ralphylauren wrote: »get rekt.
If these are some of the people I'm thinking of. . . then some of them paid upwards of $150 USD for that vAS clear.
Folks willing to cheat their way through a videogame, or the amount of people looking for an easy ride - makes me lose faith in the human race. Think about if these are people you might work with in real life, of worse - work FOR.
people with such low moral values theyre willing to cheat the system, or step on others to get to the top. Good riddance.
Wait time out you never seen American Greed? People cheat everyday in life to get ahead, especially in business. Businesses is cut throat by nature. Besides this is a VIDEO GAME, if people purchased the game then invested time into it and then decide to cheat that’s on them.
And if cheating in a video game makes you “loose faith in the human race” you really need to re-evaluate life
wait. . . what exactly are you saying? that this is normal behavior and I should accept that people will lie cheat and steal their way to the top?
and you're telling me i have to re-evaluate my life?
NordSwordnBoard wrote: »The immaturity of some of the exploit defenders is kind of sad. Echoing what the people they respect say, maybe they should re-examine who they look up to.
Anybody who can think for themselves knew it was an exploit.
The ones long ago or are there some currently happening.SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
I'm not a dev but I made a dumb forum thread about it a while back (warning, terrible math)Waiting to see all the exploiters flood to the forums to complain that they were wrongfully banned/suspended or blame ZOS for allowing the exploit to exist in the first place.
There is this saying that the "forums are 1% of the ESO population." A year ago or so, there was this dev post that confirmed it's actually somewhere around 0.01%. So if 1000 people exploited, chances that they are on the forums are pretty slim.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/358277/forums-is-1-of-games-population
The ones long ago or are there some currently happening.SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
Whilst I am not happy people abused and got away with it it's only been in the last year and a half that ZOS really stepped up and worked to fight exploiting in this way.
If it is happening now there is a better chance of it being stopped.
SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
I would love for them to be banned. All of them. You seem to think most everyone sniped vMoL, though, so does that include you as well?
SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
I would love for them to be banned. All of them. You seem to think most everyone sniped vMoL, though, so does that include you as well?
Lmao so if i make an absolute true statement i must be guilty as well................wow this game is dying
norebb16_ESO wrote: »Players didnt take advantage of an exploit, they took advantage of the devs laziness which is easy to document. These glitches are reported clearly or this conversation wouldnt be happening. Ive personally reported several of the imp city ones ages ago but they haven't fixed any yet.
Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
I would love for them to be banned. All of them. You seem to think most everyone sniped vMoL, though, so does that include you as well?
Lmao so if i make an absolute true statement i must be guilty as well................wow this game is dying
I didn't say that. 95% is a big number, though. Also, lmao.
SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
I would love for them to be banned. All of them. You seem to think most everyone sniped vMoL, though, so does that include you as well?
Lmao so if i make an absolute true statement i must be guilty as well................wow this game is dying
I didn't say that. 95% is a big number, though. Also, lmao.
So take a step back, only 1% of the population does endgame trials, and considering you have to buy an instance to snipe the last boss. Yes I would assume my prior comment valid. I myself have sold said instances for gold to groups of under equipped players which is not against the ToS. What they do with said instance is none of my business. But I will say this those runs where exploited in some form or fashion.
Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »Shad0wfire99 wrote: »SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »So is no one going to answer that simple question where are the BANS for vMAW snipers.....you know who you are lol
I would love for them to be banned. All of them. You seem to think most everyone sniped vMoL, though, so does that include you as well?
Lmao so if i make an absolute true statement i must be guilty as well................wow this game is dying
I didn't say that. 95% is a big number, though. Also, lmao.
So take a step back, only 1% of the population does endgame trials, and considering you have to buy an instance to snipe the last boss. Yes I would assume my prior comment valid. I myself have sold said instances for gold to groups of under equipped players which is not against the ToS. What they do with said instance is none of my business. But I will say this those runs where exploited in some form or fashion.
Ok. Ban them too. And the ones that sold them the instance knowing good and well what they were going to do with it.
SIRPORKCHOPS wrote: »NordSwordnBoard wrote: »The immaturity of some of the exploit defenders is kind of sad. Echoing what the people they respect say, maybe they should re-examine who they look up to.
Anybody who can think for themselves knew it was an exploit.
Ok so you know people glitch sniped vMaw where are the bans for them?
