kendellking_chaosb14_ESO wrote: »

alexkdd99 wrote: »

It was raised for a reason. Also it was not that long ago that it was raised.

It was super cheap and strong.

That's not a fair view though other Damaging Ultimates hits more people or with overload hits over and over. Templars Sweep does just a little less damage but is an AoE with a DoT, Dragon Knights have Leap now undodgable, unblockable and Rollable with the same CC that hits six people and still had AoE damage on top of all that.

Incap is can be blocked, rolled and dodged with miss chance on top of being single target.

This right here. Incap should not have had a cost increase; especially considering how often it misses.

alexkdd99 wrote: »

It was raised for a reason. Also it was not that long ago that it was raised.

It was super cheap and strong.

yes, raised for the reason of pvp because it was very often spammable with huge damage with debufss when you finally hit, did missed....and for pvp it will be enough for those QQ players if it will hit like a wet noodle but just with debuffs at 50 ulti cost and only at 100+, 200 ulti stored will hit like a truck into single target so it wont be spammable to hit like a truck like aoe from destro ulti costing not much more..250 ulti haha balance

mcb123 wrote: »

Don't change my precious incap.

so can you tell us about others ults then? I just want to get back my 50 ult cost incap just for debuffs on pve because this raise to 70 on at all the worse class to dps....is hurting, especially on dung bosses when they are just melting, after used ulti on start and maybe my 1st incap in fight thne its time for finishers but waaaait, after dring pot to ulti regen I have this 50 ult for finishers but now it cost 70 ulti and buss is dying before I will get my next incap for finishers!

its sad how weak is incap in compare to every other ult which is hitting or similiar damage or huge damage in dot and in aoe and its doesnt matter if it cost this 100 or 250 ult, those ults are hitting aoe while incap only single target ehh....balance working as intended

Edziu wrote: »

do you remember days when incap at 50 ulti cost had low damage but with more ult up to 200 it was dealing high damage as now for 70 ult?

maybe we need to get it back, at 50 ult cost it will hit like wet noddle but keep debuffs etc and with more ulti stored this will hit harder, pve wont suffer this becaus eon pve its mainly for debufss used and on pvp people should stop complain about faste ulti with hard hit with many debuffs.

you will have to choose on pvp, or chep ulti for debufs yor opponent or store your ulti for hard hit which cant be spammale because it wil cost you more ulti to store to hit hard

This is the English forum.

Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »

@Edziu
As for the one shot comment I was refering to

Mady wrote: »

It always dealt high damage. Back in those days you could one hit everything from stealth if you had full ulti.
No other skill was able to do that.

maybe but it must be long ago when battlespiit was reducing only 20% incoming damag eon pvp instead of 50% like we have now?

I remember when I was able to 1shot people from just snipe lol so that was very old days
now its impossible to 1shot with it and my idea is to get back 50 ult cost incap but like on start with cheap cost it will hit like wet noodle and damage as we have now for 70 ult will cost you maybe 150 stored ult

MaxwellC wrote: »

No incap is fine now although the ultimate should be 100, you can drink a potion gain ultimate, in combat gain ultimate, and kill someone and gain ultimate even faster.
Incap provides what 2 or 3 benefits + hits like a truck and you want the ultimate lowered while maintaining those benefits lmao.. Incap still buffs your proc sets by 20% so yet again no it's ok at best the way it is now.

maybe its fine for you on pvp, for me on pve is not
50 ult cost was fine, 70 not, as I wrote before, in dung bosses 50 ult was awesome with generate ult and drink potion when need, now especially on finishersh phase I dont have time to use incap strike because also if I drink potion I will have then this 50 ult and need 20 more to use ult, ok, I will generate 20 more ulti to 70 to use it but then its just time waste because boss have tat low health, just 2-3 hits to die

raise it to 100 ulti...are you that arrogant? then raise destro ult cost to 400+ because it also hitting like truck, its aoe and can follow you while you can spam other abilities while its active
incap buffs proc sets damage by 20%..so problem is with damn proc sets like always since they was implemented, before proc sets nobody was crying about incap, you are so arrogant

now with 70 incap cost I have often problem on pvp if use this incap or end my rotation and wait for more ult to dawnbreaker instead of incap

@LadyLavina here I QQ about nb pve...I as nb have and I never had problem with incap at all now I just want to get back this damn 50 ult cost for just debuffs for pve for nb while on pvp it will just hit weaker for 50 ult but still with debufs or will hit hard if you have stored 100+ ulti to incap.

this will unnefr nb incap for pve while on pvp wont be more qq about nb and hitting like truck often spammable incap, if you want spamm incap it will mainly debuff target and hit weak, if you want also hit hard then store more ulti, 100 or more and incap will hit harder than on weak 50 ult

Isellskooma wrote: »

Strider_Roshin wrote: »

Isellskooma wrote: »

Incap should be 200 ult.

Only if it's undodgeable, and it guarantees that I kill anyone I use it on. It'll be an expensive ultimate so it's OPness would be justified. Isn't that the BS magicka users gave for the destro ult?

L2P issue

as I see on your signature you are one of those who have l2p issue with any other also with noob nb on pvp because you dont know hot to dodge/block harder attack from squishy class?

Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »

No skill should ever be able to one shot people.

Strider_Roshin wrote: »

Isellskooma wrote: »

Incap should be 200 ult.

Only if it's undodgeable, and it guarantees that I kill anyone I use it on. It'll be an expensive ultimate so it's OPness would be justified. Isn't that the BS magicka users gave for the destro ult?

Ay, just that that the destro ult:
-costs more than 200 Ultimate
-doesn't add major defile
-doesn't grant you 20% increase damage
-is a DoT, so it can't inflict damage in a burst
But it's an AoE you can walk out of. so....

-Destro ult can kill a zerg. Incap can potentially kill one person from stealth.
-The amount of constant damage the destro ult pumps out is far more superior than major defile.
-Yes it's a DoT that does damage similar to incap every second to everyone within the radius.
-Yes you can walk out of it if the player activated EotS, and then suddenly went AFK. Otherwise expect to be followed, CC'd, rooted, and damaged as you're running for your life.

Edziu wrote: »

Isellskooma wrote: »

Strider_Roshin wrote: »

Isellskooma wrote: »

Incap should be 200 ult.

Only if it's undodgeable, and it guarantees that I kill anyone I use it on. It'll be an expensive ultimate so it's OPness would be justified. Isn't that the BS magicka users gave for the destro ult?

L2P issue

as I see on your signature you are one of those who have l2p issue with any other also with noob nb on pvp because you dont know hot to dodge/block harder attack from squishy class?

I main Nightblade bro, if I get ambushed I either dodge/block. I'm just trolling the forums, no one here knows what balance is so I come up with stupid ideas, people get triggered cause they think I'm serious cause everyone who says stuff like that are actually serious.