cjmarsh725b14_ESO wrote: »@Evandus
I see, you're a fan, not a member of the guild. My apologies to ER for tarnishing their reputation with your arrogance in my eyes. I don't know how else to tell you what I think about this issue without beating a dead horse, so I'll just leave it there. Maybe you'll go back and actually read through what I wrote, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
cjmarsh725b14_ESO wrote: »@Evandus
I see, you're a fan, not a member of the guild. My apologies to ER for tarnishing their reputation with your arrogance in my eyes. I don't know how else to tell you what I think about this issue without beating a dead horse, so I'll just leave it there. Maybe you'll go back and actually read through what I wrote, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
I agree. You should stop name calling and produce something actionable if you wish for your opinions to be held in higher esteem by the community managers.
I can tell you from being on the PTS before launch that we complained about pretty much exactly the same things as everyone else. And we warned the developers of how the community was going to react if they left things the way they were. They didn't listen to us.
I can also tell you that they didn't talk to us on the PTS either. Mostly it was Gina or Jess who talked to us. Occasionally we got Kai Schober or Michael Servotte to pop in with a comment. Once in a while Paul Sage would post something. But we never had back and forth conversations with any of the developers that people seem to think happened on the PTS.
We complained, sometimes we whined a lot. In the end, ZOS did what they wanted.
The devs being very hush hush about what is going on with the game is nothing new.
For what it's worth, we did try to make the game better.
Phantorang wrote: »cjmarsh725b14_ESO wrote: »@Evandus
I see, you're a fan, not a member of the guild. My apologies to ER for tarnishing their reputation with your arrogance in my eyes. I don't know how else to tell you what I think about this issue without beating a dead horse, so I'll just leave it there. Maybe you'll go back and actually read through what I wrote, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
I agree. You should stop name calling and produce something actionable if you wish for your opinions to be held in higher esteem by the community managers.
You claiming @cjmarsh725b14_ESO posts as rage is not name calling, while the response, calling you arrogant is?
That is a perfect example of arrogance.
Furthermore, you completely ignore the question at hand: Why does ER need to know changes to the game before anyone else?
Im not speaking for myself, I speak for the whole community, I dont think I deserve to know anything before anyone else, as opposed to you and ER who think they deserve to know before anyone else.
infraction2008b16_ESO wrote: »NakedSnake wrote: »You pay you play...end of story. Your monthly fee does not entitle you know the ins and out's of development. Next thing you'll be wanting the devs to email you before they take a ***.
Yes but it doesn't entitle guilds who are not on the payroll to the ins and out of development either, as a matter of a fact I'm sure most game companies have secrecy clauses in their employment contracts so they don't end up sharing too much information i.e. to prevent stuff like future patch notes getting leaked to other companies.
Not saying guilds like ER know what's coming in patch 1.3 and are about to leak it to NCSoft but it is a bit worrying to see they can get very specific information pretty much on demand while the rest of the community get vague responses if any.
In my opinion of course Zenimax should engage with guilds, but engaging shouldn't mean giving out such specifics like the OP mentioned or not taking individual opinions with a grain of salt like they do with the rest of the community. Letting a small circle of players get too pally with the development is not only bad for manipulation/exploitation of the development process but it also looks bad from a professional standpoint as well.
They should be treating all paying customers equal regardless of how good they are or whether they happen to run a useful community resource.
williamburr2001b14_ESO wrote: »Um, half the in-game tooltips don't accurately describe what the skills do. They're either off, mathematically, or flat-out incorrect. I would say the monthly fee "entitles" one to a working product, one that behaves as described. What's going on now is not that. The hidden maths, the ones that are currently being argued and complained about, the ones that are the Game That IS, not the Game As We Are Told, are available to some, but not others, and certainly not all.
That seems...grey enough to be worth commenting on. I have no idea why you'd bother putting forth this effort basically telling people they're powerless and unimportant and they should shut up.
Arsenic_Touch wrote: »This could've easily been avoided if green posts on this forum actually regularly responded too questions and pages, but even pms go ignored and that's what fuels these sort of gripes.
How often do you see a thread with your particular issue and see that a staff member posted only to find its a reprimand or a thread closure o thread move and has nothing actually related to the original discussion? Too many by my count.
I have two pms currently with no responses and numerous threads that have been ignored or receive no follow up. I'm sure others feel slighted as well.
We have a paging system where the recipients often ignore the pages. These things need to change. I can bet that this thread would've been a non issues if zenimax actually took a more active role around here.
I refuse to answer the question at hand, instead Im trying to derail the discussion
deathsdoor_rift2_ESO wrote: »Get involved with the PTS and do constructive testing and the DEVS WILL come talk to you.
[Moderator Note: Edited per our rules on Flaming]
no one should really take note of anything gisgo says, hes just here to troll people and it's pretty obvious.
