In this case it died years ago, just equip a shield and don't use it.Rastafariel wrote: »I sincerely hope a 1 handed weapon style is on the way, since they have forced people who used to be able to wield a 1 handed weapon and make use of the sword & board skill line to now be obsolete. I was a vocal critic of the fact that they did not have a 1 handed style in beta, but I let it pass and said hey, Ill take the hit to my ac for not using a shield, and I'll only use a few skills from the skill line. Now I have my swashbuckling sorcerer wielding a shield? No thanks.
Please give us news of the true 1 handed skill line. I can name a few movies with heroes that use a sword & shield. I can name hundreds of movies with heroes that simply use a sword.
What happened to playing my way?
The S&B is still the best weapon skill line in the game, Even if you are not using any of the actives the passives and the ability to block continuously beats anything the other skill lines have to offer.
Use shield for mitigation and use your class skills for damage.
The S&B is still the best weapon skill line in the game, Even if you are not using any of the actives the passives and the ability to block continuously beats anything the other skill lines have to offer.
Use shield for mitigation and use your class skills for damage.
Works ok for my Templar.
AlexDougherty wrote: »
Yes, Biting jabs then that fire ball ability, repeat the Biting jabs repeatedly, and when I need to whack them a few times with my weapon.Drachenfier wrote: »AlexDougherty wrote: »
Complete reliance on class skills in the most magicka consumptive class in the game works ok for you?
penguinlaraub17_ESO wrote: »The S&B is still the best weapon skill line in the game, Even if you are not using any of the actives the passives and the ability to block continuously beats anything the other skill lines have to offer.
Use shield for mitigation and use your class skills for damage.
No idea what came you are playing but blocking is a joke now, so much damage still leaks through. On top of that blocking cost so much stamina it's almost worthless unless you are blocking only charged attacks, and you better have about 25% stam to block those other wise game over.
In real life, actual dual wielding was extremely rare if it was used seriously at all. While a single sword wouldn't be used on the battlefield, at least it makes sense to be used in a spur-of-the-moment fight when one does.not have a shield on hand.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Unless you're fencing (you know, where there are rules to combat), there is generally no advantage to having just one weapon in one hand when you could have a shield or weapon in your off-hand.
Maverick827 wrote: »In real life, actual dual wielding was extremely rare if it was used seriously at all. While a single sword wouldn't be used on the battlefield, at least it makes sense to be used in a spur-of-the-moment fight when one does.not have a shield on hand.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Unless you're fencing (you know, where there are rules to combat), there is generally no advantage to having just one weapon in one hand when you could have a shield or weapon in your off-hand.
What they should do is make a 1H/Spell fighting style.
Two swords indeed were rare, or two full sized weapons of any type.Maverick827 wrote: »In real life, actual dual wielding was extremely rare if it was used seriously at all.nerevarine1138 wrote: »Unless you're fencing (you know, where there are rules to combat), there is generally no advantage to having just one weapon in one hand when you could have a shield or weapon in your off-hand.
Sword and shield, to me is working the way its supposed to now.
Use sword for major damage, use shield, mainly to disrupt or interupt mob and some minor damage. That's how its supposed work
Rastafariel wrote: »Sword and shield, to me is working the way its supposed to now.
Use sword for major damage, use shield, mainly to disrupt or interupt mob and some minor damage. That's how its supposed work
Crow you totally missed my point. For RP reasons I want to ONLY use a sword. We now cannot do that.
Sword and shield, to me is working the way its supposed to now.
Use sword for major damage, use shield, mainly to disrupt or interupt mob and some minor damage. That's how its supposed work
Rastafariel wrote: »Sword and shield, to me is working the way its supposed to now.
Use sword for major damage, use shield, mainly to disrupt or interupt mob and some minor damage. That's how its supposed work
Crow you totally missed my point. For RP reasons I want to ONLY use a sword. We now cannot do that.
Rastafariel wrote: »Sword and shield, to me is working the way its supposed to now.
Use sword for major damage, use shield, mainly to disrupt or interupt mob and some minor damage. That's how its supposed work
Crow you totally missed my point. For RP reasons I want to ONLY use a sword. We now cannot do that.
Yes we can. Just don't equip the shield. You won't have many weapon moves that way (in fact not sure if S&B will even work with just the one handed weapon equipped) but you can still combine with class and guild spells for effectiveness. You won't be top of the line, but it will be quite doable.