After the Patriot act, no one is free. Anything you say can be defined as terrorism and you can be detained and interrogated (tortured) indefinitely. Welcome to the New World Order.
alexandru987eb17_ESO wrote: »I find it stupid anyway, if anyone can use it then all should be able to, its racist towards white people not to allow them to use it when every movie out there has black people saying it no problem. There are even songs with the name in the title...
Isn't this precisely what the ignore button is for?
You don't like what someone is saying? BAM ignored...
MasterSpatula wrote: »alexandru987eb17_ESO wrote: »I find it stupid anyway, if anyone can use it then all should be able to, its racist towards white people not to allow them to use it when every movie out there has black people saying it no problem. There are even songs with the name in the title...
You always know you're in for a treat when you read the words "racist against white people.
Let me break this down in a simple way maybe you can understand. Imagine you have a little brother. Like all siblings, you fight some times. Sometimes, you even call your little brother "[snip]."
How do you react when someone you've never met hits your little brother and calls him "[snip]?"
That's tribalism on its most fundamental level. You have different privileges with your "tribe" than those outside the tribe do, whether that tribe is your family, your nation-state, your religion, or your ethnic/racial group.
So no, it's not racist against white people to say black people can use the N-word and white people can't. Not even a little bit. It's incredibly narrow-minded and self-involved to claim that it is.
@Dusty5, since you provide no [even santisied] examples it's impossible to know if you have a point are just over-sensitive.Before anyone starts in the chat filter does not cover this. This is getting out of control and needs to be taken care of. People spamming racial attacks/slurs and attacking people of faith. Most are repeat offenders, people complain myself and others have taken screenshots and sent in reports but nothing seems to happen. Really how hard is it to investigate? seems like a no brainer to me.
GrimCyclone wrote: »*looks at topic title*
*sees three pages of posts*
Ah, the cacophony of white-guilt libbies!
nerevarine1138 wrote: »As others have mentioned, people attacking your faith is a totally separate problem from racial slurs. Everyone agrees that racial slurs should get people banned.
Your faith is a personal choice and belief system that you embrace. If you choose to bring it up in chat, you don't get to complain when it's attacked.
DenverRalphy wrote: »nerevarine1138 wrote: »Your faith is a personal choice and belief system that you embrace. If you choose to bring it up in chat, you don't get to complain when it's attacked.
Oh I dunno about that.
If somebody says something along the lines of "All @#$%!! <insert religious faction here> are the @#^$ing bane of the earth and all deserve to hang any their @#$#! for their %@#$!ing evil ways! <insert more explicit vulgarities here in any random order>"
Then yeah... I do believe they are allowed to complain.
Tannakaobi wrote: »'Your faith is a personal choice and belief system that you embrace. If you choose to bring it up in chat, you don't get to complain when it's attacked'
HelpingHand wrote: »Learn to leave faith out of conversation in an online video game, where people of all sorts of beliefs will exist, and you won't have this problem. If you bring up faith in a conversation and then you can't handle peoples responses, learn to leave it out.
@DenverRalphyDenverRalphy wrote: »The flaw here, is your assumption that he went fishing for comments. Where exactly did you come up with that conclusion?
The only way someone could attack "his choices" is if they knew about his choices in the first place ...
;-)I ... do not have to put of with someone attacking my choices.
Tannakaobi wrote: »'Your faith is a personal choice and belief system that you embrace. If you choose to bring it up in chat, you don't get to complain when it's attacked'
Expecting everyone to care that you are black / yellow / green / pink / orange / whatever color you want to call yourself is a choice as well, and your choice to embrace the color of your skin as a part of who you are is as much a choice as a person who embraces their religion as a part of who they are. Furthermore, blaming religions for causing wars is just foolish.
The Crusades - were as much a land grab as anything religious, even if the 2 were connected (Jerusalem).
World War I - had nothing to do with religion, it was a land grab.
World War II - was a land grab with the added part of trying to kill everyone of a certain religion.
Mexican War - land grab
Civil War (US, though I believe most could be this as well) - idealogic war
Coup D'etat - normally I would say this was a power hungry guy wanting more power, though in some cases it may legitimately be done to save a country from itself
All those European wars - expansion
All those massive empires from way way back, you know, like Greece under Alexander and Rome - expansion
I could go on, but why bother.
@DenverRalphyDenverRalphy wrote: »The flaw here, is your assumption that he went fishing for comments. Where exactly did you come up with that conclusion?
The only way someone could attack "his choices" is if they knew about his choices in the first place ...
;-)I ... do not have to put of with someone attacking my choices.
What is with all these assumptions?
Here are some things for you to consider.
The only time I saw anything akin to the matter discussed myself. Is when some one was off in Greenshade zone chat, and talking about immigrants in Britain. No one said anything to them about being an immigrant to the UK first. Interestingly enough, then people responded saying they had an immigrant significant other. But that person brought it up as an aside to something which had little relevance. I have seen people do it in RL too. I do not have a hard time believing people solicit their views to all sundry.
I have even seen in international communities, American players bad mouthing other countries in comparison to their own. NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT BEING FROM ANYWHERE ELSE. They just gassed off voluntarily.
So are they likely going to insult someone who is of certain descent/faith if they continue? Yes. Are people who report them all of that ethnic origin or faith? No.
And yes the OP spoke about not liking his beliefs insulted, but did he/she even say they were of any actual faith or belief. So, I had no idea what faith they did or did not have. And neither did any of you. Just rushed to score points and be right. And I suspect may be the case in some part, defend ones own intolerance. Some of the things I have seen here, match with exactly what extreme right wing propaganda says.
Tend to have zone chat off unless I play at slow hours as it make guild chat hard to read.FrauPerchta wrote: »Unless I am in a group I pretty much ignore chat.
Tannakaobi wrote: »'Your faith is a personal choice and belief system that you embrace. If you choose to bring it up in chat, you don't get to complain when it's attacked'
Expecting everyone to care that you are black / yellow / green / pink / orange / whatever color you want to call yourself is a choice as well....
I could go on, but why bother.