adriant1978 wrote: »I really want to take issue with the idea that these old anniversary cakes and similar items were earned by players in the past and thus have some kind of intrinsic exclusivity based on effort put in.
People got these by dint of being in the right place at the right time. They were literally given out in exchange for logging into the game within a set time period. You didn't do anything to prove yourself worthy of receiving them, so they are not at all like exclusive rewards for trials and PvP achievements. No, the trivially easy "quest" you do for Chef Donolon doesn't count.
These are are time based rewards, not anything that anyone earned through effort or skill, so you can't get salty on the basis that other players want them "without earning them".
Yes, they were earned, in my opinion. By being there and getting the memento.
Maybe now everyone should get the log-in rewards even if they don't log in?
adriant1978 wrote: »Yes, they were earned, in my opinion. By being there and getting the memento.
Note that neither myself nor the OP asked for the older anniversary cakes to be available for free. They could easily be made available for gold, event tickets as the OP suggested, or even Crowns. If you want to argue that being in the right place at the right time counts as effort to earn something, then IMO so does accumulating enough of whatever currency it costs to get the same rewards later.Maybe now everyone should get the log-in rewards even if they don't log in?
You're the first person to bring login rewards into the discussion, but yes I absolutely think there should be some catch-up method for newer players to obtain unique items which were given out as login rewards in the past. I'm talking about the occasional hairs, accessories, pets, and such here not the generic consumable items; there will always be more of those along next month.
So basically, you think everyone should have everything. And nothing should ever be limited, unique, or special.
adriant1978 wrote: »So basically, you think everyone should have everything. And nothing should ever be limited, unique, or special.
Exactly right. I don't agree with artificial scarcity or exclusivity of digital items. I've never seen anything good come from it, only one group of people who are sad because they see no reason why they shouldn't be able to obtain something which exists in limitless quantities as ones and zeroes, and another group who seem to enjoy reminding them that no they can't have it because they didn't fulfil some arbitrary one time condition.
If an item only feels "special" because you have it and some other people don't, then maybe the item itself isn't that special at all.

spartaxoxo wrote: »I have never really considered participation trophies in general as something earned through a level of work that must be honored always and forever. You basically just get them for existing. So, I think that does influence my view of these cakes.
For me in order for exclusivity to be earned, there has to be a good reason for it to be exclusive or it had to require some real effort.
Edit:
Also just to show that I'm not speaking this way because I want cakes that I didn't "earn." I'm posing in my VSS skin because it's one of my current hardest items in-game that I won. I don't typically wear it because it's not very good, and others have earned much harder items. But, I felt it was a noteworthy distinction for this discussion and my P.O.V.
I consider it a trial skin earned (unless you bought it as a carry). And I consider these cakes to be participation trophies that don't even show participated particularly well.
I feel that I earned my dungeon and trial achievements because I worked hard to get each one by playing the game in hard content.
I don't feel that I earned these cakes because I got them practically for logging in. Chef Donovan didn't even make me look for the ingredients, they are right next to him. I cannot think of an easier reward in this game.
spartaxoxo wrote: »I have never really considered participation trophies in general as something earned through a level of work that must be honored always and forever. You basically just get them for existing. So, I think that does influence my view of these cakes.
For me in order for exclusivity to be earned, there has to be a good reason for it to be exclusive or it had to require some real effort.
Edit:
Also just to show that I'm not speaking this way because I want cakes that I didn't "earn." I'm posing in my VSS skin because it's one of my current hardest items in-game that I won. I don't typically wear it because it's not very good, and others have earned much harder items. But, I felt it was a noteworthy distinction for this discussion and my P.O.V.
I consider it a trial skin earned (unless you bought it as a carry). And I consider these cakes to be participation trophies that don't even show participated particularly well.
I feel that I earned my dungeon and trial achievements because I worked hard to get each one by playing the game in hard content.
I don't feel that I earned these cakes because I got them practically for logging in. Chef Donovan didn't even make me look for the ingredients, they are right next to him. I cannot think of an easier reward in this game.
I guess those that can't complete trials or difficult dungeon achievements are undeserving of having anything unique...
Once again, deciding who is deserving of unique, limited, or special rewards and who isn't.
