6man Zerg Farming

Lowbei

I see so many threads about cyrodiil being zergy. You know... if you people stopped zerging, you might have a lot more fun, and might actually get better at the game.

We are waiting on some decent guild groups to form up so we can hopefully have some gvg here later, this usually happens when quality players ditch their zergs and make good smallman groups. So, protip, if you want to compete, ditch all the bads and form a real guild.

In the meantime, heres some zerg bombing videos to inspire you to drop your zerg. Also, 24 isnt a guild group, its a zerg, just throwing that out there.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BKcMWX2Zfvs

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qw1mCB6rD0E

http://youtube.com/watch?v=do8PfJq5bsE

riohs twitch has a lot more, but we are too lazy to edit

WTB gvg arena plz

Zintair

Which campaign is this? The EP are really terrible.

Lowbei

We play on AB and Wabba, or wherever the action is.

and they are zerging, so yes, they are terrible.

Talcyndl

Lol at group of 24 = zerg.

Zintair

Lowbei wrote: »

We play on AB and Wabba, or wherever the action is.

and they are zerging, so yes, they are terrible.

+1 for understanding the difference between the lame zerg and organized PvP. You guys did well against an uncoordinated raid group.

But what you fought is HARDLY a zerg. That's a raid group. You can't just make up definitions to suit your point.

24 != zerg

and LOL at a Sorc using that Ultimate.

Any sorc not using Suppression Field is doing it HORRIBLY WRONG.

It's the best Ultimate in the game right now.

Lowbei

lol those 2 sorc overload ultimates plus the dks standard are what killed them, as we didnt need any negate magic fields, clearly.

it was a zerg, period, you cannot make up terms like "raid group" to feel better about zerging lol. call them whatever you want, i call them free rps.

legiont666ub17_ESO

Zintair wrote: »

Lowbei wrote: »

We play on AB and Wabba, or wherever the action is.

and they are zerging, so yes, they are terrible.

+1 for understanding the difference between the lame zerg and organized PvP. You guys did well against an uncoordinated raid group.

But what you fought is HARDLY a zerg. That's a raid group. You can't just make up definitions to suit your point.

24 != zerg

and LOL at a Sorc using that Ultimate.

Any sorc not using Suppression Field is doing it HORRIBLY WRONG.

It's the best Ultimate in the game right now.

Oh i'm sorry you must watch the video where we went up against 200+ and owned them.

lao

id say well played if this game had literally any room for actual skillful play. the way it is i can only say gratz for not beeing braindead zombies.

lao

dbetterton_ESO wrote: »

Lol at group of 24 = zerg.

24 is a zerg u muppet. even 15 is.

Thechemicals

When attention seeking become attention craving, you get pvp boasting in more than one thread.

LilMcGinley

Spread out, unorganized pugs.. I don't see the zerg or bomb anywhere here.

Lowbei

lol i love all the hate coming in from free rps zergers

if you could read english, you would know that the point is to help the bads to stop zerging and make us some competition. the thread isnt about us, its about making you better. you are welcome.

Thechemicals

You sound like someone unlikable

Lowbei

unlikable? Im a Nice Guy, didnt you read the guild name? lol

been zerg bombing for about a decade, jussayin

less butthurt plz if you dont mind

Talcyndl

lao wrote: »

dbetterton_ESO wrote: »

Lol at group of 24 = zerg.

24 is a zerg u muppet. even 15 is.

You hurt my feelings.

So if 15 is a "zerg" what do you call 50 or a 100 DC rolling over the hill?

This isn't 8 man arena PvP. 20-30 man groups are the perfect size for keep taking (and other organized offensive action) on an active, populated server.

As much as I enjoy small team action, that doesn't negate the usefulness (and propriety) of raid groups. And unless you are playing on a deserted campaign, such groups are hardly "zergy".

Thechemicals

Who else thinks this guy sniffs his own farts?

Lowbei

again, you can call it whatever you want to feel better about zerging. Sounds like free rps to me.

chemicals, im sorry that your zerg got rolled by a smallman, but lets dial back on the butthurt, thanks

Thechemicals

You respond so fast to your own thread,are you hyperfocused on our feedback about you now?

Talcyndl

I doubt your 6 man group is going to farm AP off most (and certainly not our) 24 man organized, TS-using raid groups.

Which is the difference between organized raid groups and zergs. Zergs will scatter and run around like headless chickens when you hit them. We will hop off siege, turn as a group and kill you. Especially if you aren't running Negate Magic/Suppression Field.

legiont666ub17_ESO

you responded really fast to are you interested in him i can introduce you.

Lowbei

im at work, on my lunch break, and not a lot else to do.

exactly how many times did you get rolled to become this butthurt over someones video?

Thechemicals

legiont666ub17_ESO wrote: »

you responded really fast to are you interested in him i can introduce you.

Sounds like he already has a boyfriend, are you here to protect him? You can start by teaching him manners.

Lowbei

lol so much butthurt that im betting he saw himself get rolled in the video, else why would he be so mad about it?

can i find you an Etissue or something?

legiont666ub17_ESO

dbetterton_ESO wrote: »

I doubt your 6 man group is going to farm AP off most (and certainly not our) 24 man organized, TS-using raid groups.

Which is the difference between organized raid groups and zergs. Zergs will scatter and run around like headless chickens when you hit them. We will hop off siege, turn as a group and kill you. Especially if you aren't running Negate Magic/Suppression Field.

When would you like to have this battle I would like to test this theory of yours.

Dietaryfiber

I mean hey, at least it's not outnumbered at a bridge/tower.

lao

dbetterton_ESO wrote: »

So if 15 is a "zerg" what do you call 50 or a 100 DC rolling over the hill?

a zerg.

This isn't 8 man arena PvP. 20-30 man groups are the perfect size for keep taking (and other organized offensive action) on an active, populated server.

thats what zergs do cos they suck at anything remotely competitive.

As much as I enjoy small team action, that doesn't negate the usefulness (and propriety) of raid groups. And unless you are playing on a deserted campaign, such groups are hardly "zergy".

it is a zerg. skilled players dont take keeps and therefor there is no need to run raid groups no matter how populated a campaign is.

lao

dbetterton_ESO wrote: »

I doubt your 6 man group is going to farm AP off most (and certainly not our) 24 man organized, TS-using raid groups.

Which is the difference between organized raid groups and zergs. Zergs will scatter and run around like headless chickens when you hit them. We will hop off siege, turn as a group and kill you. Especially if you aren't running Negate Magic/Suppression Field.

u can zerg a 6man group with 24 morons. want a cookie?

Lowbei

awww i think its adorable when free rp zergers tell themselves that their zerg could win

bring more than 24, you will need more bro, no offense.

fyi, you missed the point of the thread lol

Thechemicals

Lol i havent done pvp in 2 weeks. Just like messing with the pvp napoleon's.

dsalter

Lowbei wrote: »

*snip*
http://youtube.com/watch?v=BKcMWX2Zfvs

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qw1mCB6rD0E

http://youtube.com/watch?v=do8PfJq5bsE

why did the guy streaming that look like the two and a half men, allen? :P

Lowbei

Thechemicals wrote: »

Lol i havent done pvp in 2 weeks. Just like messing with the pvp napoleon's.

oh, so you WERE just a butthurt zerger. called it! lol