@AshleyLee I'm curious as to whether ZOS believes what you mention as "broken" to be truly so. It appears they may be using the raw cost -- unmodified by gear, passives, etc. -- in determining the 50% penalty, and probably because they can't/won't account for every permutation/combination of skills/gear players may choose to use.
Just my $0.02, I could be wrong.
NaughtyDog wrote: »I am not sure what to say if this is true. I mean whats the point for asking ppl to test on PTS for them to report bugs, just for it to be ignored and pushed through patch away.
This makes me wonder about all the patches and skills lately xD.
Not the first time Zeni have pushed stuff onto the live servers knowing it was broken. Happened pre launch, happened pre Craglorn and its still happening. They seriously need to restructure who is in charge and who has final say BEFORE anything goes live.
NaughtyDog wrote: »I am not sure what to say if this is true. I mean whats the point for asking ppl to test on PTS for them to report bugs, just for it to be ignored and pushed through patch away.
This makes me wonder about all the patches and skills lately xD.
NaughtyDog wrote: »I am not sure what to say if this is true. I mean whats the point for asking ppl to test on PTS for them to report bugs, just for it to be ignored and pushed through patch away.
This makes me wonder about all the patches and skills lately xD.
Let me add to this discussion. There is a bug'd quest Welcome to Cyrodiil see this thread.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/107117/siege-warfare-quest-in-cyrodiil-bugged#latest
Now let me point you to this post.
http://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/discussion/107602/welcome-to-cyrodiil-bug#latest
Huh, reported this bug on the PTS.
Bug is now on Live Server.
at this point, I really don't care how they use their calculators.Is it possible that passives obtained by skill point allocation are not considered part of the applied cost? None of the examples given above have factored an outcome without them; but if they are (not?) a factor, might it explain the appearance of the supposed discrepancy?
Artemiisia wrote: »this is gonna be fun, now I can as a non bolt sorcerer user, finally kill the once that managed to slips away
Didn't get mad about it though, I just smiled at said to myself, it was there lucky day, and I didn't do a good enough job to cc them.
Artemiisia wrote: »this is gonna be fun, now I can as a non bolt sorcerer user, finally kill the once that managed to slips away
Didn't get mad about it though, I just smiled at said to myself, it was there lucky day, and I didn't do a good enough job to cc them.
so you like to exploit a exploit? gotcha.
at this point, I really don't care how they use their calculators.Is it possible that passives obtained by skill point allocation are not considered part of the applied cost? None of the examples given above have factored an outcome without them; but if they are (not?) a factor, might it explain the appearance of the supposed discrepancy?
just know its practically 100% increase as normal human would understand.