What I think is awesome is that while the thread brings light to the quests, ZoS nor many at large felt the need to. We are FINALLY getting to the point where it's like - oh it's a same sex relationship - <shrug> on to the next quest. I think that's fantastic. So I agree with the OP, but partly because ZoS didn't make a big deal about doing it and even more that the community seems (for the most part) accepting of it as well.
I don't mind the lesbian and gay NPC's in this game, or the ability for gay marriage between players. I don't mind them at all as long as its balanced with heterosexual relationships. Too often in an attempt to be "progressive" developers kind of get to a point of being preachy about it. GW2 has more high profile Lesbian relationships than any other type, and its kind of goitten preachy.
The relationships just need to be treated as a matter of fact in the game world like heterosexual relationships. Like, a female NPC asking you to help her find a cure for her wife's illness... just leave it at that. What we don't need is a question we have to ask to take the quest where our characters get incredulous and force the NPC to explain why she has a same sex wife, and hear her story about how she was persecuted in their old village, etc. That to me is immersion breaking because it seems more like trying to push real world politics into the game. I don't need real world pol;itical agenda, to me.. those relationships have been treated just like any other in Tamriel and have been socially acceptable for a long time, my character shouldn't be questioning it, my character should just be saying okay so where can I start looking to help your wife?
I don't mind the lesbian and gay NPC's in this game, or the ability for gay marriage between players. I don't mind them at all as long as its balanced with heterosexual relationships. Too often in an attempt to be "progressive" developers kind of get to a point of being preachy about it. GW2 has more high profile Lesbian relationships than any other type, and its kind of goitten preachy.
The relationships just need to be treated as a matter of fact in the game world like heterosexual relationships. Like, a female NPC asking you to help her find a cure for her wife's illness... just leave it at that. What we don't need is a question we have to ask to take the quest where our characters get incredulous and force the NPC to explain why she has a same sex wife, and hear her story about how she was persecuted in their old village, etc. That to me is immersion breaking because it seems more like trying to push real world politics into the game. I don't need real world pol;itical agenda, to me.. those relationships have been treated just like any other in Tamriel and have been socially acceptable for a long time, my character shouldn't be questioning it, my character should just be saying okay so where can I start looking to help your wife?
Fair enough. If they are in the game,
it's better that they aren't "preaching" so that I can just try and ignore them.
What I think is awesome is that while the thread brings light to the quests, ZoS nor many at large felt the need to. We are FINALLY getting to the point where it's like - oh it's a same sex relationship - <shrug> on to the next quest. I think that's fantastic. So I agree with the OP, but partly because ZoS didn't make a big deal about doing it and even more that the community seems (for the most part) accepting of it as well.
I don't. Not because I fear gays, but I don't think they fit into a medieval setting.
Players should be allowed gay-marriage of course, but seeing npcs in gay-marriage
is immersion-breaking and takes me from the gaming experience. I don't want Tamriel to be part of the real-life quarrel (right word?)of gays being accepted or not.
Tamriel is not Medieval Europe.
What I think is awesome is that while the thread brings light to the quests, ZoS nor many at large felt the need to. We are FINALLY getting to the point where it's like - oh it's a same sex relationship - <shrug> on to the next quest. I think that's fantastic. So I agree with the OP, but partly because ZoS didn't make a big deal about doing it and even more that the community seems (for the most part) accepting of it as well.
I don't. Not because I fear gays, but I don't think they fit into a medieval setting.
Players should be allowed gay-marriage of course, but seeing npcs in gay-marriage
is immersion-breaking and takes me from the gaming experience. I don't want Tamriel to be part of the real-life quarrel (right word?)of gays being accepted or not.
Tamriel is not Medieval Europe.
Not because I fear gays, but I don't think they fit into a medieval setting. [...]
seeing npcs in gay-marriage is immersion-breaking and takes me from the gaming experience.
Not because I fear gays, but I don't think they fit into a medieval setting. [...]
seeing npcs in gay-marriage is immersion-breaking and takes me from the gaming experience.
Hmm. So out-and-unpersecuted gay NPCs break your sense of immersion in a medieval setting -- but not the talking cat-people, aedra and daedra, teleport stations, magic potions and insta-horses? I accept your word for it that you don't consciously fear gays, but you might consider reflecting on why that one thing disturbs you, but none of the others do.
Well.
