to remove it.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

@ZOS_AlanG
You just confirmed exactly what @PKMN12 said, thank you. I shall share my opinion with you too: Why not add a "LOL" button again, but along with a new actual "Disagree" button? If one member is found abusing the "Disagree" button, maybe there can be some method to ban them from using any of those buttons? Let's face it, if they'll abuse a "Disagree" button, they'll likely abuse "Agree", "Insightful", or "Awesome" too.

Without a disagree button, a person who disagrees is more likely to partake in a discussion as opposed to simply clicking "disagree" and move on. This behavior is fine for people who agree, since no difference in opinion exists.

No - we really aren't because some of us are concerned that anything we say will be taken as baiting/trolling some kind of thing if we don't say it all pink and sparkly - even if the OP or the comment we disagree with was utterly rude.

As long as the moderation is so utterly inconsistent I am not going to be bothered with writing out a statement in response to a ridiculous post which is stupid, whiny or both.

I will answer you (even to disagree) because your comment has nothing that will force me to have to be blatantly honest in my disagreement and the reason/s for it - and then get nabbed by mods if I call a duck a duck. ;-)

I've openly disagreed with many posts on the forums. To insinuate that disagreement is grounds for moderation is silly. Your only requirement is that you aren't abusive with your response - which isn't an extraordinary feat to abide by.

I didn't insinuate anything I flat out stated it as fact because it is a fact - but we are not allowed to discuss moderations on the forums as this is against the rules too so I cannot even post proof of it without getting warned or even banned. I have over 550 'agrees' and it is not because I am talking rubbish here.

I do not trust the moderation here. End of.

Think whatever you like.

Regardless of an arbitrary number of 'agrees', it doesn't make an opinion a fact. If the simple act of disagreement indeed was grounds for moderation then not only would we have been moderated thus far for disagreeing with eachother, but the people in this thread would have been moderated for disagreeing with @ZOS_AlanG . Thus it falls to 'how' you disagree being important when a post is weighed - which is not a bad thing. You can hold whatever opinion you'd like of the moderation, but to play that off as fact is intentionally misleading.

Tandor

No. (Explain below)

Nyghthowler wrote: »

If people get their feelings hurt because someone laughs at them or gets disagreed with on the internet, then they should find some other hobby such as solitaire or rock collecting.
IMO we need a LoL, Disagree, Strongly Disagree, and You're a Moron button. Encouraging stupidity for politeness sake just encourages stupidity.

(edit: spelling)

Past experience here suggests that it's the presence of such buttons that would encourage stupidity.

What is it about the internet that makes it so that if someone says something someone else disagrees with or finds silly they can't just make a brief constructive reply and move on? Why the need to have things like a "You're a moron" button to press? It tells us far more about the person pressing the button than it does about the initial poster.

Wintersage

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

I miss all the old buttons. Not just LOL, or disagree, but also the "Troll" and "Spam" buttons.

Just so long as people's posts aren't hidden. That, I have a problem with.

More buttons to press, I say!

Hlaadriel

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

arena25 wrote: »

Heromofo wrote: »

Fun fact: 57% of all statistics are made up.

and here I thought it was only 47.68% of stats that where made up... Will set up a poll

Emma_Overload

Muizer wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

Muizer BBSooner
As the poll says, please explain why you voted for "No". I'd really like to hear someone's reason for voting that way. I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

EDIT: Removed the calls. ZoS answered.

According to an older poll, the split between people using lol for something funny and people using it as a sign of ridicule was about 50/50. In specific instances it was usually possible to tell which is which, but it did make the totals meaningless. If you really like a joke, why not use "awesome"?

"...but it did make the totals meaningless."

I think you've just stumbled onto the heart of the LOL/Disagree button issue!

See, the problem here isn't the buttons - the problem is that ZoS decided to "gamify" the comment system. There is not now nor was there ever a REAL problem caused people clicking on Disagree or LOL or whatever. The problem is that ZoS cares more about maintaining the sanctity of the forum "badge" mini-game than they do about making the forum a functional tool for players to communicate with each other clearly.

