Back on the 18th we were told that @Zos_Kevin would have an update on teabagging policy for us, that sure would be good to have before MYM starts on Thursday.
spartaxoxo wrote: »Where did he say there'd be an update? I'm not seeing the thread?
DenverRalphy wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »Where did he say there'd be an update? I'm not seeing the thread?
Last comment of the thread...
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/662651/teabagging
Araneae6537 wrote: »I don’t know why it should be needed.
1) Just don’t. At best it’s juvenile and unsportsmanlike.
2) Ignore what others do that doesn’t affect your gameplay. Don’t reward them idiots by paying them any attention. Of course truly egregious behavior should be reported, but otherwise, just ignore.
I'd love to see what would happen if someone did it in a football world cup game. Or American football.
'Ohhh but you can ask them to stop, and just don't let it worry you'
🤣🤣🤣
Araneae6537 wrote: »I don’t know why it should be needed.
1) Just don’t. At best it’s juvenile and unsportsmanlike.
2) Ignore what others do that doesn’t affect your gameplay. Don’t reward the idiots by paying them any attention. Of course truly egregious behavior should be reported, but otherwise, just ignore.
Photosniper89 wrote: »Araneae6537 wrote: »I don’t know why it should be needed.
1) Just don’t. At best it’s juvenile and unsportsmanlike.
2) Ignore what others do that doesn’t affect your gameplay. Don’t reward the idiots by paying them any attention. Of course truly egregious behavior should be reported, but otherwise, just ignore.
orrrrrrrrrr we can allow tea bagging since that has been the history of every game ever.
Photosniper89 wrote: »Araneae6537 wrote: »I don’t know why it should be needed.
1) Just don’t. At best it’s juvenile and unsportsmanlike.
2) Ignore what others do that doesn’t affect your gameplay. Don’t reward the idiots by paying them any attention. Of course truly egregious behavior should be reported, but otherwise, just ignore.
orrrrrrrrrr we can allow tea bagging since that has been the history of every game ever.
But this is ESO and Zenimax has taken a different approach. Granted, they treat t-bagging after being asked not to as a low-level issue so it would only hamper those who tend to be a problem child. At least from what I have read coming from the big Z.
Xoelarasizerer wrote: »There's a bajillion mementos/emotes you can use if you are the taunting type already.
Tiny Violin is so my beloved I use it on WBs anyone can dunk on with their eyes closed. If someone thrashes and then teabags me in PvP, I'll more likely assume they have no interesting emotes to stylise with. It isn't 2008 anymore.
Photosniper89 wrote: »Araneae6537 wrote: »I don’t know why it should be needed.
1) Just don’t. At best it’s juvenile and unsportsmanlike.
2) Ignore what others do that doesn’t affect your gameplay. Don’t reward the idiots by paying them any attention. Of course truly egregious behavior should be reported, but otherwise, just ignore.
orrrrrrrrrr we can allow tea bagging since that has been the history of every game ever.
I'd love to see what would happen if someone did it in a football world cup game. Or American football.
'Ohhh but you can ask them to stop, and just don't let it worry you'
🤣🤣🤣
xylena_lazarow wrote: »Players just want to know whether bagging officially violates TOS or not. Shouldn't be this hard to answer.
ZOS_GinaBruno wrote: »As with many things in-game, context is very important. The act of standing and squatting over another NPC or character to teabag them can be considered a form of harassment which can be a violation of the Terms of Service (ToS). As with all forms of harassment, if a player asks you to stop a behavior, you need to stop. If you continue to teabag someone that asks you to stop, that is a violation of the ToS and may lead to your account being suspended or even permanently banned. Hope this helps clear things up
I have talked to Gina and here's their official statement on the new CoC and PvP
That's the whole problem, "it depends" isn't a rule, it's arbitrary and there's no court of law to argue. A lot of the guys bagging are hiding in offline mode so it's not like you can even tell them to stop, making Gina's posts seem toothless. Other players don't want to be arbitrarily banned for bagging their friend as a harmless in-joke. Either it's allowed, or it isn't.spartaxoxo wrote: »The official rule is that depends on the circumstances
xylena_lazarow wrote: »That's the whole problem, "it depends" isn't a rule, it's arbitrary and there's no court of law to argue. A lot of the guys bagging are hiding in offline mode so it's not like you can even tell them to stop, making Gina's posts seem toothless. Other players don't want to be arbitrarily banned for bagging their friend as a harmless in-joke. Either it's allowed, or it isn't.spartaxoxo wrote: »The official rule is that depends on the circumstances
xylena_lazarow wrote: »That's the whole problem, "it depends" isn't a rule, it's arbitrary and there's no court of law to argue. A lot of the guys bagging are hiding in offline mode so it's not like you can even tell them to stop, making Gina's posts seem toothless. Other players don't want to be arbitrarily banned for bagging their friend as a harmless in-joke. Either it's allowed, or it isn't.spartaxoxo wrote: »The official rule is that depends on the circumstances
Start by asking the other player to STOP the behavior that you find offensive or harassing, even if the other player has you blocked.
spartaxoxo wrote: »[...]xylena_lazarow wrote: »That's the whole problem, "it depends" isn't a rule, it's arbitrary and there's no court of law to argue. A lot of the guys bagging are hiding in offline mode so it's not like you can even tell them to stop, making Gina's posts seem toothless. Other players don't want to be arbitrarily banned for bagging their friend as a harmless in-joke. Either it's allowed, or it isn't.spartaxoxo wrote: »The official rule is that depends on the circumstances
I don't see why friends having innocent fun should be banned because there's some authoritarian rule that says that it's never okay.
And I don't see why someone should be allowed to follow and harass another user so much that they quit the game mode, or perhaps the game itself, either.
An overly broad, authoritarian ruling would make either of those unfair outcomes the norm. The current ruling allows them to look at existing harassment criteria (asking someone to stop is just one aspect and not always necessary), and apply those standards to the action, to determine if it meets those criteria. And if it does meet the criteria for harassment, act accordingly.