The whole ToT-Ranking System is - from my pov - a complete mess. Its intransparent and absolutely not comprehensible in any way !

We don't need any complex equations like from Einstein:




What we need is ZOS to reevaluate and overhaul the whole system, with the goal to make it transparent, easy to comprehend and as simple as possible (eg. if you win, you will get X amount of points and if you loose, you will loose Y amount of points, while X is always a bit higher than Y ... X > Y ...).

I think statistics, rather than ranking, would be much more interesting to players. Wins, losses, average margin of victory/defeat, favorite/least favorite deck, win/loss % against each deck, patron versus score victory average, etc. This sort of info would be a measure for folks' time spent with the game (RPG?!), but might even provide insight for players (and devs!) to improve their methods and game.

If folks really want to be thought of as Tribute's best player; why aren't there tournaments to prove it rather than the current abysmal ranking system?