I missed all the excitement, but I gather than this thread became a little heated over the past few days.
Well.
I missed all the excitement, but I gather than this thread became a little heated over the past few days.
It really wasn't anything major at all. One person felt they were being excluded because they aren't LGBT, so they got a little cranky. Personally, I don't think it was worth deleting comments over, but it's not my place to decide how that works.
Well.
I missed all the excitement, but I gather than this thread became a little heated over the past few days.
It really wasn't anything major at all. One person felt they were being excluded because they aren't LGBT, so they got a little cranky. Personally, I don't think it was worth deleting comments over, but it's not my place to decide how that works.
One person got "cranky" because an alternate thread that mentioned Heterosexual Quests got taken down while this one survives. Double standard at its finest.
You are right about it not being worth deleting the comments over, though.
Well.
I missed all the excitement, but I gather than this thread became a little heated over the past few days.
It really wasn't anything major at all. One person felt they were being excluded because they aren't LGBT, so they got a little cranky. Personally, I don't think it was worth deleting comments over, but it's not my place to decide how that works.
One person got "cranky" because an alternate thread that mentioned Heterosexual Quests got taken down while this one survives. Double standard at its finest.
You are right about it not being worth deleting the comments over, though.
Well.
I missed all the excitement, but I gather than this thread became a little heated over the past few days.
It really wasn't anything major at all. One person felt they were being excluded because they aren't LGBT, so they got a little cranky. Personally, I don't think it was worth deleting comments over, but it's not my place to decide how that works.
One person got "cranky" because an alternate thread that mentioned Heterosexual Quests got taken down while this one survives. Double standard at its finest.
You are right about it not being worth deleting the comments over, though.
I meant no ill will toward you by saying you were "cranky." It was simply the nicest way for me to explain it. I also don't think you were trolling (there was obvious sarcasm involved, but I don't think that makes you a troll). I think you genuinely feel left out, hence why you made that thread. You seemed annoyed when you made it, and I understand that the closure of it made you more upset.
Just remember that not everyone is out to separate themselves or to push you away. There might be some people like that (I know there are, as I've dealt with many in LGBT communities), but there are also those who try to be inclusive. Try to focus on the good ones, if you can.
Hey, I tried, but that thread was 95% personal jabs and so doomed to die.
Hey, I tried, but that thread was 95% personal jabs and so doomed to die.
Back to TES, you're not entirely correct, Ahnjil. There's been more than one gay NPC in the previous games, there were couples; look up my post on the previous page. We don't know if they were married, the games didn't say, we don't know how they were perceived by other people. But there is no evidence that they weren't accepted, so we cannot assume this to be true just because we think it should be in a medievalesque fantasy setting. Tamriel has magic leaking through the sun and spaceships and time travel; why should its society be exactly like ours?
What we do know is that nobody has a problem with the player character's same-sex marriage in Skyrim; that at least some Khajiit are open-minded about it (Ahzirr Traajijazeri, "Life is short. If you have not made love recently, please, put down this book, and take care of that with all haste. Find a wanton lass or a frisky lad, or several, in whatever combination your wise loins direct, and do not under any circumstances play hard to get. Our struggle against the colossal forces of oppression can wait.") And now that it's completely normal in ESO.
So there really is no basis for saying that it's lore-breaking. This is not a political statement, it's been there for years.
Hey, I tried, but that thread was 95% personal jabs and so doomed to die.
Back to TES, you're not entirely correct, Ahnjil. There's been more than one gay NPC in the previous games, there were couples; look up my post on the previous page. We don't know if they were married, the games didn't say, we don't know how they were perceived by other people. But there is no evidence that they weren't accepted, so we cannot assume this to be true just because we think it should be in a medievalesque fantasy setting. Tamriel has magic leaking through the sun and spaceships and time travel; why should its society be exactly like ours?
What we do know is that nobody has a problem with the player character's same-sex marriage in Skyrim; that at least some Khajiit are open-minded about it (Ahzirr Traajijazeri, "Life is short. If you have not made love recently, please, put down this book, and take care of that with all haste. Find a wanton lass or a frisky lad, or several, in whatever combination your wise loins direct, and do not under any circumstances play hard to get. Our struggle against the colossal forces of oppression can wait.") And now that it's completely normal in ESO.
So there really is no basis for saying that it's lore-breaking. This is not a political statement, it's been there for years.
