LukosCreyden wrote: »Epic PTS gamers, we need intel. Did they change the animation??
LukosCreyden wrote: »Epic PTS gamers, we need intel. Did they change the animation??
NoticeMeArkay wrote: »LukosCreyden wrote: »Epic PTS gamers, we need intel. Did they change the animation??
Nope, sadly not.
Elvenheart wrote: »NoticeMeArkay wrote: »LukosCreyden wrote: »Epic PTS gamers, we need intel. Did they change the animation??
Nope, sadly not.
There is no sad emote or emoji sufficient enough to express my sadness over this.
NoticeMeArkay wrote: »Elvenheart wrote: »NoticeMeArkay wrote: »LukosCreyden wrote: »Epic PTS gamers, we need intel. Did they change the animation??
Nope, sadly not.
There is no sad emote or emoji sufficient enough to express my sadness over this.
My honest condolences. I do not play a templar. But the nighthollow staff sure was the worst pick for a new look I could have possibly imagined.
The_Meathead wrote: »It's baffling to me how this post is just the tiniest portion of a massive deluge of near-universal preference for the original appearance of Jabs, but we've never heard so much as a, "Hey, we hear you guys! It may be a while, but we'll address it."
Nope.
Nothing.
I'll just keep shoveling, I suppose.
U35 was truly epic levels of blunder.
TheBardAtTheInn wrote: »After the Aetheric Lancer set came out, which featured yet another instance of the better, older spear model, I made a post in the PTS section about how it's clear that they're sticking with the ugly Nighthollow style out of sheer spite, and my post title got modded for "bashing". The longer it's gone without so much as a mention from the dev team, the more I'm convinced that's the case. They wanted to change the animation, and someone with pull decided to make the new model their own personal favorite staff style. Forget any sort of visual or thematic consistency whatsoever.