We used to debate this a lot back in beta, and a common argument was "EP wins because Tiber was a Nord".
My perspective is that I'd define 'winning' as having achieved the goals of that faction. EP wants autonomy for each province. AD wants an elven empire. DC wants a human empire.
Remind me what actually ended up happening? Oh, a human empire, right. DC wins.
Considering Tiber's rise came at the cost of both an invasion of Morrowind against the Dunmer as well as an invasion of Hammerfell over the Redguards I'd say neither EP nor DC had their interests served.
Septim ends up leading the Colovian Estates (another human empire but directly at war with DC), meaning, as far as the game is concerned, the NPCs essentially win the war. I would be hard pressed to say DC won for him conquering them (or EP for that matter).
More likely all the alliances collapse before Tiber's rise.
Erm, Tiber invaded basically *everything*. Hence the whole 'empire' thing.
Yes, I'm sure we're all aware that none of the alliances won in the end, but the point is that it was DC's *goals* that were met, in the end. I'd even go so far as to assume that the Covenant had been dissolved prior to Cuhlecain making his move out of Falkreath, or the doors of Sancre Tor would have been thrown wide open to receive him.
Even still, Tiber conquering the jarls and kings of Skyrim and High Rock doesn't make any faction a retroactive winner based on what their goals were, considering the nation's they were during his rise were conquered along with everybody else.
Besides, I'd say their goals - more than a human empire - would be that of a Breton emperor. Otherwise before the collapse they would have aligned themselves with the Colovians and attempted to put the imperials back on the throne if the only prerequisite was that "a human" be in charge.
Technically Talos is a breton but it depends on what you believe.
We used to debate this a lot back in beta, and a common argument was "EP wins because Tiber was a Nord".
My perspective is that I'd define 'winning' as having achieved the goals of that faction. EP wants autonomy for each province. AD wants an elven empire. DC wants a human empire.
Remind me what actually ended up happening? Oh, a human empire, right. DC wins.
Considering Tiber's rise came at the cost of both an invasion of Morrowind against the Dunmer as well as an invasion of Hammerfell over the Redguards I'd say neither EP nor DC had their interests served.
Septim ends up leading the Colovian Estates (another human empire but directly at war with DC), meaning, as far as the game is concerned, the NPCs essentially win the war. I would be hard pressed to say DC won for him conquering them (or EP for that matter).
More likely all the alliances collapse before Tiber's rise.
Erm, Tiber invaded basically *everything*. Hence the whole 'empire' thing.
Yes, I'm sure we're all aware that none of the alliances won in the end, but the point is that it was DC's *goals* that were met, in the end. I'd even go so far as to assume that the Covenant had been dissolved prior to Cuhlecain making his move out of Falkreath, or the doors of Sancre Tor would have been thrown wide open to receive him.
Even still, Tiber conquering the jarls and kings of Skyrim and High Rock doesn't make any faction a retroactive winner based on what their goals were, considering the nation's they were during his rise were conquered along with everybody else.
Besides, I'd say their goals - more than a human empire - would be that of a Breton emperor. Otherwise before the collapse they would have aligned themselves with the Colovians and attempted to put the imperials back on the throne if the only prerequisite was that "a human" be in charge.
Technically Talos is a breton but it depends on what you believe.
His race is unknown.
He is either a Breton that has convinced every nord he's ever met that he's a nord, or he's just a Nord who was born in Alcaire.
I prefer the explanation that doesn't have him somehow fooling an entire race of people.
Off-topic, but thankyou for demonstrating that the image tag still works. I assumed it had been removed when the functionality to insert it was removed from the UI.Question:
Who wins the Three Banners War?
Answer:TALOS
I can count to potato.
WWJLHD?Hypertionb14_ESO wrote: »another topic that cant see past its own farts.
We used to debate this a lot back in beta, and a common argument was "EP wins because Tiber was a Nord".
My perspective is that I'd define 'winning' as having achieved the goals of that faction. EP wants autonomy for each province. AD wants an elven empire. DC wants a human empire.
Remind me what actually ended up happening? Oh, a human empire, right. DC wins.
Considering Tiber's rise came at the cost of both an invasion of Morrowind against the Dunmer as well as an invasion of Hammerfell over the Redguards I'd say neither EP nor DC had their interests served.
Septim ends up leading the Colovian Estates (another human empire but directly at war with DC), meaning, as far as the game is concerned, the NPCs essentially win the war. I would be hard pressed to say DC won for him conquering them (or EP for that matter).
More likely all the alliances collapse before Tiber's rise.
Erm, Tiber invaded basically *everything*. Hence the whole 'empire' thing.
