Rohamad_Ali wrote: »Permanent Bans should be reserved only for Cheat Engine , The worse types of harassment , Gold Sellers and Bots . You don't perma ban players over broken sets because some players don't read the forums or even know some sets are broken . If somethings really broken , ZOS should remove it before banning players . Don't re release it until it's fixed .
pogopwns_ESO wrote: »They threatened perma-ban over the use of a broken set before last patch, did we all forget that?
pogopwns_ESO wrote: »really though, just because devs release broken items, there should be no punishment for those who repeatedly and shamelessly exploit them every single patch? idk man
pogopwns_ESO wrote: »really though, just because devs release broken items, there should be no punishment for those who repeatedly and shamelessly exploit them every single patch? idk man
Hahaha you joking right?pogopwns_ESO wrote: »really though, just because devs release broken items, there should be no punishment for those who repeatedly and shamelessly exploit them every single patch? idk man
No, get real seriously.
Permaban players for using a set thats strong?
It's not broken they just didnt realize how much impact it would be or should they ban everyone thats using proc sets aswell?
DannyLV702 wrote: »No offense. But are you stupid?
pogopwns_ESO wrote: »Hahaha you joking right?pogopwns_ESO wrote: »really though, just because devs release broken items, there should be no punishment for those who repeatedly and shamelessly exploit them every single patch? idk man
No, get real seriously.
Permaban players for using a set thats strong?
It's not broken they just didnt realize how much impact it would be or should they ban everyone thats using proc sets aswell?
It's not the set being strong that's a problem, it's that it's being used and exploited to break intended game mechanics. It ignores stealth and LoS mechanics unintentionally. If it were a question of it being too strong, infernal would be one of the last sets in question tbh.
DannyLV702 wrote: »No offense. But are you stupid?