TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.
Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
MashmalloMan wrote: »MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
It's been 10 years, I think it's about time we stop making excuses for them even if that may be reasonable in any other circumstance, it's unacceptable to leave the game in the state it's been for this long.
MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
I can’t see them reworking class skills for the entire game for the sake of PvP. That would have some very serious implications for PvE. I think if the Cyrodiil test is successful then those skills will be tied to PvP environments only, maybe even 1 specific campaign.
That’s already how it seems to be working, the new skills will only be available in the Vengeance campaign, but everywhere else in the game there’s the usual skills. There’s still a need for balancing outside of that Vengeance campaign.
MincMincMinc wrote: »TechMaybeHic wrote: »Im pretty sure they don't want to touch it anymore. Kind of makes me think maintenance mode and the standardized campaign will be their way forward.Yes class balance should've been several pages at this point, instead we get 4 bug fixes and a bunch of nothing.
Why would they make class balance changes before they even know what the results are of the performance test? If the test is successful we would see a complete rework/rebalance of all the skills in the game.
StaticWave wrote: »
You mean good sorcs? Bad sorcs won't even do 3k DPS in full dmg sets lol
mariuszeb17_ESO5 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »
You mean good sorcs? Bad sorcs won't even do 3k DPS in full dmg sets lol
How much dps will the same players do playing a different class? Maybe a Templar - 800?
StaticWave wrote: »...
mariuszeb17_ESO5 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »...
I don't understand why you pasted those CMXs, for it to make sense they would have to come from one player. It's obvious that a less experienced player will do less dps regardless of class. And the thing is that Sorc make high damege even naked.
In PVP burst is killer not dps. Sorc has one of the greatest potentials in the game, despite its survivability and the ability to reset the fight - it is a problem.
mariuszeb17_ESO5 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »...
I don't understand why you pasted those CMXs, for it to make sense they would have to come from one player. It's obvious that a less experienced player will do less dps regardless of class. And the thing is that Sorc make high damege even naked.
In PVP burst is killer not dps. Sorc has one of the greatest potentials in the game, despite its survivability and the ability to reset the fight - it is a problem.
MincMincMinc wrote: »mariuszeb17_ESO5 wrote: »StaticWave wrote: »...
I don't understand why you pasted those CMXs, for it to make sense they would have to come from one player. It's obvious that a less experienced player will do less dps regardless of class. And the thing is that Sorc make high damege even naked.
In PVP burst is killer not dps. Sorc has one of the greatest potentials in the game, despite its survivability and the ability to reset the fight - it is a problem.
I think alot of the issues people have with sorc and nightblade is the inherent design concept. Sorc and nb were always the solo high burst damage classes. Where templar, dk, warden, necro, arc all have vastly better grouplay potential. With standardization sadly we have seen a huge loss in class identity where all of the above group classes basically are the same thing.
Asking for the two solo burst classes to lose their identity is silly. If you take away streak from a stamsorc you just get a really *** stamden that can barely do damage and not heal or buff itself or the group.
Basically anyone can build to reset the fight..... for example just throw resto ult or spell wall on any class and spam RATs.