Yes, I'm sure we're all aware that none of the alliances won in the end, but the point is that it was DC's *goals* that were met, in the end. I'd even go so far as to assume that the Covenant had been dissolved prior to Cuhlecain making his move out of Falkreath, or the doors of Sancre Tor would have been thrown wide open to receive him.
Even still, Tiber conquering the jarls and kings of Skyrim and High Rock doesn't make any faction a retroactive winner based on what their goals were, considering the nation's they were during his rise were conquered along with everybody else.
Besides, I'd say their goals - more than a human empire - would be that of a Breton emperor. Otherwise before the collapse they would have aligned themselves with the Colovians and attempted to put the imperials back on the throne if the only prerequisite was that "a human" be in charge.
Technically Talos is a breton but it depends on what you believe.
His race is unknown.
He is either a Breton that has convinced every nord he's ever met that he's a nord, or he's just a Nord who was born in Alcaire.
I prefer the explanation that doesn't have him somehow fooling an entire race of people.
He's none of the mortal races, he's a divine. This was proven when his armour was obtained for a component of the ritual in the Mysterium Xarxes which required the blood of a divine to enter Mankar Cameron's Paradise.
Breton are simply Nord mixed with mer blood, and this racial ancestry is equally irrelevant to Talos who has divine blood. Breton? Nord? Nope. Aedroth, a fact that really really pisses off the elves of Summerset who consider the Aedra sacred ancestors.
We used to debate this a lot back in beta, and a common argument was "EP wins because Tiber was a Nord".
My perspective is that I'd define 'winning' as having achieved the goals of that faction. EP wants autonomy for each province. AD wants an elven empire. DC wants a human empire.
Remind me what actually ended up happening? Oh, a human empire, right. DC wins.
Considering Tiber's rise came at the cost of both an invasion of Morrowind against the Dunmer as well as an invasion of Hammerfell over the Redguards I'd say neither EP nor DC had their interests served.
Septim ends up leading the Colovian Estates (another human empire but directly at war with DC), meaning, as far as the game is concerned, the NPCs essentially win the war. I would be hard pressed to say DC won for him conquering them (or EP for that matter).
More likely all the alliances collapse before Tiber's rise.
Erm, Tiber invaded basically *everything*. Hence the whole 'empire' thing.
Yes, I'm sure we're all aware that none of the alliances won in the end, but the point is that it was DC's *goals* that were met, in the end. I'd even go so far as to assume that the Covenant had been dissolved prior to Cuhlecain making his move out of Falkreath, or the doors of Sancre Tor would have been thrown wide open to receive him.
Even still, Tiber conquering the jarls and kings of Skyrim and High Rock doesn't make any faction a retroactive winner based on what their goals were, considering the nation's they were during his rise were conquered along with everybody else.
Besides, I'd say their goals - more than a human empire - would be that of a Breton emperor. Otherwise before the collapse they would have aligned themselves with the Colovians and attempted to put the imperials back on the throne if the only prerequisite was that "a human" be in charge.
Technically Talos is a breton but it depends on what you believe.
His race is unknown.
He is either a Breton that has convinced every nord he's ever met that he's a nord, or he's just a Nord who was born in Alcaire.
I prefer the explanation that doesn't have him somehow fooling an entire race of people.
He's none of the mortal races, he's a divine. This was proven when his armour was obtained for a component of the ritual in the Mysterium Xarxes which required the blood of a divine to enter Mankar Cameron's Paradise.
Breton are simply Nord mixed with mer blood, and this racial ancestry is equally irrelevant to Talos who has divine blood. Breton? Nord? Nope. Aedroth, a fact that really really pisses off the elves of Summerset who consider the Aedra sacred ancestors.
While it's true he (Tiber) mantled Lorkhan (and depending on the lore you follow he is or at least is 1/3 of the deity Talos), I think that would fulfill the prerequisite for the divine blood, as he could have done the mantling while wearing the armor and left behind a touch of divinity.
Hjalti, though, is where the racial ambiguity lies. And though Bretons may have Nedic ancestors, there is clearly a racial difference. Otherwise the same could be said that Dunmer are really just Altmer since they share the same ancestors.
The Dominion you see in Skyrim is the Third Aldmeri Dominion. The one we have in ESO is the First, and that won't last beyond Ayrenn. By 2E 830, the First Dominion has long since collapsed, as that is the founding year of the Second Dominion.Kingof green wrote: »Aldmeri Dominion seems to be the most likely because if you look from a lore prospective point, the dagger fall covenant falls when "High" King Emeric dies, the Pact seems to fall because there to divided and Dark wolfs end up reslaveing the Argornians not so long after the events of Three banner war. But the Dominion, 1000years on are at its greatest extent if you've played Skyrim the Dominion seem to be more power full then the 3rd Imperial Empire. With that all said it's fair to say that the Dominion seems like the winners here.