Greetings, we've removed several comments for baiting, flaming, and personal insults. This is a friendly reminder to read through our forum rules to make sure what you're posting isn't in violation of any of our rules. In the situation where you come across a comment that you believe might be in violation of the rules, please flag the comment for moderator review and do not engage with the post. Flagging a comment and taunting the member will only result in your own account being actioned. Thank you for your understanding.
ralphylauren wrote: »ralphylauren wrote: »get rekt.
If these are some of the people I'm thinking of. . . then some of them paid upwards of $150 USD for that vAS clear.
Folks willing to cheat their way through a videogame, or the amount of people looking for an easy ride - makes me lose faith in the human race. Think about if these are people you might work with in real life, of worse - work FOR.
people with such low moral values theyre willing to cheat the system, or step on others to get to the top. Good riddance.
Wait time out you never seen American Greed? People cheat everyday in life to get ahead, especially in business. Businesses is cut throat by nature. Besides this is a VIDEO GAME, if people purchased the game then invested time into it and then decide to cheat that’s on them.
And if cheating in a video game makes you “loose faith in the human race” you really need to re-evaluate life
wait. . . what exactly are you saying? that this is normal behavior and I should accept that people will lie cheat and steal their way to the top?
and you're telling me i have to re-evaluate my life?
Bruh I never said what you had to accept but 90% of you people in here on a false moral high horse. All I was trying to illustrate was that this IS A VIDEO GAME. I swear when I read stuff like this it always reminds me “He who is without sin, cast the first stone”.
It’s like a lot of your people forget about the rl skeletons in your own closets. So 90% of you moral cops can miss me with all your fake “outrage” over a digital world being cheated.
Correct me if I'm wrong: permaban for an "exploit" like this would be overkilling. Not just in a moral sense but in legal sense as well.
In a game the possibilities of a gamer is controlled by the code. What the official code allows you is legal to do as part of the game content and features. If the game doesn't want me to jump off a cliff, an invisbile wall will be put there to prevent me doing so. If the game doesn't want to allow me to steal from sacks in a fence, it will not be clickable.
Everything I can do in a game, the code is responsible for it.
If there's a glitch in the game and the player plays on it, it's again the responsibility of the code and the coder. ZOS can not redirect this responsibility to the player through shady legal text called "terms and conditions". A computer game is a product which also falls under the legal regulations of trading so it has to be fit for purpose in any given moment and should not be misused. However misusing it does not mean one can be deprived from the accessibility (especially not permanently) maybe losing warranty.
In this case I see no harm done to the game community and also this is not an illegal use of the program code as the code has not been breached, nor hacked. The player played what the code allowed him to do without using any third party code (like with add-ons, khm, which are now feature for some reason even if it affects everyone else's gameplay big deal) or without affecting the game of anyone else in the virtual world.
So I'd reconsider this overly reactive permaban otherwise any given player could successfully run a lawsuit against ZOS any time.
BadSerpico wrote: »Zosssss!
Correct me if I'm wrong: permaban for an "exploit" like this would be overkilling. Not just in a moral sense but in legal sense as well.
In a game the possibilities of a gamer is controlled by the code. What the official code allows you is legal to do as part of the game content and features. If the game doesn't want me to jump off a cliff, an invisbile wall will be put there to prevent me doing so. If the game doesn't want to allow me to steal from sacks in a fence, it will not be clickable.
Everything I can do in a game, the code is responsible for it.
If there's a glitch in the game and the player plays on it, it's again the responsibility of the code and the coder. ZOS can not redirect this responsibility to the player through shady legal text called "terms and conditions". A computer game is a product which also falls under the legal regulations of trading so it has to be fit for purpose in any given moment and should not be misused. However misusing it does not mean one can be deprived from the accessibility (especially not permanently) maybe losing warranty.
In this case I see no harm done to the game community and also this is not an illegal use of the program code as the code has not been breached, nor hacked. The player played what the code allowed him to do without using any third party code (like with add-ons, khm, which are now feature for some reason even if it affects everyone else's gameplay big deal) or without affecting the game of anyone else in the virtual world.
So I'd reconsider this overly reactive permaban otherwise any given player could successfully run a lawsuit against ZOS any time.
Nothing more insightful than a armchair lawyer. Tell me again which law school you graduated from?