it is a week long test
Not sure what the subscription has to do with a base-game feature, but whatever. And since the OP threw this out for the whole community, how about a rousing "I don't care"? I don't play in Grey Host at all, so whether it's available or not doesn't matter one whit for me. I play in Blackreach in preference to Vengeance when I go into Cyrodiil, but I'm not losing a second of sleep over not being able to enter that campaign for a week.
Divine1976 wrote: »I only play ESO for Grey Host and pay ESO+ to support that. I would like to play the game I pay for
With many people enjoying their summer breaks, we would like to actually play the game that we pay a subscription for every month, the way that we want to play it. I don't want to be a test rabbit for ZOS' unwanted campaign.
Too long
"It's just a week of not playing the game you pay for, and they're gonna do it 30 times more the next few months, but it's just a week tho!"
You can move along if you're not into pvp, evidently this is a thread for people that are
Stockholm syndrome for a company is crazy
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »ZOS told us they were not going to shut down GH. Yet here we are.
I'm really not trying to provoke anyone here, but I am a data nerd from top to bottom with significantly more than a passing knowledge of polls and polling methodologies and the quantitative methods graduate work to prove it. With that out of the way,With many people enjoying their summer breaks, we would like to actually play the game that we pay a subscription for every month, the way that we want to play it. I don't want to be a test rabbit for ZOS' unwanted campaign.Too long"It's just a week of not playing the game you pay for, and they're gonna do it 30 times more the next few months, but it's just a week tho!"You can move along if you're not into pvp, evidently this is a thread for people that areStockholm syndrome for a company is crazy
Is not polling. It is not data-gathering. It is not even discussion. It is a narrative where anyone who expresses an opinion contrary to what the pollster wants to hear is wrong. A discussion where a point of view is expressed and defended against counter arguments is a discussion or debate and either term works as far as I'm concerned. But "what do you think?" followed by what is essentially "you're wrong." is not a poll.
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »ZOS told us they were not going to shut down GH. Yet here we are.
Because they need the numbers in Vengeance to test. Given the boycott by the PvP community they haven't had the numbers needed, so it forced ZOS' hand.
You all keep talking as if Vengeance as is is the finished product. It's a test environment trying to get as close to the GH ruleset as possible without tanking performance.
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »ZOS told us they were not going to shut down GH. Yet here we are.
Because they need the numbers in Vengeance to test. Given the boycott by the PvP community they haven't had the numbers needed, so it forced ZOS' hand.
You all keep talking as if Vengeance as is is the finished product. It's a test environment trying to get as close to the GH ruleset as possible without tanking performance.
Is not polling. It is not data-gathering. It is not even discussion. It is a narrative where anyone who expresses an opinion contrary to what the pollster wants to hear is wrong. A discussion where a point of view is expressed and defended against counter arguments is a discussion or debate and either term works as far as I'm concerned. But "what do you think?" followed by what is essentially "you're wrong." is not a poll.
Not sure what the subscription has to do with a base-game feature, but whatever. And since the OP threw this out for the whole community, how about a rousing "I don't care"? I don't play in Grey Host at all, so whether it's available or not doesn't matter one whit for me. I play in Blackreach in preference to Vengeance when I go into Cyrodiil, but I'm not losing a second of sleep over not being able to enter that campaign for a week.
Erickson9610 wrote: »Let ZOS get the data they need or we might get another test like this one testing the same things.
I'm really not trying to provoke anyone here, but I am a data nerd from top to bottom with significantly more than a passing knowledge of polls and polling methodologies and the quantitative methods graduate work to prove it. With that out of the way,With many people enjoying their summer breaks, we would like to actually play the game that we pay a subscription for every month, the way that we want to play it. I don't want to be a test rabbit for ZOS' unwanted campaign.Too long"It's just a week of not playing the game you pay for, and they're gonna do it 30 times more the next few months, but it's just a week tho!"You can move along if you're not into pvp, evidently this is a thread for people that areStockholm syndrome for a company is crazy
Is not polling. It is not data-gathering. It is not even discussion. It is a narrative where anyone who expresses an opinion contrary to what the pollster wants to hear is wrong. A discussion where a point of view is expressed and defended against counter arguments is a discussion or debate and either term works as far as I'm concerned. But "what do you think?" followed by what is essentially "you're wrong." is not a poll.
AdonisJorge wrote: »Besides some really useful feedback, part of the self entitled "most dedicated pvp players" are some of the worst gaming community i ever seen, it is just crying on every opportunity. Hard to believe that it is an adult person
GulmarAvocado wrote: »AdonisJorge wrote: »Besides some really useful feedback, part of the self entitled "most dedicated pvp players" are some of the worst gaming community i ever seen, it is just crying on every opportunity. Hard to believe that it is an adult person
You’re right we shouldn’t complain when the product we payed for gets ripped out of our hands.
AdonisJorge wrote: »GulmarAvocado wrote: »AdonisJorge wrote: »Besides some really useful feedback, part of the self entitled "most dedicated pvp players" are some of the worst gaming community i ever seen, it is just crying on every opportunity. Hard to believe that it is an adult person
You’re right we shouldn’t complain when the product we payed for gets ripped out of our hands.
so i found one of the self entitled here, no surprise
GulmarAvocado wrote: »AdonisJorge wrote: »Besides some really useful feedback, part of the self entitled "most dedicated pvp players" are some of the worst gaming community i ever seen, it is just crying on every opportunity. Hard to believe that it is an adult person
You’re right we shouldn’t complain when the product we payed for gets ripped out of our hands.
I love it when pvers and housing players come around and tell you what you should and shouldnt accept when you're getting spat on every patch with either neglect or straight up making it worse for you to play the game.
GulmarAvocado wrote: »AdonisJorge wrote: »Besides some really useful feedback, part of the self entitled "most dedicated pvp players" are some of the worst gaming community i ever seen, it is just crying on every opportunity. Hard to believe that it is an adult person
You’re right we shouldn’t complain when the product we payed for gets ripped out of our hands.
I love it when pvers and housing players come around and tell you what you should and shouldnt accept when you're getting spat on every patch with either neglect or straight up making it worse for you to play the game.
I'm really not trying to provoke anyone here, but I am a data nerd from top to bottom with significantly more than a passing knowledge of polls and polling methodologies and the quantitative methods graduate work to prove it. With that out of the way,With many people enjoying their summer breaks, we would like to actually play the game that we pay a subscription for every month, the way that we want to play it. I don't want to be a test rabbit for ZOS' unwanted campaign.Too long"It's just a week of not playing the game you pay for, and they're gonna do it 30 times more the next few months, but it's just a week tho!"You can move along if you're not into pvp, evidently this is a thread for people that areStockholm syndrome for a company is crazy
Is not polling. It is not data-gathering. It is not even discussion. It is a narrative where anyone who expresses an opinion contrary to what the pollster wants to hear is wrong. A discussion where a point of view is expressed and defended against counter arguments is a discussion or debate and either term works as far as I'm concerned. But "what do you think?" followed by what is essentially "you're wrong." is not a poll.