Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
sorc and dk aren't op, nb and templar just suck and need a buff like yesterday
Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
Wrong im doing trials also, and i can tell you templars are better healers thanks to the healing ultimate.. But that is basicly it ( and the AOE casting heal is decent )
Its his opinion, and i respect that.. But as a templar healer i disagree, i heal my whole raid basicly solo till the second boss .. so
( They are not needed, thats maybe true.. and i dont see how ZoS is missing this.. This needs fixes and ASAP, otherwise half of the game will leave )
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
rdfarley89 wrote: »Hmm I have no issues with my templar, plays just fine. Can do great damage and great heals. I am not saying an issue does not exist, but is it possible that the issues seen are based on build or gear?
Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
rdfarley89 wrote: »Hmm I have no issues with my templar, plays just fine. Can do great damage and great heals. I am not saying an issue does not exist, but is it possible that the issues seen are based on build or gear?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
Wrong im doing trials also, and i can tell you templars are better healers thanks to the healing ultimate.. But that is basicly it ( and the AOE casting heal is decent )
Its his opinion, and i respect that.. But as a templar healer i disagree, i heal my whole raid basicly solo till the second boss .. so
( They are not needed, thats maybe true.. and i dont see how ZoS is missing this.. This needs fixes and ASAP, otherwise half of the game will leave )
Ofcourse your right to your opinion. The ulti is not needed for trials and beyond that you can't move (wth?) what the streams are saying and I agree with is that there's no reason to bring templars, specially not for dps. Sorcerers do it better.
Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
rdfarley89 wrote: »Hmm I have no issues with my templar, plays just fine. Can do great damage and great heals. I am not saying an issue does not exist, but is it possible that the issues seen are based on build or gear?
I dont have any issues. I'm full gold. It's just that sorc and dk outshines us. Im talking trials and the OP across the board it seems.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
Sallington wrote: »Anything useful that players are wanting added into the game all fall under the category of "Yer ruinin my 'mersion!"
terence.caroneb17_ESO wrote: »You don't get problems with templars in PvE until VR Content (well, now you're maybe gonna get problems cause of Biting Jabs being just ***).
But in VR Content and PvP, templar as dps (and even tanking in fact, cause of Biting Jabs nerf again) is just horribly weak. Before the patch, we were weak in PvP and got our asses handed to us by every DK VR build in PvP (and Sorcs too sometimes), now it's just everywhere.
Only builds available now as VR templar now are a Healer build and Ranged dps (*** dps still, compared to sorcs and dk).
Then, they're announcing Biting Jabs will be restored as it were ... BUT with more magicka cost. Cause you know, we didn't have enough magicka costs with other skills, and we don't have any magicka management in our skills (outside a little reduction) but we're OP. One guy in the world thought Biting Jabs was OP, but this guy worked at Zenimax. Bad luck I guess.
Before, we asked for a buff of templars damage/skill trees. Now we just ask to be the weak melee templar we were a few days ago instead of just being a useless melee templar that we are today
Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »1th im already V12, so i dont have to level..
2th Im seeing posts all over the place about templars struggeling trought even quest content they cant finish..
3th Dawn of wrath + Aedric spear are a joke in PvE and PvP..
4th They nerf our only skill worth using as a DPS skill in all 3 tree, and they nerf it because of bots..
5h Nova compared to standard DK.. its less as good, its 9 seconds instead of standard 17 seconds ??? and needs twice the freaking ultimate ???
6th You force templars to go tank/healer, because its the only tree in templar class skills that is freaking worth using ( restoring light ).. Aedric spear + Dawn of wrath, the whole tree basicly sucks.. HELP !
5th Srsly i love the game, but ZoS give us some info if you are working on templar as well, because Sorc/DK are 2 lvls higher in DPS, survivability, ultimates..
P.s and please NERF THE SORC BLINK,
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
AlexDougherty wrote: »Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »1th im already V12, so i dont have to level..
2th Im seeing posts all over the place about templars struggeling trought even quest content they cant finish..
3th Dawn of wrath + Aedric spear are a joke in PvE and PvP..
4th They nerf our only skill worth using as a DPS skill in all 3 tree, and they nerf it because of bots..
5h Nova compared to standard DK.. its less as good, its 9 seconds instead of standard 17 seconds ??? and needs twice the freaking ultimate ???
6th You force templars to go tank/healer, because its the only tree in templar class skills that is freaking worth using ( restoring light ).. Aedric spear + Dawn of wrath, the whole tree basicly sucks.. HELP !
5th Srsly i love the game, but ZoS give us some info if you are working on templar as well, because Sorc/DK are 2 lvls higher in DPS, survivability, ultimates..