LOL, this is what happens when you let a bunch of game devs design a forum! They should have outsourced the whole thing to DISQUS so people could speak clearly and freely and mod comments up or down at their pleasure.

smokes

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

a disagree option would be more useful.

if i can agree, i should be able to disagree too, some people have some weird ideas of what they think the community want

generally LOL was used to disagree with people or mock their idea, so just give us a disagree.

EQBallzz

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

The LOL tag was sometimes abused, which is why it was removed. For example, people would LOL posts they disagreed with, and on some occasions would systematically LOL all recent posts by a particular member. While far from heavy trolling, it was misused like this with a fair frequency, and occasionally contributed to escalating tensions or other problems. These issues eventually outweighed any good it was contributing, which is why we decided to remove it.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

Maybe if there was a "disagree" or "downvote" type option people wouldn't feel the need to use ironic reactions. Bring back LOL and add a proper negative reaction because not all reactions are positive so why force it?

UrQuan

timborggrenlarsenb16_ESO wrote: »

All xp are to easy - The game are for kids when it comes to the xp gain.

OK, so with all this discussion about the LOL button and a Disagree button, I think we've lost track of what's really important. Where's the "wat" button?

EQBallzz

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Obscure wrote: »

...why such a system to begin with?

Is "Like" and "Dislike" too simplistic? Either more options or two options is how I see it.

"Upvote" or "Downvote" is fine.

"LOL" "DISAGREE" "AGREE" "INSIGHTFUL" "AWESOME" "CONCERNING" "BRUTAL" "DISGUSTING" "ENTERTAINING" "KIND" "APPRECIATED" "SAD" or even "L2P" are all valid responses to a post.

What's with the candy land "let's just be positive guuuys. OK guuuuys. Just be nice guuuuuys. We don't want to be meanies guuuuuuys."


...these forums could use a bit more *** and vinegar... I get that not everyone has as thick of skin as others, and some folks take the things they get in response personally, or a bit too seriously, but defacto removing the "LOL" button is just plain baby proofing. I'm not saying I do not respect moderator staff making the call to do so, there house their rules, I'm merely saying the lack of a negative feedback option in general basically invalidates having a positive one. Oh yay, you have 500 agrees...never mind if there was a Disagree option you'd have 5000 of those.

...thinking of what the little notification message would say for 5000 Disagrees; "Yeah, maybe you should just, like, stop...like seriously... burn your keyboard."

Any who I'm all for bringing back ALL OF THE BUTTONS

Yeah, I don't get this at all. It's not like anyone can truly "troll" you with reactions. Each person gets ONE reaction per post. If that person wants to use "disagree" or "LOL" on every post they read..so be it. It's one vote but it's their vote so who cares. If there were more options..including some negative reactions..it would be much harder to abuse the reactions with "ironic snark" (like that's something so horrible anyway). I would think the mods have more pressing business than monitoring LOL reactions..like suspending/muting people every 5 minutes for no reason?

Faugaun

Are you insane, Arena25? Do you need see a psychologist? (Explain below)

Voted this because the response entertained me! Nice poll BTW

EQBallzz

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Dru1076 wrote: »

pugyourself wrote: »

This is what "Insightful" is for.

I don' get why people want to be able negatively flag a post so badly. You can still laugh at people and be negative, you just cant do it anonymously.

If you want to express your disapproval by using insightful, feel free to troll my posts as much as you like.

Yeah, they don't want you to do it anonymously. They prefer you post your disapproval so they can ban you instead.

Cogo

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

The LOL tag was sometimes abused, which is why it was removed. For example, people would LOL posts they disagreed with, and on some occasions would systematically LOL all recent posts by a particular member. While far from heavy trolling, it was misused like this with a fair frequency, and occasionally contributed to escalating tensions or other problems. These issues eventually outweighed any good it was contributing, which is why we decided to remove it.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

I had over 2000 LoLs and cherish them all! Give them back to me!

golfer.dub17_ESO

No. (Explain below)

Lookstowindwards wrote: »

Yeah, they don't want you to do it anonymously. They prefer you post your disapproval so they can ban you instead.

