acastanza_ESO wrote: »This is not okay.
Pigeonholing Wardens into Ice Staffs over their vigorous objections.
Ignoring actual PVPers feedback on how poorly thought our Emperor Scaling was
Constant feedback that magicka focused Sorcerers needed serious adjustments that aren't just "moar pets".
Ignoring our feedback about PVP breaking sets that still need to be adjusted (Ward).
You clearly aren't listening to your player base. This kind of disrespect comes from the very top. Shame on you ZOS. Shame.
It is what it is.
You either accept it or move on. It's never going to change.
spartaxoxo wrote: »
spartaxoxo wrote: »
I'm surprised anyone still plays on the PTS, the tone for engagement was set with the feedback on the AwA changes earlier in the year, and compounded by the non-existent Q&A on the combat changes since then.
I'm surprised anyone still plays on the PTS, the tone for engagement was set with the feedback on the AwA changes earlier in the year, and compounded by the non-existent Q&A on the combat changes since then.
I think most people who play on the PTS nowadays either just want to see the new stuff (new zone, new story, new items, etc.) or they want to see how their characters DPS will change.
But there's also probably a minority of players who log onto PTS who believe their feedback will make a difference.
acastanza_ESO wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »
Probably their constant "everything is fine" nonsense.
They changed literally nothing in response to any feedback.
I'm surprised anyone still plays on the PTS, the tone for engagement was set with the feedback on the AwA changes earlier in the year, and compounded by the non-existent Q&A on the combat changes since then.
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »Yeah, reading them I was like, "Wow, this is just a copy/paste of the Week 3 notes."
The purpose of the PTS becomes less and less clear with every successive patch as less and less feedback is being responded to.
It's basically just a place to see how the new costumesw look on your character and to preview furnishing items.
danthemann5 wrote: »acastanza_ESO wrote: »This is not okay.
Pigeonholing Wardens into Ice Staffs over their vigorous objections.
Ignoring actual PVPers feedback on how poorly thought our Emperor Scaling was
Constant feedback that magicka focused Sorcerers needed serious adjustments that aren't just "moar pets".
Ignoring our feedback about PVP breaking sets that still need to be adjusted (Ward).
You clearly aren't listening to your player base. This kind of disrespect comes from the very top. Shame on you ZOS. Shame.
Your forum profile says you joined in 2013. You've been here long enough to know how it goes.
acastanza_ESO wrote: »This is not okay.
Pigeonholing Wardens into Ice Staffs over their vigorous objections.
Ignoring actual PVPers feedback on how poorly thought our Emperor Scaling was
Constant feedback that magicka focused Sorcerers needed serious adjustments that aren't just "moar pets".
Ignoring our feedback about PVP breaking sets that still need to be adjusted (Ward).
You clearly aren't listening to your player base. This kind of disrespect comes from the very top. Shame on you ZOS. Shame.
I'm surprised anyone still plays on the PTS, the tone for engagement was set with the feedback on the AwA changes earlier in the year, and compounded by the non-existent Q&A on the combat changes since then.
Frost for Warden sucks since the frost staff taunts and the damage seems to suck from frost.
MagicAndrej wrote: »As a warden main (2000 hours+) Sticking us into suffering with a 2% damage bonus unless we use a staff which is fairly clunky in my opinion and which attacks are way too boring and stale when compared to lightning or inferno.
But whatever, ZoS love changing everything every 2 weeks so yk im sure at some point we'll get another change which you know might be enjoyable to play with.