Actually, I read in 1.1.1 that they are "Fixing an issue where interrupt could be used more frequently than intended." Which means a DK nerf...and a nerf for my character, might have to go back to dual wield.
jkbennettb14a_ESO wrote: »Actually, I read in 1.1.1 that they are "Fixing an issue where interrupt could be used more frequently than intended." Which means a DK nerf...and a nerf for my character, might have to go back to dual wield.
If you are referring to being able to spam shield bash that was a cheesy tactic to start with. I do use sword and board as one of my weapon sets, but don't rely on shield bash for damage so meh.
How are you able to do any consistent damage without spamming shield bash? Not really a cheesy tactic because it requires a stamina build and special enchantments to work well. I still can't compete against any sorcerer in DPS no matter which weapon set I try to use. Guess I should have rolled another character because DKs are survivable, but for the life of me I can't figure out how to make them do damage.
Customer support said it was a secret too My husband asked them when he had to call them about something else.
Why do you guys have to wait until after maintenance is started to announce anything? Seems weird to me but at least you are doing something I guess.
jkbennettb14a_ESO wrote: »How are you able to do any consistent damage without spamming shield bash? Not really a cheesy tactic because it requires a stamina build and special enchantments to work well. I still can't compete against any sorcerer in DPS no matter which weapon set I try to use. Guess I should have rolled another character because DKs are survivable, but for the life of me I can't figure out how to make them do damage.
Fire mage 4TW. Sword n board is for low on mana mobs are still alive mode. At least that's how my build works. Only really happens if I get adds or on elites sometimes if my ultimate wasn't up.
How would anyone think that they can "remove" bots? No one can do it in a snap. I'm sure they are doing their best to do so. But don't hold your breath on it for...tomorrow.
woodlandwoodsb14_ESO wrote: »Only releasing patch notes after the patch is made live... Concerning.
Decimus_Rex wrote: »ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »It is a secret. For now.
We'll be publishing the patch notes for v1.1.2 tomorrow sometime during the NA maintenance.
I'm hoping it is to address the run away bot/hack problem.
Nuking,public lynching and slow roasting them to perfection would be a start.
ALSO
Fixing my beloved class.. NightBlade..
I ask much I know
THAT
Would be to much for my aged heart to handle if I were granted both simultaneously
BUT
I will take a mass bot slaying for now
Ndhekjtkyiud and all his relatives must be CRUSHED with NO impunity
Blackwidow wrote: »Patch notes:
Well, we buffed DK a little more. We felt they were not quite god like enough.
Then we kicked NB right in the balls.
Thank you.
steven.flemingub17_ESO wrote: »Snip
Blackwidow wrote: »steven.flemingub17_ESO wrote: »Snip
Honesty, thank you, but I was just making a joke. I don't even play a DK or NB.
It was more an overall theme of the forums.
I think that was meant as a joke. It's been the practice for a while now to post patch notes when the server goes down for maintenance.Out of curiosity, why are the patch notes a secret?
Yes we really need a zillion gallons of tears before each patch because yet again not any possible issue was fixed in the upcoming patch.woodlandwoodsb14_ESO wrote: »Only releasing patch notes after the patch is made live... Concerning.
Out of curiosity, why are the patch notes a secret?
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »It is a secret. For now.
We'll be publishing the patch notes for v1.1.2 tomorrow sometime during the NA maintenance.
samcharles77_ESO wrote: »Customer support said it was a secret too My husband asked them when he had to call them about something else.
Why do you guys have to wait until after maintenance is started to announce anything? Seems weird to me but at least you are doing something I guess.
My guess would be just in case they decide not to implement something they had planned to with this patch. Easier to post when they are fairly certain rather than having to explain why they didn't implement something.
Blackwidow wrote: »