P.s and please NERF THE SORC BLINK,
Nightblade needs fixing more. I play all four classes and Nightblade is the weakest. Templars need some fixing, but Nightblades need loads of fixing.
As for nerfing another class, shame on you, asking for your class to be fixed OK, sabotaging another not ok.
Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »And templars/NB are standing at the side line while those 2 classes are fighting it out..
What about this ? Templars + NB... DELETE !!! and just give every1 thats one of these classes a sorc or a dk to chose from -_-
terence.caroneb17_ESO wrote: »You don't get problems with templars in PvE until VR Content (well, now you're maybe gonna get problems cause of Biting Jabs being just ***).
But in VR Content and PvP, templar as dps (and even tanking in fact, cause of Biting Jabs nerf again) is just horribly weak. Before the patch, we were weak in PvP and got our asses handed to us by every DK VR build in PvP (and Sorcs too sometimes), now it's just everywhere.
Only builds available now as VR templar now are a Healer build and Ranged dps (*** dps still, compared to sorcs and dk).
Then, they're announcing Biting Jabs will be restored as it were ... BUT with more magicka cost. Cause you know, we didn't have enough magicka costs with other skills, and we don't have any magicka management in our skills (outside a little reduction) but we're OP. One guy in the world thought Biting Jabs was OP, but this guy worked at Zenimax. Bad luck I guess.
Before, we asked for a buff of templars damage/skill trees. Now we just ask to be the weak melee templar we were a few days ago instead of just being a useless melee templar that we are today
Nickdorlandb16_ESO wrote: »And templars/NB are standing at the side line while those 2 classes are fighting it out..
What about this ? Templars + NB... DELETE !!! and just give every1 thats one of these classes a sorc or a dk to chose from -_-
Pretty much sums it up. Hell, even in Trials, its already a massive problem to get a group if you are not Sorc or DK. NB is completely out and templar can only get one if fully specced for healing.
tankqullb16_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
i do somehow agree but the reason for this aint better healing
sustainted healing: sorc >>> Temp
raw heal power: Sorc << Temp
in summ: sorc > Temp.
tankqullb16_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
i do somehow agree but the reason for this aint better healing
sustainted healing: sorc >>> Temp
raw heal power: Sorc << Temp
in summ: sorc > Temp.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
Please tell my why that you feel that way. What do sorcerers have access to that makes them better healers?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
Please tell my why that you feel that way. What do sorcerers have access to that makes them better healers?
While it's true we have more heals at our disposal, our magicka reg is lacking vs sorc. In beta, templars were better healers.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
Please tell my why that you feel that way. What do sorcerers have access to that makes them better healers?
While it's true we have more heals at our disposal, our magicka reg is lacking vs sorc. In beta, templars were better healers.
Like I said up above, at lower levels, yes, the sorc does have the magicka regen on us. However, when you get yourself put together correctly.... boom you can heal all day, and toss volcanic runes around like its nobody's business. Regen is not an issue.
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
Please tell my why that you feel that way. What do sorcerers have access to that makes them better healers?
While it's true we have more heals at our disposal, our magicka reg is lacking vs sorc. In beta, templars were better healers.
Like I said up above, at lower levels, yes, the sorc does have the magicka regen on us. However, when you get yourself put together correctly.... boom you can heal all day, and toss volcanic runes around like its nobody's business. Regen is not an issue.
It is for some people. I use seducer/willow full legendary with warlock jewelry. For those that dont have 300k it makes things way harder. Sorc has better lift off and the gear you speak of is also useable by sorcs, which we both agree has better mag reg.
thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »thomas.k.grayb14_ESO wrote: »Follow the streams on twitch and you'll find out that the 15m trial legit guilds all say sorcerers are better healers. NB and templar not needed. Erlexx is a templar with respected builds on foundry and says all the time Sorcerer this and DK is OP that. ZOS promotes this guy but apparently dont give a *** about feedback from him or forums.
And no, sorcs are not better healers than templars. Players that made poor decisions in building their class make bad healers.
Yes they are. But thats my opinion.
Please tell my why that you feel that way. What do sorcerers have access to that makes them better healers?
While it's true we have more heals at our disposal, our magicka reg is lacking vs sorc. In beta, templars were better healers.
Like I said up above, at lower levels, yes, the sorc does have the magicka regen on us. However, when you get yourself put together correctly.... boom you can heal all day, and toss volcanic runes around like its nobody's business. Regen is not an issue.
It is for some people. I use seducer/willow full legendary with warlock jewelry. For those that dont have 300k it makes things way harder. Sorc has better lift off and the gear you speak of is also useable by sorcs, which we both agree has better mag reg.
Yes gear is available to both, and sure they have better regen.... but when regen is not a problem, how are they better healers?
Ragnar_Lodbrok wrote: »Templars do more dps than DK's.