Well look at me, I haven't been banned for disapproving of this thread.

You can disapprove of something without being insulting or immature. "LOL UR AN IDIOT" button has no constructive value and really does say more about you than it does a poster.

People are accused of being sensitive for not wanting their posts tagged with LOL. Well how sensitive and insecure in your position do you have to be to go around spamming LOL at every opinion you simply disagree with?

c0rp

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Too bad ZoS spends so much time tracking what people are using what forum buttons for what users... instead of launching new content in a game that has become completely stagnant for 6 months running now...

If someone cant handle the fact they got an "LOL" on their post, they better just stop getting on the internet.

UrQuan

c0rp wrote: »

Too bad ZoS spends so much time tracking what people are using what forum buttons for what users... instead of launching new content in a game that has become completely stagnant for 6 months running now...

Yeah, because we all know that community managers and mods are devs!

arena25

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Moonshadow66 wrote: »

Not sure if this was suggested before (so many postings here), but how about a "Thank You" button?

Yes please. This might work well with questions.

arena25

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Lookstowindwards wrote: »

I would like to see it back. I'm also not sure, it one can say it was abusing, when using it as a "disagree button", as we did not have one.

So, if ZOS doesnt want the people to use "lol" as "disagree" - give us a "disagree"! Beside: Even if they dont want to give us the "lol" back, I want a "disagree".

We arent in kindergarten anymore, let us show, if we dont agree with a posting. And if some are trolling, punish the trolls, not the whole community, by generating an artificial cloud-cuckoo-land in pink, where all love each other and have the same opinion and all opinions are equaly valid, gnnnn...

And no: not all people want to write an answer to a posting they disagree with: not all of us have the time, beside: if english isnt your mothers tongue, a good reply takes even longer. And there is no guarantee that people will actually read up to the replies which tell why a posting is wrong, so having a disagree button would also help the readers of this forum.

just my two cent

Again, some people are big boys physically, but not mentally. Remember that our minds aren't fully developed until age 25.

bloodenragedb14_ESO

No. (Explain below)

the "lol" is actually more of a derogatory tag, people would "lol" at a person's idiocy or lack of knowledge.

if you want to appreciate someones humor, just hit the awsome tag, better and less negative

Cinbri

I don't care/Wait and See/Casual observer

didnt use this button anyway. ^^

Jeremy

No. (Explain below)

ZOS_AlanG wrote: »

Zazaaji wrote: »

@Muizer @BBSooner
I see no downside to adding it back, but fear I might be overlooking something.

The LOL tag was sometimes abused, which is why it was removed. For example, people would LOL posts they disagreed with, and on some occasions would systematically LOL all recent posts by a particular member. While far from heavy trolling, it was misused like this with a fair frequency, and occasionally contributed to escalating tensions or other problems. These issues eventually outweighed any good it was contributing, which is why we decided to remove it.

At the moment we aren't considering a return of the LOL flag. However, we certainly don't mind discussion of bringing it back.

This was exactly the problem and why it shouldn't be brought back. It was being used as a way for players to retaliate against one another. It added nothing of value to this forum.

If you want to lol a post you still can. Simply quote the post you find humorous and then type lol.

I am sorry for those who lost a convenient way to denigrate posts. Well, actually I am not.

Ourorboros

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

Did people abuse the LOL button? Without doubt. Did EVERYONE abuse it? No. So why remove the option for everyone because of the actions of some? Besides, removing the LOL button hasn't really change the behavior that caused it's removal. The first thing people did was decide 'insightful' was the new LOL. And did it really matter that much if people did abuse it? It was a number on a screen, no one was hurt. If feelings got hurt, that sounds like a personal issue way beyond the scope of the forum. It is just not the same using the awesome button for a truly funny post. Bring back the LOL!

Ley

YES! I wish I could give appreciation for people's humor.

I really don't see the harm in having disagree and lol buttons, so what if people hand them out liberally? If they had both options, maybe lol would be used more as intended and less as a substitute for a disagree button. I don't understand this care-bear community, where people can't handle negative feedback.