karthrag_inak wrote: »The operative word being 'just', of course. The term 'yesman', which is insulting, infers someone who agrees -only- to agree, regardless of topic or personal opinion. Khajiit does, in fact, love the new system on the strength of its own merits and his own experiences. That being said, khajiit is also open to consider other opinions, and if these opinions should have merit, khajiit would reconsider.
karthrag_inak wrote: »The operative word being 'just', of course. The term 'yesman', which is insulting, infers someone who agrees -only- to agree, regardless of topic or personal opinion. Khajiit does, in fact, love the new system on the strength of its own merits and his own experiences. That being said, khajiit is also open to consider other opinions, and if these opinions should have merit, khajiit would reconsider.
@karthrag_inak
I am DEEPLY sorry. I badly misunderstood at least two things I read this morning and your post was one of them. I have no idea how I so badly screwed up.
francesinhalover wrote: »i like my jabs on necromancer thank you.
Am i supposed to go back to the weird skull when i can do dmg to armies of enemies with my beautifull jabs?
Elvenheart wrote: »francesinhalover wrote: »i like my jabs on necromancer thank you.
Am i supposed to go back to the weird skull when i can do dmg to armies of enemies with my beautifull jabs?
What a great idea! Other than the Elementalist I built from the ground up as a brand new character, I’ve been trying to figure out what I would like to do to my existing characters and so far I haven’t been able to really think of anything. I might just give this a try, especially since we have a blue jabs now! Which line did you swap out?
francesinhalover wrote: »i like my jabs on necromancer thank you.
Am i supposed to go back to the weird skull when i can do dmg to armies of enemies with my beautifull jabs?
@BXR_Lonestar
So you're playing the game according to the rules you want instead of its actual rules, so of course it's not resulting in improvements.
There's really not a lot a huge amount of trial and error involved to get basic improvements. I seem to recall Skinny Cheeks highlighted quite a few HA builds.
Elvenheart wrote: »francesinhalover wrote: »i like my jabs on necromancer thank you.
Am i supposed to go back to the weird skull when i can do dmg to armies of enemies with my beautifull jabs?
What a great idea! Other than the Elementalist I built from the ground up as a brand new character, I’ve been trying to figure out what I would like to do to my existing characters and so far I haven’t been able to really think of anything. I might just give this a try, especially since we have a blue jabs now! Which line did you swap out?
I don't like housing or ToT.
But, I would never ask them to be removed because some do like them.
I like subclassing but can understand others don't.
Also, if they hadn't balanced the classes in the time they had before removing subclassing won't make one bit of a difference.
I don't like housing or ToT.
But, I would never ask them to be removed because some do like them.
I like subclassing but can understand others don't.
Also, if they hadn't balanced the classes in the time they had before removing subclassing won't make one bit of a difference.
Elvenheart wrote: »francesinhalover wrote: »i like my jabs on necromancer thank you.
Am i supposed to go back to the weird skull when i can do dmg to armies of enemies with my beautifull jabs?
What a great idea! Other than the Elementalist I built from the ground up as a brand new character, I’ve been trying to figure out what I would like to do to my existing characters and so far I haven’t been able to really think of anything. I might just give this a try, especially since we have a blue jabs now! Which line did you swap out?
silky_soft wrote: »Probably one of the highest answered polls in recent times. Only 55% positive towards subclassing. That's pretty bad just like theplayer retention. You can see it in the steam player numbers.
silky_soft wrote: »Probably one of the highest answered polls in recent times. Only 55% positive towards subclassing. That's pretty bad just like theplayer retention. You can see it in the steam player numbers.
Every post asking for a rollback shows a poor understanding of how developpement works.
I can garantee you that no one, even those who vote yes, would be happy with a rollback.