bruceb14_ESO5 wrote: »This discussion has got off track. I'm curious what do we do with videos that show behaviors such as a large group of a faction sitting on the wall of a keep doing nothing while keep is being attacked? What do we do with videos that show chats that seem abusive towards those healing or hitting or repairing?
Is their a system in place to add evidence to reports instead of what we just say?
It is obvious that there is a problem and many of us do not like it. Really doesn't matter what guilds or sides, but that there are abuses happening.
I do wonder sometimes who ZOS developers go to for suggestions for a strong representative picture.
I would disagree and say there is no honor in video games -- none. Zero. The moment you think there is, is the precise moment you find all your gear missing and your guild bank empty.
I have some chat screen shots from yesterday. But I Believe name and shame is not allowed here. But if just a few guest the campaign (like we did yesterday), its very easy to stop them.
bruceb14_ESO5 wrote: »I have some chat screen shots from yesterday. But I Believe name and shame is not allowed here. But if just a few guest the campaign (like we did yesterday), its very easy to stop them.
I do not want to name and shame, but do want to show evidence of what is occurring. I'm not sure how to go about that. We tend to act differently when we feel anonymous or not accountable for our actions. Perhaps some random sightings of GMs in game on Celarus posing as Quartermaster.
bruceb14_ESO5 wrote: »I have some chat screen shots from yesterday. But I Believe name and shame is not allowed here. But if just a few guest the campaign (like we did yesterday), its very easy to stop them.
I do not want to name and shame, but do want to show evidence of what is occurring. I'm not sure how to go about that. We tend to act differently when we feel anonymous or not accountable for our actions. Perhaps some random sightings of GMs in game on Celarus posing as Quartermaster.
bruceb14_ESO5 wrote: »I haven't been in Celarus in the past couple of days. Is the problem still happening the same? Did it yesterday? Is there evidence of some of the abuses, zone chats, whispers, screenshots, videos with TS sound? I guess those could be posted on the forum as youtube links. Is that true?
As a community we do have some ability to stop this. In the long run it messes up the game balance and developers have to tweak numbers to counteract the abuse that could hurt everyone.
To ZOS_LenaicR, I do see the possibility of guilds possibly involved wanting to close this thread. I also see that we do, as a community, have the ability to turn things in a more positive direction with conversation and action. I appreciate your letting us know that this is being seen and to keep on track. Thank you.
Jessica Folsom wrote:It's a very grey area.
Jessica Folsom wrote:It's a very grey area.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »
I say that because there are many people who did get it legitimately
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »
I say that because there are many people who did get it legitimately
the emperors who have 3 people playing the account? the ones who power leveled to get to pvp when their guildmates were the only ones on the map?what emporer has won by simply pvping 'the right way'? they all have won by playing the system, maximize those points, or being abdicated to.
for a pure pvper pve is a means to an end: faster leveling, some gear/gear upgrade pieces, cheap grand soul gems. they will gladly game the system and aoe kill mobs to level in 20 hours, because they dont care about pve.
for a pure pve player, pvp is a means to an end get pve buffs and skyshards. there is no difference.
the pve player does not care about your pvp experience any more than the person who pvps exclusively cares about his pve experience. to argue that they should is futile at best.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »Celarus emperor has become a joke like thing in my group(s). We ran into a group and one guy was a former emperor, he did nothing but flail his weapon around and die. We laughed and said "Must be one of those celarus emperors"
Seriously though, one of the problems that needs discussion is removing the former emperor bonus. I say that because there are many people who did get it legitimately and I have no issues with them having that bonus. It's a challenge, they won, and they should be rewarded. The problem is these celarus idiots having them.
@leewells
Im tired of you dragging my name into your [snip], trying to push blame on everyone but yourself. Hell you even blamed PvE. Then the ridicule started as you tried to back peddle. (Not just at myself but to a multitude of other people.) When that failed, you resorted to damage control and earnest attempts to de-rail the thread to try and save face. Your pissed that you got caught. We all get it.
You even admitted to it. That's admirable. I commend your spirit.And for the record: My guild is on Celarus. We are "farming" emperor. (Edited to cut all the bull)
There was a omitted testimony earlier in the thread about how some of these certain guilds operate (Not mentioning any names or guilds involved) and how they do so at the cost of other players. Guildmasters/Officers of the guild(s)involved in such blatant exploit(s) of the game mechanics should be made example of.
On top of that...
One would think ZoS should remove the former emp buff. As it, and the greed of some guilds have destroyed Celarus. Not to mention the other low populated servers.
I, as an avid PvP supporter would not gripe if it was removed from the game, for the health of the game. It would seem the most logic approach to the situation.
[Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Cursing & Profanity]
ZOS_BrianWheeler wrote: »We want to make significant changes to the types and durations of Campaigns. To do this, we’d shut down the currently-existing Campaigns and introduce five new ones per megaserver. Here are the Campaign types and durations we’re thinking about adding:
• Bow of Shadows: Veteran Rank only Campaign (five-day campaign)
• Blackwater Blade: Non-Veteran only Campaign (five-day campaign)
• Haderus: seven-day standard Campaign that anyone can join.
• Chillrend: seven-day standard Campaign that anyone can join.
• Thornblade: 30-day standard Campaign that anyone can join.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »Celarus emperor has become a joke like thing in my group(s). We ran into a group and one guy was a former emperor, he did nothing but flail his weapon around and die. We laughed and said "Must be one of those celarus emperors"
Seriously though, one of the problems that needs discussion is removing the former emperor bonus. I say that because there are many people who did get it legitimately and I have no issues with them having that bonus. It's a challenge, they won, and they should be rewarded. The problem is these celarus idiots having them.
Celarus isn't the only place this happens so can't really point a at celarus. This was happening on Volendrung and other campaigns before Celarus even came out, just now with the 2 week reset Celarus has made it easier.
the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »the.dzeneralb16_ESO wrote: »Celarus emperor has become a joke like thing in my group(s). We ran into a group and one guy was a former emperor, he did nothing but flail his weapon around and die. We laughed and said "Must be one of those celarus emperors"
Seriously though, one of the problems that needs discussion is removing the former emperor bonus. I say that because there are many people who did get it legitimately and I have no issues with them having that bonus. It's a challenge, they won, and they should be rewarded. The problem is these celarus idiots having them.
Celarus isn't the only place this happens so can't really point a at celarus. This was happening on Volendrung and other campaigns before Celarus even came out, just now with the 2 week reset Celarus has made it easier.
Celarus has been pointed at because it's the first time so many people have seen it. I mean, we all want it to stop regardless of where it's going on