@SilverBride @BlueRaven
I still feel that the analogy isn't accurate. And As I said, I don't want to invalidate your feelings, I just don't get the outrage this time around.
I'll quote only parts of your posts for clarity's sake.SilverBride wrote: »I tried to explain this to a friend because they couldn't understand our view. I told them to imagine you rent an apartment in a large building. There are amenities such as a pool and a hot tub and a gym but you have to pay an extra monthly fee to access them. One day the landlord said "You have been good tenants so I would like to reward everyone with free hot tub access". Those who already pay for this don't feel rewarded and feel their amenity package has lost the value of one of its perks, but their monthly fee hasn't decreased to make up the difference. The landlord notices this and says "Also those with the amenity package can now have this nice bath towel as their reward.
Sorry, but in that analogy there never was a hot tub to begin with.
You are a tenant with access to certain things, let's say pool and gym (although ESO+ has more than two perks). Then landlord installs a hot tub and says, everyone who pays this one time fee in a certain time will have the access to the hot tub. You also can forfeit said fee and have said access included in your usual subscription to gym and pool. And if you pay said fee you get complimentary towel (and High Isle Chapter I don't want to bother with thinking up another analogous thing). Also the hot tub is infinite in size, everybody can fit in at a same time and not bother anybody else.
And don't forget that if you bought High Isle you ALSO get this dlc. You can play it even if you unsubscribe. I see it as a win. If I ever am in worse financial state than now, and decide to cut my ESO+ expenses, I'll still be able to play that dlc.SilverBride wrote: »Not everyone cares about mounts. I would be very unhappy if that was next year's reward and feel cheated for a third year in a row.
And here you hit the nail on the head. The truth is, no matter what reward will be presented there will always be someone who's not happy with it.
They give out a house - "I'm not into housing" or "The house is too big/small/wrong style",
They give out a mount - "I'm not into mounts"; "It's too flashy/plain",
They give out a costume - "I don't care about cosmetics"; "I only use motifs",
They give out pets - "I'm not into pets"; "It's ugly",
They give out Crown Crates - "I'm not gonna gamble" - yes, there are people who don't want to open free crates as they are that much against the whole concept,
They give out Crowns - "There's nothing in the store that I want", "You gave out too little".
Although expecting to be given Crowns is just wishful thinking at this point.
I can understand more not being happy with the lack of perks for ESO+ when they give out those free trial weeks, since they are getting exactly what you get for money for free, and especially since back in the day they did give out some Crown Crates, so there's a precedent.
But this time you still get the added bonus of having the lifetime access to that dlc, and the token pet, which you may, or may not like, but as we established there's no one thing that everybody would like.
TL;DR I do understand where you're coming from, I acnowledge your feelings on that, but I can't help finding them childish. I'm happy with my ESO+, I pay for many perks, mostly for the craft bag and dyeing costumes, and someone getting a small piece of that pie isn't going to ruin it for me, even if I didn't get the ugly pet.
Im seeing alot of people not being happy with the next dlc being free content because it doesnt benefit Eso+ was the dlc going to be free anyway with eso+??
spartaxoxo wrote: »As a plus subscriber that was just saved 2000 crowns, there's nothing nonsensical about that being a perk. A perk you have, but don't personally plan on using, is still a perk you have.
spartaxoxo wrote: »As a plus subscriber that was just saved 2000 crowns, there's nothing nonsensical about that being a perk. A perk you have, but don't personally plan on using, is still a perk you have.
They should just stop giving away ESO+ perks as awards. I've never seen any other company do this - gleefully give away stuff that subscribers pay for. They have tons of stuff they could give away. Why do they keep giving away ESO+ perks?
You don't mind because you're in the (I would bet) minority of ESO+ subscribers who buy the DLCs anyway. But next time, it might be something you DO care about. You help them by rationalizing this and it'll empower them to give away more ESO+ perks because ESO+ subscribers don't mind, right? Well, a lot of us DO mind.
I'm happy for non-subscribers. It's a great award. I'm happy for ESO+ subscribers who buy the DLCs anyway. Great for them too. But don't spin this as something good for ESO+ subscribers. It isn't. And those who insist that ZOS giving us something we already pay to access is still a perk - well, I have a bridge to sell you.
With this year’s theme they could have done a boat house, where the actual house is a boat with surrounding water and you can take a dinghy to any city on Tamriel that has a harbour.
With this year’s theme they could have done a boat house, where the actual house is a boat with surrounding water and you can take a dinghy to any city on Tamriel that has a harbour.
Now that is a really great idea. Too bad they didn't do that for sure. Of course, I actually also want Erlibru's Cottage as player housing, in it's own little canyon; and Tor Draioch as player housing on a bluff overlooking the sea - perfect "wizard's tower".
spartaxoxo wrote: »With this year’s theme they could have done a boat house, where the actual house is a boat with surrounding water and you can take a dinghy to any city on Tamriel that has a harbour.
Now that is a really great idea. Too bad they didn't do that for sure. Of course, I actually also want Erlibru's Cottage as player housing, in it's own little canyon; and Tor Draioch as player housing on a bluff overlooking the sea - perfect "wizard's tower".
Erlibru's cottage! That's the name of the house I was thinking of that they should have given out a replica of. That would probably have drawn less complaints than the Salamander. That or a cool mount.
spartaxoxo wrote: »With this year’s theme they could have done a boat house, where the actual house is a boat with surrounding water and you can take a dinghy to any city on Tamriel that has a harbour.
Now that is a really great idea. Too bad they didn't do that for sure. Of course, I actually also want Erlibru's Cottage as player housing, in it's own little canyon; and Tor Draioch as player housing on a bluff overlooking the sea - perfect "wizard's tower".
