ezareth_ESO wrote: »I wasn't aware that Alacrity was the Vamp Emp guild you were discussing. As far as I know only one of them is a vampire but I've only talked to them once and I heard them laughing about how terrible vampires are (which I agree with unless you're NB).
So take your 90 people and add the regulars who still exist on Volendrung and you have over 100. "Zergs" to me are both fodder and too difficult to organize into true organization. Take the two "Zergs" who assaulted BRK to dethrone murder last. They had no real coordination or strategy, just sort of mindlessly following each other (often to their deaths). That's the type of garbage I like to avoid in PVP. When I play in Wabba I play between the keeps picking off small groups of players and avoid the Zergs. It's just not fun. You can't kill anyone or do anything as an individual when there are 40 people who can heal your target or chase you down. Boring Zergfest.
I never said they where a Vampire VR guild. So don't add words to what I typed. Also, this is siege warfare, You don't take keeps in this style of PVP unless you have little to no opposition. Which we had a lot when we first came to the server. Also.... we haven't had 90 people for a long time... so again stop twisting what I typed. We had maybe 50 people, add about 20-30 people that where out side the guild to that and maybe even 10 of them joined our groups. Where you are getting confused is when we take the field each group does something different and has different objectives as a whole. We may send in a Deep runner group that heads south just to cut off supplies and travel routes to the north while we have another group that starts taking the keeps. This isn't zerg mentality, it's called large scale tactics. We look at the whole map, then come up with a strategy for each group with goals on how to take the whole map as fast as possible while hindering the oppositions ability to react. Go read ancient battle tactics some time. You'll see we use the same strategies as they did. Divide, overwhelm, conquer.
As far as you not liking "Zergfest" pvp, you are really kinda in the wrong game then. I love small scale PVP, I also love large scale PVP that is organized. Which it is when I run with my guild. I do not run with the mindless horde when my guild does events. There is no strategy there just mindless "kill them with numbers" mentality. The "last" time MT was dethroned our guild had already left. So if what you saw at BRK was not the organized group that was there at the beginning of the night.
The problem with Alacrity is that they are well past a 1% and in the .5% of the total population in gear, level, and emperor line. They are really to strong as a small 15 man fighting group for any "zerg" to deal with atm unless you can front a 200-300 man group against them, or a 40-50 man full VR 5-12 group. A group that is all VR 12's and organized would probably be able to go toe to toe with them on a even playing field. Atm most players that are in PVP are between the levels of 30 and VR1, which does little to help against them. All they are is AP batteries and nothing more.
anewel2011b14_ESO wrote: »wow I have never heard so much whining and crying lmao. boo hoo they have a zerg omg did you not read the game description before you ordered it 100 vs 100 pvp battles! Is it anyone elses fault you can't get people out to pvp with you? Sounds like maybe they don't like you to me. You all must be like what 8 or something grow up grow a pair suck it up be a man (or woman) deal with it. ITS WAR IT IS NOT SUPPOST TO BE FAIR! lmao most laughs I have had all morning.
wafcatb14_ESO wrote: »We have a lot of members however not all picked EP as their faction , so because of that there are certain servers we don`t play on since we have guildes on the oppsite faction on those servers and don`t fight on servers they are on .
anewel2011b14_ESO wrote: »wow I have never heard so much whining and crying lmao. boo hoo they have a zerg omg did you not read the game description before you ordered it 100 vs 100 pvp battles! Is it anyone elses fault you can't get people out to pvp with you? Sounds like maybe they don't like you to me. You all must be like what 8 or something grow up grow a pair suck it up be a man (or woman) deal with it. ITS WAR IT IS NOT SUPPOST TO BE FAIR! lmao most laughs I have had all morning.
It would lend credit to your opinion if you could spell. The worst part is the forums have a spell check built in. I guess you're one of the bad players; oh I mean bad spellers.
ezareth_ESO wrote: »Well it happened yet again. Painstakingly spent 20 hours taking the map back in Cyrodiil with all local AD. Wake up 4 hours later to find DC called in 150 people from both EP + DC again....off-campaign zerg strikes swarm strikes again.
I had 22 people in our group at peak. There are so many people on DC and EP that I've never seen before I can't differentiate the players from the off-campaign zergs.
Has there been a single Emperor on Volendrung other than Murder Thumbs in the past 2 months that actually earned the title? No.
Red and Blue haven't seriously fought each other for what a month now? Too busy sucking each other off for PVE-titles. DC can own the entire map for a week and you don't hear a single squeak out of EP.
NeeScrolls wrote: »ezareth_ESO wrote: »Well it happened yet again. Painstakingly spent 20 hours taking the map back in Cyrodiil with all local AD. Wake up 4 hours later to find DC called in 150 people from both EP + DC again....off-campaign zerg strikes swarm strikes again.
I had 22 people in our group at peak. There are so many people on DC and EP that I've never seen before I can't differentiate the players from the off-campaign zergs.
Has there been a single Emperor on Volendrung other than Murder Thumbs in the past 2 months that actually earned the title? No.