Phantorang wrote: »Ralathar44 wrote: »BadgerRider1 wrote: »Receiving no communication from the company while other, "special" groups of people receive it really rankles my chain. I can deal with bugs and balancing issues, etc. but being treated as a 2nd class citizen is wholely unacceptable. The game is beautiful and fun to play but I just cant support favoritism.
Good luck all, and happy hunting.
Perfect example of my previous comment. Poster assumes something and lashes out.
Actually, you've demonstrated this entirely by your own post, @BadgerRider1 has been a part of this thread from the beginning, so to take 1 of his/hers posts out of context doesnt make it right.
Your post makes alot of sense, just not in this example.
And you're the kind of "tester" people they're giving privileged information to? Someone who can't even obey the forum rules?deathsdoor_rift2_ESO wrote: »I have posted 3 times in this thread and had all 3 edited due to Flaming they say.
Why does this have to be the case?Ralathar44 wrote: »I think people are also ignoring that there will always be situations like this. So long as they keep communicating with people, they will over time communicate more with people who seem to "know what's up".
How is managing clandestine meetings and keeping track of two sets of information ("what the chosen ones know" and "what everyone else knows") in any way more efficient than letting everyone know everything at once?This is merely efficiency.
Who wants to get punished?Of course for people with agenda's that they feel are not getting pushed like they want this is an opportunity to cause noise and get more attention. IE politics.
How is answering the questions and providing information about future changes to one group of players but not the rest not favoritism?From the information presented it would be impossible to call anything favoritism, this is just selfish forum posters pushing their own agendas and acting like children.
Why is this topic not worthy of discussion in your opinion?GrimlockSaves wrote: »Seriously, what the hell are you guys still talking about in this thread, and why? Stop writing your walls of text testaments of whatever and let this thread die.
ozgod22_eso wrote: »Devs cannot speak to everybody who asks them a question. What they do is try to speak to opinion and thought leaders in the community. It's the same in any industry or group all over the world. You can't speak to 500,000 people all playing the game or even the 5,000 that are presumably bothering to post here. You have to stratify the list somehow.
In WoW Blizzard had Ghostcrawler whose full time job became just responding to some (not all) of the endless questions people asked on Twitter. Other than him, the people that the devs spoke to the most were usually the ones that were engaged in the game other than just playing - they had organised guilds for competitive end game pvp, they had displayed knowledge of classes and game mechanics by virtue of what they had achieved in the game, and they had spent hours on the PTR testing upcoming mechanics.
Just look at some of the threads here eg "zomg I guit bolt escape has been nerfed to hell and back no point playing sorc nemore qqqqqqq" or "zomg i cant believe u are nerfing dk because all the temps qq'd about us qqqqqq" or "zomg cant u fix nightblades yet im unsubbing till u do something qqqqq". Is there really any point in engaging in constructive dialogue with these people?
ozgod22_eso wrote: »Is there really any point in engaging in constructive dialogue with these people?
ozgod22_eso wrote: »Is there really any point in engaging in constructive dialogue with these people?
They would first need to engage in any kind of dialogue before it could be determined if it was constructive or not. Also, 1 group getting answers while the other group is left in the dark is a great way to *** of the group left in the dark.
Maverick827 wrote: »Why does this have to be the case?Ralathar44 wrote: »I think people are also ignoring that there will always be situations like this. So long as they keep communicating with people, they will over time communicate more with people who seem to "know what's up".
How is managing clandestine meetings and keeping track of two sets of information ("what the chosen ones know" and "what everyone else knows") in any way more efficient than letting everyone know everything at once?This is merely efficiency.
How is answering the questions and providing information about future changes to one group of players but not the rest not favoritism?From the information presented it would be impossible to call anything favoritism, this is just selfish forum posters pushing their own agendas and acting like children.
Comments like this perplex me. No one has indicated Zeni "has to" or even "should" respond to every question asked of them, so stop being ridiculous. So you read some QQ threads, what a medal for it?
That is clearly not the type of communication that people are asking to be responded to and you know it.
Ralathar44 wrote: »When you want to know about wiring you talk primarily with people who have demonstrated a knowledge of wiring. It's as simple as that. When you contract a house one day you are going to talk to home owners and people that demonstrate that they have knowledge about building/owning a home.
You are not however going to spend the bulk of your time talking to people who have no home owning or house building experience.
Common sense.
(FYI this does actually answer your first question in case you didn't realize,)
Ralathar44 wrote: »Comments like this perplex me. No one has indicated Zeni "has to" or even "should" respond to every question asked of them, so stop being ridiculous. So you read some QQ threads, what a medal for it?
That is clearly not the type of communication that people are asking to be responded to and you know it.
Any time they don't respond to everyone is a "valid" complaint of favoritism or discrimination. That is the point. If nothing else due to time constraints some people will be either focused or neglected.
Just be glad races are anonymous on the internet or you'd have 4985674 complaints of racism lol.