BretonMage wrote: »frogthroat wrote: »Elvenheart wrote: »To answer the OP’s question, it’s not that I don’t like grouping for NM. It’s just that my playtime is limited and sporadic and can be interrupted at any moment by RL issues that it’s hard for me to group because I may have to drop out at a moment’s notice and I don’t want to inconvenience other players. The only time I’ll risk it is when I think there’s a chance I won’t be interrupted long enough to finish.
The few groups I have tried in NM, they are all easy come, easy go. Just apply, get in group. Maybe say something when you leave, but not necessary. As long as you actually leave the group when you leave and not stay in the group offline.
Oh dear, what actually happens if someone forgets to leave the group before logging off? I might have been distracted enough to have done that once.
Yeah. There is definitely a certain demographic that wants solo-only easy mode game with no challenges... but certain people used to silence and drive away perceived "elitists" by calling them ableist, gatekeepers, haters etc. So many people just stopped posting due to hostile atmosphere.
Demonwolff wrote: »So Im seeing a lot of people saying "no one wanted harder" or "where's the proof people wanted" A simple search will tell you in 2025 alone over 10k players requested this change on the forums.
10,000 players? I find that hard to believe. I'm not saying a lot of players haven't requested it, but 10,000 unique players asking for this on the forums seems a lot.
Demonwolff wrote: »I'm amending this, as I had said I quickly looked this up and misread it, Its 10k over 5 years leading up to 2026. My error.
However my point still stands and clearly no one else bothered to look this up.
Demonwolff wrote: »Demonwolff wrote: »So Im seeing a lot of people saying "no one wanted harder" or "where's the proof people wanted" A simple search will tell you in 2025 alone over 10k players requested this change on the forums.
10,000 players? I find that hard to believe. I'm not saying a lot of players haven't requested it, but 10,000 unique players asking for this on the forums seems a lot.
I'm amending this, as I had said I quickly looked this up and misread it, Its 10k over 5 years leading up to 2026.
Yeah. There is definitely a certain demographic that wants solo-only easy mode game with no challenges... but certain people used to silence and drive away perceived "elitists" by calling them ableist, gatekeepers, haters etc. So many people just stopped posting due to hostile atmosphere.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Idk, I don't really see raiders or pvpers acting like sky is falling when there is a casual solo event like Jester's or New Life.
Idk, I don't really see raiders or pvpers acting like sky is falling when there is a casual solo event like Jester's or New Life. Some might skip it or say they find it boring, but that's it. I even know some rpers who skipped DB dlc due to the whole "give your soul to Sithis" thing or the Necrom dlc due disliking Telvannis. But whenever there's a pvp event or anything requiring grouping, there's always lots of complaints from solo onlys claiming that they must be able to do everything without changing their approach. Even though there is a ton of solo content already and even more on the way.
It's ok to not like every aspect of a game or a community, but it's not ok to demand that everything should be made just for one specific category of people. And the latter is what we see every time ZOS releases anything that's not questing. Both on pts and live forums.
FurryCandyHearts wrote: »Once upon a time you played a rpg to be the hero, to stop the evil and to save the land. ESO has become the place to go commit the evil and relish in it. It's disgusting!
Wait until you hear about there being a guild full of thieves that you can join (a "Thieves Guild", if you will), or a brotherhood that operates in the dark which specializes in assassinations (a "Dark Brotherhood", if you will), or a class that revolves around necromancy... :eyeroll: