Arizona_Willie wrote: »What a shame.
ESO could be a great game.
I enjoyed it a lot but at a certain stage an AH become a necessity as far as I'm concerned.
I will NOT return until they have an Auction House.
Now I'm playing Dying Light.
Definitely no AH needed there
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
Mountain_Dewed wrote: »I don't understand why players have a hard time going to a kiosk and finding what they need? Rawl'kha alone probably has 99% of the stuff and the rest is well, just hard to get anyway but still not any harder if there was an AH. Maybe someone can explain...
Arizona_Willie wrote: »What a shame.
ESO could be a great game.
I enjoyed it a lot but at a certain stage an AH become a necessity as far as I'm concerned.
I will NOT return until they have an Auction House.
Now I'm playing Dying Light.
Definitely no AH needed there
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
That is not called supply and demand. You forget, in the real world there are multiple outlets. Much like in game come to think of it. And even on places such as Amazon, pricing is generally done with the idea of staying in business in mind, it's NOT a race to the bottom like it is with global AHs in mmos.
Just to add - if you'd like to see a global AH on a large server in action, looking at pricing in GW2.
Emma_Eunjung wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
That is not called supply and demand. You forget, in the real world there are multiple outlets. Much like in game come to think of it. And even on places such as Amazon, pricing is generally done with the idea of staying in business in mind, it's NOT a race to the bottom like it is with global AHs in mmos.
Just to add - if you'd like to see a global AH on a large server in action, looking at pricing in GW2.
Yes, there are mutliple outlets in the real world, millions of them, but it only takes me 30 seconds to search for the best deal on a Vizio TV, for example. Searching all the guild stores in Tamriel for the best deal on a Warlock ring takes HOURS.
See the difference?
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
That is not called supply and demand.
Emma_Eunjung wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
That is not called supply and demand. You forget, in the real world there are multiple outlets. Much like in game come to think of it. And even on places such as Amazon, pricing is generally done with the idea of staying in business in mind, it's NOT a race to the bottom like it is with global AHs in mmos.
Just to add - if you'd like to see a global AH on a large server in action, looking at pricing in GW2.
Yes, there are mutliple outlets in the real world, millions of them, but it only takes me 30 seconds to search for the best deal on a Vizio TV, for example. Searching all the guild stores in Tamriel for the best deal on a Warlock ring takes HOURS.
See the difference?
The guild stores themselves wouldn't be so bad if there was a way to search ALL stores at once, from a single location. Then maybe you could pay for the item ahead of time and go pick it up at the kiosk.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy. People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy. People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
Because this is utter bull crap. At the moment the economy hardly functions fir anything other than a few mats, potions and food.
New players can't find gear, trawling round zones looking fir what I needed is crap, finding recipes is nonsense.
It is currently utterly tedious, discouraging when trying to get crafting levelled or selling mats, crap for people trying to save for bank space, bags and horses.
It's a terrible idea, when one of the cornerstones of a currency based system is ease of trade.
They tried it. It doesn't work, something needs to change.
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
You have 5 guilds you can join, 5 hubs of people to keep in touch with. Other games, 1 guild, dwindling players
Here it keeps you intouch with people and if one guild gets to small for you, drop a note why AND JOIN ANOTHER!! Jesus, how lazy are some of these people ?
You have 5 guilds you can join, 5 hubs of people to keep in touch with giving you a restricted number of trading outlets scattered all over the world and that change from week to week. Other games, 1 guild, dwindling players and a single world-wide unrestricted trading system
Here it keeps you intouch with people and if one guild gets to small for you, drop a note why AND JOIN ANOTHER!! Jesus, how lazy are some of these people ?
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
I think it does end up breaking the economy. Supply and demand is not the end all beat all. With as little "regulation" as game mechanics allow for it's too ez for die-hard traders to "corner" markets when they have access to all possible supply with the click of a button. The current system simulates a real world economy better by input of geographic limitations. Your proposed system would make it WAY too easy for collusion among trading guilds to abuse the system AND THEY WOULD. See it in every MMO with a global system. ZoS's approach is a good middle ground for keeping traders honest and prices decent for the time and effort involved.
Don't try to minimize the supporters of the current system. We've seen this topic go on for over a year and the community support for the current system is overwhelmingly in our favor. I guarantee you there are more than a "couple" of people as you say that support the current system and REJECT the Lais ez Faire approach you pose for a global system.