I don't see what is so wrong with loyalty rewards or rewards for time spent in a game. Just like the Monkey, Tiger, etc.
Why can't there be something unique for all different aspects of the game?
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »I have never really considered participation trophies in general as something earned through a level of work that must be honored always and forever. You basically just get them for existing. So, I think that does influence my view of these cakes.
For me in order for exclusivity to be earned, there has to be a good reason for it to be exclusive or it had to require some real effort.
Edit:
Also just to show that I'm not speaking this way because I want cakes that I didn't "earn." I'm posing in my VSS skin because it's one of my current hardest items in-game that I won. I don't typically wear it because it's not very good, and others have earned much harder items. But, I felt it was a noteworthy distinction for this discussion and my P.O.V.
I consider it a trial skin earned (unless you bought it as a carry). And I consider these cakes to be participation trophies that don't even show participated particularly well.
I feel that I earned my dungeon and trial achievements because I worked hard to get each one by playing the game in hard content.
I don't feel that I earned these cakes because I got them practically for logging in. Chef Donovan didn't even make me look for the ingredients, they are right next to him. I cannot think of an easier reward in this game.
I guess those that can't complete trials or difficult dungeon achievements are undeserving of having anything unique...
Once again, deciding who is deserving of unique, limited, or special rewards and who isn't.
I don't see what is so wrong with loyalty rewards or rewards for time spent in a game. Just like the Monkey, Tiger, etc.
Why can't there be something unique for all different aspects of the game?
I already stated I believe the mementos should remain unique.
It's the replicas in particular I take issue with, not the idea of unique rewards for casual content in general.
The replicas are bad because they were made available AFTER the introduced the memento. This means people who DID participate in anniversary 2016 don't get the replica just because they couldn't predict the future.
They are also meant to commemorate a year of play but they don't because people who played that year may not be able to buy them.
And they are also necessary items for making a good looking bakery. There aren't a lot of cakes in this game that can be used as alternatives.
When it comes to exclusivity I don't believe in all or nothing. Just because I think this particular item shouldn't be exclusive doesn't mean that I think casual content shouldn't have exclusive rewards.
The memento should be enough because it served a purpose during the event, it granted exp. The same is not true of the cakes and the cakes did not always exist.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »I have never really considered participation trophies in general as something earned through a level of work that must be honored always and forever. You basically just get them for existing. So, I think that does influence my view of these cakes.
For me in order for exclusivity to be earned, there has to be a good reason for it to be exclusive or it had to require some real effort.
Edit:
Also just to show that I'm not speaking this way because I want cakes that I didn't "earn." I'm posing in my VSS skin because it's one of my current hardest items in-game that I won. I don't typically wear it because it's not very good, and others have earned much harder items. But, I felt it was a noteworthy distinction for this discussion and my P.O.V.
I consider it a trial skin earned (unless you bought it as a carry). And I consider these cakes to be participation trophies that don't even show participated particularly well.
I feel that I earned my dungeon and trial achievements because I worked hard to get each one by playing the game in hard content.
I don't feel that I earned these cakes because I got them practically for logging in. Chef Donovan didn't even make me look for the ingredients, they are right next to him. I cannot think of an easier reward in this game.
I guess those that can't complete trials or difficult dungeon achievements are undeserving of having anything unique...
Once again, deciding who is deserving of unique, limited, or special rewards and who isn't.
I don't see what is so wrong with loyalty rewards or rewards for time spent in a game. Just like the Monkey, Tiger, etc.
Why can't there be something unique for all different aspects of the game?
I already stated I believe the mementos should remain unique.
It's the replicas in particular I take issue with, not the idea of unique rewards for casual content in general.
The replicas are bad because they were made available AFTER the introduced the memento. This means people who DID participate in anniversary 2016 don't get the replica just because they couldn't predict the future.
They are also meant to commemorate a year of play but they don't because people who played that year may not be able to buy them.
And they are also necessary items for making a good looking bakery. There aren't a lot of cakes in this game that can be used as alternatives.
When it comes to exclusivity I don't believe in all or nothing. Just because I think this particular item shouldn't be exclusive doesn't mean that I think casual content shouldn't have exclusive rewards.
The memento should be enough because it served a purpose during the event, it granted exp. The same is not true of the cakes and the cakes did not always exist.