I'm inclined to believe they all collapse some time before 2E 800, and I can't see them being sustainable much beyond the deaths of their respective leaders; Emeric and Ayrenn seem to be integral to the success of DC and AD, with only EP having the potential to outlast them due to their Great Moot not relying on any leader in particular. None of them will win the Three Banners War though.
Someone will come riding a giant robot and conquering all Tamriel.
We used to debate this a lot back in beta, and a common argument was "EP wins because Tiber was a Nord".
My perspective is that I'd define 'winning' as having achieved the goals of that faction. EP wants autonomy for each province. AD wants an elven empire. DC wants a human empire.
Remind me what actually ended up happening? Oh, a human empire, right. DC wins.
They exist only in concept art and cinematic rendering...
ESO examples:
They just never put them in game...because coding cloaks is "haaaaaaaard"...
Ubisoft does it fine in Assassin's Creed...
We used to debate this a lot back in beta, and a common argument was "EP wins because Tiber was a Nord".
My perspective is that I'd define 'winning' as having achieved the goals of that faction. EP wants autonomy for each province. AD wants an elven empire. DC wants a human empire.
Remind me what actually ended up happening? Oh, a human empire, right. DC wins.
Considering Tiber's rise came at the cost of both an invasion of Morrowind against the Dunmer as well as an invasion of Hammerfell over the Redguards I'd say neither EP nor DC had their interests served.
Septim ends up leading the Colovian Estates (another human empire but directly at war with DC), meaning, as far as the game is concerned, the NPCs essentially win the war. I would be hard pressed to say DC won for him conquering them (or EP for that matter).
More likely all the alliances collapse before Tiber's rise.
Erm, Tiber invaded basically *everything*. Hence the whole 'empire' thing.
Yes, I'm sure we're all aware that none of the alliances won in the end, but the point is that it was DC's *goals* that were met, in the end. I'd even go so far as to assume that the Covenant had been dissolved prior to Cuhlecain making his move out of Falkreath, or the doors of Sancre Tor would have been thrown wide open to receive him.
Even still, Tiber conquering the jarls and kings of Skyrim and High Rock doesn't make any faction a retroactive winner based on what their goals were, considering the nation's they were during his rise were conquered along with everybody else.
Besides, I'd say their goals - more than a human empire - would be that of a Breton emperor. Otherwise before the collapse they would have aligned themselves with the Colovians and attempted to put the imperials back on the throne if the only prerequisite was that "a human" be in charge.
Technically Talos is a breton but it depends on what you believe.
His race is unknown.
He is either a Breton that has convinced every nord he's ever met that he's a nord, or he's just a Nord who was born in Alcaire.
I prefer the explanation that doesn't have him somehow fooling an entire race of people.
He's none of the mortal races, he's a divine. This was proven when his armour was obtained for a component of the ritual in the Mysterium Xarxes which required the blood of a divine to enter Mankar Cameron's Paradise.
Breton are simply Nord mixed with mer blood, and this racial ancestry is equally irrelevant to Talos who has divine blood. Breton? Nord? Nope. Aedroth, a fact that really really pisses off the elves of Summerset who consider the Aedra sacred ancestors.
Thevampirenight wrote: »Well, the dragonbreak that was created with the soul burst might have a key role in the birth of Talos the ninth divine.
With Three seperate timelines.
Hjalti Early-Beard was born in Highrock in the daggerfall timeline, the daggerfall convent did not really last most likly after king emerics death like someone said in a post above. He was most likly dragonborn but would never learn the thuum but would manage to take all of tamerial.
The ebenheart timeline, the pact mainly did not win or lose, in that time line, Talos came over here and was trained by the grey beards to use the thuum and was also dragonborn. He would manage to conquer all of tamerial as well.
Well, the ad timeline it existed for a while, and was successful and did not fall, but it did in the other two timelines it did fall, thus, when time was merged all back together, the affects where very damaging to them, the first dominion fell but the second one rose.
The two men so different from each other became one man, merged together by akatosh thus Tiber Septim was born.
He would manged to reunite all of tamerial together. Vivec gave him the Dwemer device because he knew it was needed to help undo the effects of the other timelines. Thus Tiber Septim wanted to most likly undo the damage, caused by the other dragonbreak, but the person that was powering it did not want him to erase people from existance thus it ended up destorying the golem once more. But in the proccess the use of the device, basically undid itself and repaired time, but also Made Talos the god, in the proccess. Confusing, but most likly what happened. Talos is the product of the dragonbreaks, that made him.
Thus he once was two people but became one person, and by becoming one person became one of the greatest emperors to ever live.