Create a campaign as dlc that is only PvE, new quests, story, etc in cyrodil.
Keep greyhost as is.
Why do they need to remove something or change something.
Just add MORE.
Speaking of PvP. Just add old bg’s back.
Again, that was something that was replaced.
Nothing should ever be replaced. Just add more stuff.
We gamers like more stuff 👍
cyclonus11 wrote: »I think PVP should kept, but updated:
Now that the planemeld has ended, the daedra lose control of the Imperials of Cyrodiil and Imperial City. The Imperials (and those who choose to ally with them) then regroup to eliminate the remaining daedra and work to push out the invading alliances.
Proposal: Update PVP to add a fourth alliance. For Cyrodiil, have their base in the center surrounding Imperial City, but with no keeps to themselves - they have to capture the keeps from the alliances.
For Imperial City, have the faction around the tower in the center. From there, they have to push outward to capture the districts.
DarkStrifeYT wrote: »PvP populations even prior to the undaunted/vengeance events has been low and isn't like when it was years ago where there would be massive battles has died down to small groups taking keeps. With how the story currently is should cyro's pvp be removed, kept as it is, or have a suggestion that would help bring cyro back alive.
Edit:
I also should make it clear, this is mainly based on how the story is going and not just on pvp population being lowered. I myself want to see cyro keep going but made this poll out of curiosity to see how others feel about cyro and maybe bunch together a bunch of suggestions. Seeing that at the time of this edit that there is 0 votes for removal actually makes me happy to see that people still want it. This isn't about removing it entirely.
Also a bit of a theory Is the campaign called Vengeance a hint of the future story of ESOs next chapter?
(Not taking server performance into this, just cyro in general)
BXR_Lonestar wrote: »cyclonus11 wrote: »I think PVP should kept, but updated:
Now that the planemeld has ended, the daedra lose control of the Imperials of Cyrodiil and Imperial City. The Imperials (and those who choose to ally with them) then regroup to eliminate the remaining daedra and work to push out the invading alliances.
Proposal: Update PVP to add a fourth alliance. For Cyrodiil, have their base in the center surrounding Imperial City, but with no keeps to themselves - they have to capture the keeps from the alliances.
For Imperial City, have the faction around the tower in the center. From there, they have to push outward to capture the districts.
Honestly, Cyrodil is so much about pushing and holding the map when the other alliances aren't playing. So much so that having a "night crew" is really all the difference in any individual campaign. You can still own prime time, but you will still lose the campaign if you don't have a good night crew. This puts the emphasis on a small handfull of players putting in a TON of hours to win a campaign.
I'd like to see it where if the server population drops below a certain threshhold, the Imperials push out and retake the map so NOBODY has the advantage of holding the map when there aren't enough players to actually fight over objectives. That way, players don't have to worry about going and running a night crew to be competitive in a campaign.
DarkStrifeYT wrote: »Should all PvE be eliminated from ESO? Sounds great to me so maybe I should make a poll too.
Tempted to do that, nothing but open world pvp from here on
Its mostly just out of curiosity and a discussion. Especially with how the story is going but who knows could be a new war in the future.
DarkStrifeYT wrote: »Should all PvE be eliminated from ESO? Sounds great to me so maybe I should make a poll too.
Tempted to do that, nothing but open world pvp from here on
Its mostly just out of curiosity and a discussion. Especially with how the story is going but who knows could be a new war in the future.
I really don’t know about that, but I truly believe that if ZOS removed PvP from ESO, PvE would be 100% better for sure.
DarkStrifeYT wrote: »Should all PvE be eliminated from ESO? Sounds great to me so maybe I should make a poll too.
Tempted to do that, nothing but open world pvp from here on
Its mostly just out of curiosity and a discussion. Especially with how the story is going but who knows could be a new war in the future.
I really don’t know about that, but I truly believe that if ZOS removed PvP from ESO, PvE would be 100% better for sure.
DarkStrifeYT wrote: »Should all PvE be eliminated from ESO? Sounds great to me so maybe I should make a poll too.
Tempted to do that, nothing but open world pvp from here on
Its mostly just out of curiosity and a discussion. Especially with how the story is going but who knows could be a new war in the future.
I really don’t know about that, but I truly believe that if ZOS removed PvP from ESO, PvE would be 100% better for sure.
PvE will be removed shortly after PvP is removed is how that will play out.
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »DarkStrifeYT wrote: »Should all PvE be eliminated from ESO? Sounds great to me so maybe I should make a poll too.
Tempted to do that, nothing but open world pvp from here on
Its mostly just out of curiosity and a discussion. Especially with how the story is going but who knows could be a new war in the future.
I really don’t know about that, but I truly believe that if ZOS removed PvP from ESO, PvE would be 100% better for sure.
Except for all of the players who actually enjoy PvP. You would be basically reaching into their Steam library and deleting the game for them.