Well, people are specifically saying that since these required no skill to obtain, they don't deserve to be limited or unique. For that particular reason alone.
So, if it's just cakes in general that are desired, since there aren't many in game, why not request more cakes be added instead of having to have these particular cakes that represent someone being somewhere and doing something at a particular time in game?
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »I have never really considered participation trophies in general as something earned through a level of work that must be honored always and forever. You basically just get them for existing. So, I think that does influence my view of these cakes.
For me in order for exclusivity to be earned, there has to be a good reason for it to be exclusive or it had to require some real effort.
Edit:
Also just to show that I'm not speaking this way because I want cakes that I didn't "earn." I'm posing in my VSS skin because it's one of my current hardest items in-game that I won. I don't typically wear it because it's not very good, and others have earned much harder items. But, I felt it was a noteworthy distinction for this discussion and my P.O.V.
I consider it a trial skin earned (unless you bought it as a carry). And I consider these cakes to be participation trophies that don't even show participated particularly well.
I feel that I earned my dungeon and trial achievements because I worked hard to get each one by playing the game in hard content.
I don't feel that I earned these cakes because I got them practically for logging in. Chef Donovan didn't even make me look for the ingredients, they are right next to him. I cannot think of an easier reward in this game.
I guess those that can't complete trials or difficult dungeon achievements are undeserving of having anything unique...
Once again, deciding who is deserving of unique, limited, or special rewards and who isn't.
I don't see what is so wrong with loyalty rewards or rewards for time spent in a game. Just like the Monkey, Tiger, etc.
Why can't there be something unique for all different aspects of the game?
I already stated I believe the mementos should remain unique.
It's the replicas in particular I take issue with, not the idea of unique rewards for casual content in general.
The replicas are bad because they were made available AFTER the introduced the memento. This means people who DID participate in anniversary 2016 don't get the replica just because they couldn't predict the future.
They are also meant to commemorate a year of play but they don't because people who played that year may not be able to buy them.
And they are also necessary items for making a good looking bakery. There aren't a lot of cakes in this game that can be used as alternatives.
When it comes to exclusivity I don't believe in all or nothing. Just because I think this particular item shouldn't be exclusive doesn't mean that I think casual content shouldn't have exclusive rewards.
The memento should be enough because it served a purpose during the event, it granted exp. The same is not true of the cakes and the cakes did not always exist.
Well, people are specifically saying that since these required no skill to obtain, they don't deserve to be limited or unique. For that particular reason alone.
So, if it's just cakes in general that are desired, since there aren't many in game, why not request more cakes be added instead of having to have these particular cakes that represent someone being somewhere and doing something at a particular time in game?
Because the replicas were introduced in 2020. But the mementos were introduced in 2016.
This means that people who did the anniversary event during 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 but didn't get the cake can't get the replica. When these people declined the memento because they did not need an exp buff, they had no way of predicting it would be a necessary item for furnishing their home in the future. A memento isn't furniture.
This replica does NOT show who participated in those events. It doesn't show who participated in that year. Therefore that's not a good reason for it to be exclusive.
This replica also does NOT demonstrate effort. You get this for existing at the right time. These rewards are obtained, not earned. So effort isn't a good reason for it to be exclusive.
They can't be resold and thus have no coin value. So protecting the market isn't a good reason for it to be exclusive.
It should be exclusive because it's exclusive is circular logic and a fallacy, so I don't consider it to be a good reason to be exclusive.
It should be exclusive because they might give away trial skins is the slippery slope logical fallacy and therefore I don't consider it to be a good reason for it to be exclusive.
There's no good reason for these to be exclusive in my personal opinion, so therefore I don't personally feel they should be.
I would be okay if you had to be playing that year to buy that year's cake. I am not okay with the current system. I think it's wrong to prevent players who were playing in 2016 from being able to buy the cake just because they couldn't predict the future.
To me, the fact you have to have acquired the memento for the cake during that year's festival to have the cake... makes perfect sense and is a totally reasonable requirement.
I personally don't see why some things should be deemed worthy of sticking to the requirements and prerequisites and some things shouldn't.
I also don't see why so many people seem to think they are entitled to certain things, even if they do not fulfil the prerequisites to attain them.