Red and Blue haven't seriously fought each other for what a month now? Too busy sucking each other off for PVE-titles. DC can own the entire map for a week and you don't hear a single squeak out of EP.
@ezareth_ESO
hey Eza, couple things:
1) i was *offline* all day today (until now)
2) there are really only a handful of true dedicated EP players (myself included) who have considered Volendrung as our HOME campaign since Week 1
3) obviously , i not only disagree with your statement about "no one but MT has earned *Emperor* in 2 months" but i'm also somewhat offended by the proclamation. However, despite our chats, i realize now that i'll probably never be able to convince you of the fact that i for one definitely earned Emperor for EP during those fortunate 5 days of 'reign' i had.
I know, and most everyone knows, how hard i worked (as low-level btw) to achieve Emperor status (and now back to # 1 ) , all the while doing everything i could possibly continue to do in trying to *lead* EP against a nearly impossible underdog point-total.
Did i have help? Of course i did. But to say that no one but MT "earned" Emperor is imo disrespectful to me personally (and those EP faithful who supported me & our side) .
4) Lastly, rest assured: I fight BOTH sides. No matter what. I kill AD & DC, as best that i can. Period. I have no 'allegiance' with anyone (except PACT) .
As always, i speak for only myself. And my *actions* speak loud enough.
./bow, Nee
p.s. I hear you and mostly agree with a lot of your opinions/complaints regarding ESO Dev team's screwing up what could have been a truly awesome PVP system (and area) .
For the record we were not in any way coordinating with EP. Matter of fact they tried to ninja cap 6th keep soon as we got emp. They followed up by trying to ninja a scroll which luckily I spotted and called in the troops to defend.
However you have a very valid point on the AOE 6 man target nerf, it makes no logical sense and needs to go. I fully agree with you that zergs win especially ones that stay real tight and it's a result of that fail mechanic, it needs to be changed.
Sorry bro feel your pain, been there done that. Still hate you always owning me EZ haha.
-Kor
ezareth_ESO wrote: »NeeScrolls wrote: »ezareth_ESO wrote: »Well it happened yet again. Painstakingly spent 20 hours taking the map back in Cyrodiil with all local AD. Wake up 4 hours later to find DC called in 150 people from both EP + DC again....off-campaign zerg strikes swarm strikes again.
I had 22 people in our group at peak. There are so many people on DC and EP that I've never seen before I can't differentiate the players from the off-campaign zergs.
Has there been a single Emperor on Volendrung other than Murder Thumbs in the past 2 months that actually earned the title? No.
Red and Blue haven't seriously fought each other for what a month now? Too busy sucking each other off for PVE-titles. DC can own the entire map for a week and you don't hear a single squeak out of EP.
@ezareth_ESO
hey Eza, couple things:
1) i was *offline* all day today (until now)
2) there are really only a handful of true dedicated EP players (myself included) who have considered Volendrung as our HOME campaign since Week 1
3) obviously , i not only disagree with your statement about "no one but MT has earned *Emperor* in 2 months" but i'm also somewhat offended by the proclamation. However, despite our chats, i realize now that i'll probably never be able to convince you of the fact that i for one definitely earned Emperor for EP during those fortunate 5 days of 'reign' i had.
I know, and most everyone knows, how hard i worked (as low-level btw) to achieve Emperor status (and now back to # 1 ) , all the while doing everything i could possibly continue to do in trying to *lead* EP against a nearly impossible underdog point-total.
Did i have help? Of course i did. But to say that no one but MT "earned" Emperor is imo disrespectful to me personally (and those EP faithful who supported me & our side) .
4) Lastly, rest assured: I fight BOTH sides. No matter what. I kill AD & DC, as best that i can. Period. I have no 'allegiance' with anyone (except PACT) .
As always, i speak for only myself. And my *actions* speak loud enough.
./bow, Nee
p.s. I hear you and mostly agree with a lot of your opinions/complaints regarding ESO Dev team's screwing up what could have been a truly awesome PVP system (and area) .
@NeeScrolls
Winning the title should mean you actually passed someone on your campaign to hit the #1 spot and the ONLY Emperor still playing on Volendrung to actually do that right now is Murder Thumbs. I also think that an Emperor should be someone who is actually able to turn their alliance into a force to take control of the map, not call in zergs from off campaign to do it for you.
, we played the game as it should be played.
It's my view of the achievement and what it *should* be, I don't blame you for not sharing it.
ezareth_ESO wrote: »For the record we were not in any way coordinating with EP. Matter of fact they tried to ninja cap 6th keep soon as we got emp. They followed up by trying to ninja a scroll which luckily I spotted and called in the troops to defend.
However you have a very valid point on the AOE 6 man target nerf, it makes no logical sense and needs to go. I fully agree with you that zergs win especially ones that stay real tight and it's a result of that fail mechanic, it needs to be changed.
Sorry bro feel your pain, been there done that. Still hate you always owning me EZ haha.
