no offense, but we already have 18 PvE zones, we don't need more PvE. its time for PvP to get the attention it deserves.
idk how to help you though. we are getting a.... wrothgar, I believe it was called, later on? that is supposed to be a PvE zone
no offense, but we already have 18 PvE zones, we don't need more PvE. its time for PvP to get the attention it deserves.
idk how to help you though. we are getting a.... wrothgar, I believe it was called, later on? that is supposed to be a PvE zone
You may like PvP, but many do not. I already know 3 people that have cancelled because of boredom, and I suspect many others have as well. Look at the diminishing people in most zones
I have played ESO since "Arena", through the problems of "Daggerfall", etc. Guess what, those were all PvE games, which is where most of the fan base comes from.
diminishing people? in the veteran zones maybe..... its like that because most people, once hitting VR1, go grind to max rank in craglorn: 75% of this playerbase does not give a crap about PvE zones after VR1(some don't care in the first place).
PvE has gotten enough attention: time to give PvP its turn..
once PvP has finally had its turn(which it will soon thankfully) then we should(in my opinion) go back to doing PvE stuff.
im just getting tired of going to cyrodill and crashing half the time. im tired of all of the bugs in PvP, all of the cheating: the imbalances.... me, and many others, are sick of things like this... being swept under the rug for more PvE that, honestly, at this point, is not needed. we have 18 PvE zones, we don't need more PvE.
that was not exactly brief......... ah well.
WraithAzraiel wrote: »You might want to edit that above post, it's awful sloppy and very hard to read.
There is plenty of PvE content, if you know 3 people that already left well that's their problem.
They sped through the content available, again their problem.
You want more PvE content? Watch that video, read those notes. It's coming.
Question really should be, will the impatient "I want an Oomba-Loomba NOW, DADDY!!" players be here to see it?
Patience is a virtue.
To answer your question, yes, there is new pve content coming.
The guild summit streams give more details as to "what".
In the meantime maybe try out some acheivements or give some of the group content another go. There's many types of group content and some may surprise you
WraithAzraiel wrote: »You might want to edit that above post, it's awful sloppy and very hard to read.
There is plenty of PvE content, if you know 3 people that already left well that's their problem.
They sped through the content available, again their problem.
You want more PvE content? Watch that video, read those notes. It's coming.
Question really should be, will the impatient "I want an Oomba-Loomba NOW, DADDY!!" players be here to see it?
Patience is a virtue.
Sorry about the sloppy post, I tried to answered him point by point, unfortunately I know of no way to separate segments of the other quote. I tried to clean it up a bit.
Apparently you misread my original post. I was asking if new PvE content was in the works in the PvE discussion thread. As often happens on these forums, you get some PvP guy foaming at the mouth. I tried to answer him reasonably.
In your original post you said something about "Lie there, all your answers do."
I thought the comment was directed at the other reply; if not, care to point out where "all my lies" are.
But...update 5 is already on PTS? New vet dungeon, dungeon scaling, undaunted/crafting quests? That seems like a looooooot of PvE stuff to me, can't wait to try it out.
rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »In other words.. just go back to Skyrim already.
no offense, but we already have 18 PvE zones, we don't need more PvE. its time for PvP to get the attention it deserves.
idk how to help you though. we are getting a.... wrothgar, I believe it was called, later on? that is supposed to be a PvE zone
You may like PvP, but many do not. I already know 3 people that have cancelled because of boredom, and I suspect many others have as well. Look at the diminishing people in most zones
I have played ESO since "Arena", through the problems of "Daggerfall", etc. Guess what, those were all PvE games, which is where most of the fan base comes from.
bellanca6561n wrote: »Everyone keeps dancing around it or getting into dueling tastes.
Point is that the 50 million people who bought Skyrim, and goodness knows how many purchasing installments in this franchise for two decades, enjoy single player games.
They got that experience here too. They want more of it. They pay the same money as the folks who enjoy multiplayer. If they don't get it, they'll leave and return when there is a complete refresh of that type of content.
Otherwise it's a television series that has been cancelled. Only reruns. Or some holidays specials.
They are not bad or stupid. They don't suffer from "not getting it" or any other such nonsense. Rather, they legitimately feel the victims of bait and switch. It makes no sense to this player that you can't reach the maximum level by questing IN YOUR FACTION and solo if you wish. Single player games are not released with such compromises.
MMO has outgrown its acronym. It was a stupid acronym to begin with. Now it's a meaningless one.
Ifthir_ESO wrote: »rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »In other words.. just go back to Skyrim already.
Attitudes like this are what is killing the game. It's why some guilds that used to raid every night now cant even field a 12 man team.
FWIW Skyrim currently has 10x the twitch viewers ESO does.
mousekime111rwb17_ESO wrote: »18 PVE zones eh... I'm sorry but I didn't realize that 3 trials, one arena and 7 VR dungeons added up to 18... or that they even collectively came close to matching the scale of cyrodiil.
rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »The problem with the OP's post is it is improperly titled. He wants new SOLO PvE content. Also, apparently, it seems that he doesn't believe that the people who do group PvE have any right on the PvE forum. In other words.. just go back to Skyrim already.
Ifthir_ESO wrote: »rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »In other words.. just go back to Skyrim already.
Attitudes like this are what is killing the game. It's why some guilds that used to raid every night now cant even field a 12 man team.
FWIW Skyrim currently has 10x the twitch viewers ESO does.
rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »The problem with the OP's post is it is improperly titled. He wants new SOLO PvE content. Also, apparently, it seems that he doesn't believe that the people who do group PvE have any right on the PvE forum. In other words.. just go back to Skyrim already.
I am glad you know what I want, even if it is wrong. I duo often and group on occasion. I was complaining about whining PvP players on this thread and nothing else.
I find it comical that if I don't agree with you, I should go to another game. You don't find PvE players telling others to go to GWs or some other PvP game.
As others have mentioned, Murkmire (Group PvE) and Wrothgar (Solo PvE) zones were announced at QuakeCon. Imperial City (PvP) was also announced at that time. I think, though, that for PvE they could also add more solo quests by recycling some zones and characters.Is there any plans to add new PvE content? I am on my third character, having taken a char to Vr12 and one to Vr11. I am really getting bored and am thinking I may have to just cancel my subscription. I do not have any desire to group most of the time and hate PvP.
rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »rashkosh127ub17_ESO wrote: »The problem with the OP's post is it is improperly titled. He wants new SOLO PvE content. Also, apparently, it seems that he doesn't believe that the people who do group PvE have any right on the PvE forum. In other words.. just go back to Skyrim already.
I am glad you know what I want, even if it is wrong. I duo often and group on occasion. I was complaining about whining PvP players on this thread and nothing else.
I find it comical that if I don't agree with you, I should go to another game. You don't find PvE players telling others to go to GWs or some other PvP game.
1. I am a purely PvE player, and therefore half of your post is misdirected.
2. You very clearly stated that you had no desire to group, so yes, it is very reasonable for me to assume that you want solo content.