This system breaks up the monopoly before it happens. That's why guilds are limited in size and access to goods are limited through location. The addons available that crunch number from guild sales is all the global access we really need. Subsequently prices are not "artificially inflated" because we can see what they are trading for across the board. Prices tend to be relative to location, the better locations bringing higher prices due to convenience and foot traffic.
Besides, I like the rat race of searching items and deals through vendor hopping. With the addon "awesome guild trader" it makes the experience even better so I don't have to retype my search anew with every vendor I visit.
The question I have for you is this. Why on Earth would I risk the satisfaction I and many others have with the current system on that which you propose? Since I seem to have as much access to goods as I need. I find whatever I'm looking for at a price that are typically agreeable. Sometimes the prices are high but usually due to location and I can move on to the next cart if I chose to do so. Other times I find great deals. Why change it if the system is actually working for me as a consumer?
If I could find all the Kiosks in 20 minutes maybe it would be okay. If there was a market place that would be different.
This system is terrible. I have said it before and I'll say it again. Terrible.
If I could find all the Kiosks in 20 minutes maybe it would be okay. If there was a market place that would be different.
These Kiosks are only good for select people. Not everybody can earn 5 mil gold of their natural talents. Not everyone has the time to search through the Kiosks to buy and sell so well.
These Kiosks are hard to find and not every guild has one.
If I could find all the Kiosks in 20 minutes maybe it would be okay. If there was a market place that would be different.
Maybe have it where you press m for the map, and one of the icons is for the traders. Which would show every trader and let you port there the way we can with dungeons. But that might be too easy for Z.
Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »So Ashy, what are your thoughts on an AH thenlol
I'm so tired of prooving why AH will kill all economic in game. Tired of providing links to ZOS's posts. It's even not funny anymore, it's rather sad. Sad that people think that no need to check previous discussion. Sad that they are too lazy and too unwise to keep this place constructive and civilian. Sad that most people don't use search tool and asking the same questions over and over and over and over and over again. This topic it totally useless.
I think you mean "sad that they hold a different opinion to you".
The OP is right. The guild store system does not provide an effective means of public trading, and its retention is only sought by those who belong to the guilds that corner the market in kiosks. Well, the rest of us would quite like to be able to sell stuff too, and have a lot less hassle finding the other stuff that we want to buy. Whether it's an AH or some other form of public trading, there needs to be a better system than the one we have currently. That's why it's an issue that comes up so frequently.
@Tandor nope, I'm absoultely fine if someone have different opinion. It make you to look different on the same question.Drachenfier wrote: »AshySamurai wrote: »
I have yet to see a single shred of proof to support this claim. Ever. I was big on this AH argument back at launch, and all I saw were nonsensical assertions and straw man arguments as reasons not to have one.
Auction House choose any link you want.
I don't see anything in any of those links to give evidence that auction houses ruin economies. What I do see is a bunch of people that want to corner markets without competition arguing against having them. Letting supply and demand do what it does naturally is a good thing. Artificially inducing inflated prices by limiting market access is a bad thing.
There are now 142 Guild traders in Tamriel (126 from before + 16 new ones in Outlaw Refuges). I don't see how anyone can "corner the market" in that set up.
What's the point then, of segregating the markets? If "so many guild traders" are readily available, then just centralize it and call it a day.
Why keep asking the same bloody question? You've heard why centralising is a bad idea. It breaks the economy.
No. it. does. not.
You and a couple others claiming it does over and over doesn't make it true.People undercut one another until there's absolutely nothing left, crafters are unable to make their money back, regular players are unable to make decent gold and STILL the best items get jacked up in price - leaving an entire population with little gold and no way to afford to buy the best stuff.
That's called supply and demand, killer, simple economics. Artificially inflating prices due to limited access does not "make a good economy".
That is not called supply and demand.
It isYour complaint about prices being driven down by oversaturation is exactly the fundamental basis for how supply and demand works. Rare items are expensive, common items are not....Until you are able to artificially inflate the prices of common items by reducing market access, thereby making them less common, which is what we have in ESO. That doesn't really help anyone, because buyers end up paying more than they should, and sellers have less buyers to begin with.