You make a really good point here (bolded for emphasis). It looks like the majority of the community in this poll will gladly give ZOS money hand over fist to change their race after ZOS "rebalanced" racial passives. That only encourages them to keep "rebalancing" since it'll be such a good income source for them.dodgehopper_ESO wrote: »Alphashado wrote: »Something tells me that the vast majority of people using the "wow you are too lazy to roll another character" argument are below level 50 and have no idea what they are talking about.
I do want to reply to this one Alpha. I understand the discomfort and irritation players feel about racial balance. Like I've said before, I was hit by the Argonian Nightblade Alchemist potion build nerfs of TU/1.6. I've felt the annoyance at game system changes that utterly change the way a character operates (2hander and elemental buffs for sorcs or dk's. Changes to Surge, etc). I'm not unfamiliar with these annoyances, but I think we need to consider the big picture here as consumers. While I understand the desire to want to correct flaws in your character, produced by the game developers changing things at a whim, I think the greater concern is that we are offering to pay them for breaking the game. We are in situations like this actually asking them to break the game, so we can pay them to break the game some more, so we can pay them more to break the game. I for one have no desire to reroll a nightblade to vet 14, just to play a more favorable race. I understand that. Simultaneously, I don't want to pay them for screwing up my Argonian. I want them to fix my Argonian. I made an argonian for a reason, both stylistic and statistical.
This is why I keep saying that I'd rather they did away with passives if they're going to break builds. It bothers me to pay someone for doing a bad job.
Both are cosmetic and have no place in lore..
Yeah but it is not a T-rex.
If you learned in school how to comprehend simple sentences you would know this.
Which school taught you insulting people leads to them understanding your point of view? There´s something like reading between the lines which tells me that you´re the kind of guy who should start to get out and take a walk to get fresh air so that you can see things more relaxed again.
Let's be honest, the change of racial abilities make not more sense than when a character changes the race. So they shouldn't rebalance races too often, but whenever they do - yes, let us switch.
the funny thing is, the people who are against race change have already lost.
Let's be honest, the change of racial abilities make not more sense than when a character changes the race. So they shouldn't rebalance races too often, but whenever they do - yes, let us switch.
I agree that changing racials fundamentally doesn't make sense. I would prefer that they have one last stab at balancing them and then never touch them again. At that point I would probably accept a one time race change... but to include the mechanic as something a person could pick up at any time? I can't help but see that as a mistake as we now will be in the position of funding them for creating imbalanced, and ever changing, racials.
DaveMoeDee wrote: »And I doubt races could ever be really balanced without making them very similar.
ZOS has already said there WILL be race change in the game, possibly soon, and because it will make them money, it is likely coming soon and not soon(tm).