This amount of gay marriages a thousand years before the other games is a little lore breaking. About Tamriel being a fantasy world: This is not about what there is, but what is accepted. If there had been magic in real life and in common use, it would have been accepted. But it's a primitive world, like ours was and the people are like our people were and are, with same sins and same virtues.
In real world, gays were rarely accepted. But in ESO, they are accepted everywhere. That amount of gay acceptance is just not realistic in a world full of intolerance like Tamriel is. As for player marriages - let players do what they want. Forbidding them would also be seen as taking part in the gay quarrel.
One person felt they were being excluded because they aren't LGBT
What I think is awesome is that while the thread brings light to the quests, ZoS nor many at large felt the need to. We are FINALLY getting to the point where it's like - oh it's a same sex relationship - <shrug> on to the next quest. I think that's fantastic. So I agree with the OP, but partly because ZoS didn't make a big deal about doing it and even more that the community seems (for the most part) accepting of it as well.
I don't. Not because I fear gays, but I don't think they fit into a medieval setting.
Players should be allowed gay-marriage of course, but seeing npcs in gay-marriage
is immersion-breaking and takes me from the gaming experience. I don't want Tamriel to be part of the real-life quarrel (right word?)of gays being accepted or not.
Tamriel is not Medieval Europe.
It is very much like it.
Hey, I tried, but that thread was 95% personal jabs and so doomed to die.
Back to TES, you're not entirely correct, Ahnjil. There's been more than one gay NPC in the previous games, there were couples; look up my post on the previous page. We don't know if they were married, the games didn't say, we don't know how they were perceived by other people. But there is no evidence that they weren't accepted, so we cannot assume this to be true just because we think it should be in a medievalesque fantasy setting. Tamriel has magic leaking through the sun and spaceships and time travel; why should its society be exactly like ours?
What we do know is that nobody has a problem with the player character's same-sex marriage in Skyrim; that at least some Khajiit are open-minded about it (Ahzirr Traajijazeri, "Life is short. If you have not made love recently, please, put down this book, and take care of that with all haste. Find a wanton lass or a frisky lad, or several, in whatever combination your wise loins direct, and do not under any circumstances play hard to get. Our struggle against the colossal forces of oppression can wait.") And now that it's completely normal in ESO.
So there really is no basis for saying that it's lore-breaking. This is not a political statement, it's been there for years.
This amount of gay marriages a thousand years before the other games is a little lore breaking. About Tamriel being a fantasy world: This is not about what there is, but what is accepted. If there had been magic in real life and in common use, it would have been accepted. But it's a primitive world, like ours was and the people are like our people were and are, with same sins and same virtues.
In real world, gays were rarely accepted. But in ESO, they are accepted everywhere. That amount of gay acceptance is just not realistic in a world full of intolerance like Tamriel is. As for player marriages - let players do what they want. Forbidding them would also be seen as taking part in the gay quarrel.
Actually, I was leaning more on the side that it wasn't lore-breaking until you said that. It's strange but I never even thought about why the "issue" of gay/lesbian marriage is shown more tolerance than other "issues" such as race. Guess I have more to think about.
What I think is awesome is that while the thread brings light to the quests, ZoS nor many at large felt the need to. We are FINALLY getting to the point where it's like - oh it's a same sex relationship - <shrug> on to the next quest. I think that's fantastic. So I agree with the OP, but partly because ZoS didn't make a big deal about doing it and even more that the community seems (for the most part) accepting of it as well.
I don't. Not because I fear gays, but I don't think they fit into a medieval setting.
Players should be allowed gay-marriage of course, but seeing npcs in gay-marriage
is immersion-breaking and takes me from the gaming experience. I don't want Tamriel to be part of the real-life quarrel (right word?)of gays being accepted or not.
Tamriel is not Medieval Europe.
It is very much like it.
; A large amount of the bigotry towards homosexuality has a religious basis. While numerous religions in Tamriel mention racial superiority, none mention sexuality. Hence I have no trouble believing in a society that hates other races, yet has no bias against sexual orientation. Some of the most aggressive and war-like Native American tribes, xenophobic and hostile, still had no bias against the homosexuals, who took in children who had lost parents. The Spartans are another good example of xenophobia without homophobia. So I don't find intolerance that doesn't match our society's to be particularly implausible.