And by "all pvp" you mean 4 meager hours per day of ball groups, proc sets, and instant deaths, then 20 hours of empty map PvDoor. Yeah that can die. It has run its course.JustLovely wrote: »All PvP in ESO dies if ZOS mandates vengeance.
And by "all pvp" you mean 4 meager hours per day of ball groups, proc sets, and instant deaths, then 20 hours of empty map PvDoor. Yeah that can die. It has run its course.JustLovely wrote: »All PvP in ESO dies if ZOS mandates vengeance.
And now thanks to Vengeance, I'm finally interested in returning.JustLovely wrote: »You've already quit the game for all intents and purposes.
And now thanks to Vengeance, I'm finally interested in returning.JustLovely wrote: »You've already quit the game for all intents and purposes.
I'll bet my account I'm not the only one.
You're giving me credit for ball groups, proc sets, and instant deaths? Flattering you think I have such influence. Social environment is an extension of gameplay. Toxic gameplay breeds a toxic social environment, and that's a devil's triad of toxicity that GH gameplay suffers.JustLovely wrote: »social environment you created for yourself
robertlabrie wrote: »The side-by-side test proved beyond question that GH remains popular among some players. The easy answer is to keep both Veng and GH and let ppl choose which one they want to play.
Ooooor keep it how it is and dont split the population.
And these who dont want to pvp then, didnt pvp before and are perhaps no loss to the pvp community of the game.
Not everything needs to be play the way you want.
You cant buy a etablished 10y old game and expect it to change.
If some people are „threatening“ they dont play pvp then- okay and?
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »Better PvP on the forums. Balanced meta. Populated server. Persistent action. Can't say any of that about GH, a proven failure that reduced the Cyro player base from thousands to a couple hundred. Advocate for your small pond if you must, but the ocean of Vengeance still rises.SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »You haven't logged on regularly for over two years now.
What are you going to do when ZOS mandates vengeance and you're and your wife are the only ones playing it?
JustLovely wrote: »And now thanks to Vengeance, I'm finally interested in returning.JustLovely wrote: »You've already quit the game for all intents and purposes.
I'll bet my account I'm not the only one.
You are arguing that ZOS should create content for people who don't even play ESO at this time. So why should ZOS or anyone else listen? And I think your problem, why you left the game, has more to do with the social environment you created for yourself in GH more than it does with GH vs. vengeance. Vengeance won't solve that problem.
SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »Better PvP on the forums. Balanced meta. Populated server. Persistent action. Can't say any of that about GH, a proven failure that reduced the Cyro player base from thousands to a couple hundred. Advocate for your small pond if you must, but the ocean of Vengeance still rises.SaffronCitrusflower wrote: »You haven't logged on regularly for over two years now.
What are you going to do when ZOS mandates vengeance and you're and your wife are the only ones playing it?
Somehow everyone defending Vengeance is „the only one“. There must be a double digit number of „only ones“ defending Vengeance in forum alone which according to Vengeance haters is only 1% of the playerbase.
Maybe you can gaslight yourself and outstanding players that Vengeance was empty but I had no problems finding fights in Vengeance even in offhours after GreyHost was back up and you cant convince me otherwise and ZOS has real numbers anyway.
JustLovely wrote: »And now thanks to Vengeance, I'm finally interested in returning.JustLovely wrote: »You've already quit the game for all intents and purposes.
I'll bet my account I'm not the only one.
You are arguing that ZOS should create content for people who don't even play ESO at this time. So why should ZOS or anyone else listen? And I think your problem, why you left the game, has more to do with the social environment you created for yourself in GH more than it does with GH vs. vengeance. Vengeance won't solve that problem.
Maybe these people dont play ESO at this time because they dont have the content.
You and your fellow Vengeance haters claim to not login when Vengeance is up but complain on the forum while you don’t even play ESO at this time that ZOS should shutdown Vengeance and restore Greyhost(create content) so why should anyone listen to you?
robertlabrie wrote: »As someone who has spent 1000s of hours in Cyrodiil, why is it I don't find ball groups lurking around every corner. They're not ambushing me at every resource, or popping up every time I'm on flags. Ball groups aren't jumping of the abandoned orchard, or roving in circles around Vlas preying on all who happen past. There aren't ball groups on the Alessia bridge tower swooping down like some dark vampire horde. Ball groups don't pop out of the dolmen. Yes ball groups are annoying but an almost hysterical amount of energy has been expelled complaining about something that's not a major factor.
Coordinated PVDoor guilds are far more of a nuisance and are also not the same thing at all. Seriously, someone tell me what's wrong with GH without using the phrase "ball group".
robertlabrie wrote: »Seriously, someone tell me what's wrong with GH without using the phrase "ball group".