-Kor
Well when your group parked alongside EP on our last keep without fighting them the point on whether one side called in the other becomes arbitrary. EP had nothing to gain by dethroning us as DC is by far the campaign point leaders, and giving the keep to you gave you Emperor instead of us.
I'll call a spade a spade where I see one.
Just wish I had a good 60 minutes repose to farm a few damn herbs.
Also, Nee certainly deserved Emperor. Nee has been by far one of the most important players on EP Vol. Nee's probably lead more pug groups then anyone else on the server, and Ep would have been dead a loooong time ago without Nee.
NeeScrolls wrote: »@ezareth_ESO
But that's just it: i DO share your opinion.
I have been playing the Cyrodiil 'game' the proper way (imho) since Week 1.
I never made any "deals" with any opposing factions, like many others did from EP. I never had any help at all (except for the normal grouping with other Pact players) during my climb to # 1 . No one ever "gave" me kills.
The only reason i called in "zergs" on that fateful night was because the 'PC' guild came in and i knew if i didn't rally the troops ASAP , i'd get passed by their entire guild of 20-30 Vet12 farmers who were GUEST'ing and only wanted to locust our server for trading Emps amongst themselves.
I'm just ONE player...low-level player at that. How could i possibly contend with a guild of Vet12's? No matter how much i worked/earned. I was making 25k alliance-points per day. They could make 250k per day.
So, i made a decision in the moment (using PC's help and another guild's help) that i thought at the time would be beneficial to our PACT side and would take advantage of a rare opportunity to really LEAD our side and galvanize our entire server. And it worked...for a few days.
And umm btw I did "pass people" on my way up to # 1 . Plenty of people. Like 999 people in fact lol. It's not my fault that May Queen (and other empty-Emps) CHOSE to leave the server.
Nor is it my fault if certain EP players aren't logged in when i'm Online killing enemies and gaining alliance-points.
Yet somehow, for whatever reason, you're refusing to give me deserved credit for what i clearly earned , just because i'm not as powerful (nor Dragonknight'd) as MT lol.
That's like saying Kobe Bryant sucks cuz he isn't Michael Jordan. Or Roger Federer winning the French Open doesn't mean crap cuz he didn't beat Rafael Nadal that one time. Or the San Antonion Spurs '99 Championship is worthless cuz it was during a "strike shortened season" .
Heck, how do you know that if i had chosen Dragonknight + Vampire (and level'd super fast to Vet12 ) , instead of Sorceror/Werewolf (without ever barely leaving Cyrodiil at all to level ) , how do you know our side couldn't have dominated like MT did? Or at least competed more consistantly (and not had so many quit the server cuz of MT's perceived "exploiting over-powered bs " lol.
And then, ask yourself this: If my path to Emperor was just so easy, spoon-fed, and unworthy, how come I'M the ONLY one who did it ? How come I'M the only one still at # 1 ? How come I'M the only level 38 Emperor in the history of Volendrung (or other servers maybe) ?
Yet MT is the only player who truly "earned" Emp?! I dunno dude, that sounds like a combination of your AD bias w/ some traces of your own bitterness of not being able to get Emp (this campaign) , combined w/ your obvious displeasure (which i share) about how most people have bastardized the whole 'system' thru exploits & emp-sharing manipulation.
So blame the ESO dev team, not someone like me.
Anyways, like i said: I doubt i'll ever convince you. But i'll be damned if i let you just spew superior claims trying to discredit or diminish what everyone else knows i earned (albeit not in the same way as the great MT did ) .
Eza: do u really think there's something terribly wrong with calling in "help" (EP allies btw) sometimes to flip some Keeps when nearly all of my server had already abandoned it. Am i not allowed, as Former Emperor, to call in reinforcements? Like any good General/Leader would do in a War?
Look man, you seem to be venting a lot, which is fine, but imo the fact that you're including me of all people in this venting is both misguided and misdiagnosed.
I know i'm not as skilled as MT (nor You) but it's a long running game (hopefully) and i'm learning new things every day in Cyrodiil. Plus, tonite i finally hit Vet Rank 1 .
Put yourself in EP's shoes.
It would have been utterly stupid for us to attack DC since our goal was to take that keep.
Also, Nee certainly deserved Empress. Nee has been by far one of the most important players on EP Vol. Nee's probably lead more pug groups then anyone else on the server, and Ep would have been dead a loooong time ago without Nee.
Though that largely only delayed the inevitable. Since most servers are dead now.
People like to blame the players jumping ship when they are losing, but that's not the real problem. The problem lies in that you essentially cannot do anything in a campaign with pugs until you have at least 15 players due to the super buff NPCs. What pug joining a campaign is going to sit around and wait until another 14 other random people join up when they can just hop to Wabba instead. Outside of either a large guild on a server or a guild that just never sleeps servers have no fate besides to just die.
Only Zeni is to blame for this. This is solely a game design mistake. Condensing the servers will help during more active hours by just saturating the servers, but the same issue will happen at night where guilds night cap servers without competition because all the pugs have to all migrate to one server because you cannot do anything on a server until you hit that magic number.