Erlibru's cottage! That's the name of the house I was thinking of that they should have given out a replica of. That would probably have drawn less complaints than the Salamander. That or a cool mount.
Yep, one of the neatest things I've ever seen in this game, I want it and would pay a lot of real money for it and a Tor Draioch wizard's tower. I guess I'll still keep hoping they'll do them someday.
spartaxoxo wrote: »It not being good for you =/= it not being good for ESO+ subscribers. It's useless for the subscribers who a) would not play without a sub, and only a problem to the subset of those bothered by the dlc being a perk for various reasons.
None of us can speak for all ESO+ subscribers.
DLC access might be a perk of ESO+ but it's also something sold separately. It's not, and has never been exclusive to ESO+. So I don't see an issue with it as part of giveaways or sales.
spartaxoxo wrote: »spartaxoxo wrote: »With this year’s theme they could have done a boat house, where the actual house is a boat with surrounding water and you can take a dinghy to any city on Tamriel that has a harbour.
Now that is a really great idea. Too bad they didn't do that for sure. Of course, I actually also want Erlibru's Cottage as player housing, in it's own little canyon; and Tor Draioch as player housing on a bluff overlooking the sea - perfect "wizard's tower".
Erlibru's cottage! That's the name of the house I was thinking of that they should have given out a replica of. That would probably have drawn less complaints than the Salamander. That or a cool mount.
Yep, one of the neatest things I've ever seen in this game, I want it and would pay a lot of real money for it and a Tor Draioch wizard's tower. I guess I'll still keep hoping they'll do them someday.
I feel like the cottage should have been an event reward and Tor Draioch should have been a crown store home. They sold High Hallow Hall as the crown home. It's okay. I mean I bought it just to have a high Isle house. But, I would have preferred a Tor Draioch style home. High Hallow feels like it should have been the coin house this year. Missed opportunity with housing this year, IMO.
Sub already have tons of benefits, event rewards shouldn’t be affected by it at all and even extra pet is unjustified imo.
spartaxoxo wrote: »It not being good for you =/= it not being good for ESO+ subscribers. It's useless for the subscribers who a) would not play without a sub, and only a problem to the subset of those bothered by the dlc being a perk for various reasons.
None of us can speak for all ESO+ subscribers.
DLC access might be a perk of ESO+ but it's also something sold separately. It's not, and has never been exclusive to ESO+. So I don't see an issue with it as part of giveaways or sales.
I'm honestly gobsmacked that you continue to insist there's nothing wrong with a company giving away subscriber perks to non-subscribers for free.
We're saying that subscriber perks should not be given to non-subscribers. It devalues the subscription. That's true for ALL ESO+ subscribers regardless of whether they buy the DLCs or not.
spartaxoxo wrote: »It not being good for you =/= it not being good for ESO+ subscribers. It's useless for the subscribers who a) would not play without a sub, and only a problem to the subset of those bothered by the dlc being a perk for various reasons.
None of us can speak for all ESO+ subscribers.
DLC access might be a perk of ESO+ but it's also something sold separately. It's not, and has never been exclusive to ESO+. So I don't see an issue with it as part of giveaways or sales.
I'm honestly gobsmacked that you continue to insist there's nothing wrong with a company giving away subscriber perks to non-subscribers for free. I've seen others try to explain to you why this isn't a good thing, but for some reason you can't see it. You seem attached to what personal value you're getting from it, and by remaining focused on that, you're missing the big picture.
Nobody is saying it isn't a good award for those ESO+ subscribers who usually buy the DLCs. We're saying that subscriber perks should not be given to non-subscribers. It devalues the subscription. That's true for ALL ESO+ subscribers regardless of whether they buy the DLCs or not.
(As for the last quoted paragraph that you deleted, by that argument, the DLCs shouldn't be listed as an ESO+ perk at all and the subscription price should definitely be lowered.)
Anyway, you'll come back with more rationalizations, but I won't respond because I'll be bashing my head against a brick wall.
@SilverBride @BlueRavenSilverBride wrote: »I tried to explain this to a friend because they couldn't understand our view. I told them to imagine you rent an apartment in a large building. There are amenities such as a pool and a hot tub and a gym but you have to pay an extra monthly fee to access them. One day the landlord said "You have been good tenants so I would like to reward everyone with free hot tub access". Those who already pay for this don't feel rewarded and feel their amenity package has lost the value of one of its perks, but their monthly fee hasn't decreased to make up the difference. The landlord notices this and says "Also those with the amenity package can now have this nice bath towel as their reward.
Sorry, but in that analogy there never was a hot tub to begin with.
SilverBride wrote: »wolfie1.0. wrote: »rootkitronin wrote: »Carcamongus wrote: »I don't understand people saying ESO+ members aren't getting anything.
Because as an ESO+ member, I already have that content - you're placing value on me wanting access to that content should I stop being an ESO+ member. I don't, in fact, I probably wouldn't play ESO at all without ESO+. I don't care to own the DLC, I don't need to own it, I just care that I can access it when I have ESO+.
Part of the value of ESO+ is having access to DLCs without purchasing them, if the new trend is that they are just going to be given away for free... while my ESO+ price remains the same (or goes up), then if anything, I'm losing value there.
That's where the frustration lies, and why this so-called gifting feels like someone paying me back with my own money. Having ZOS or other players tell me that I should be grateful for this, that just adds insult to injury.
For those that who find value in the free DLC, I'm happy for you, no reason not to be - just don't expect everyone to see value in it the same way you do.
You can't say your getting nothing. You get an exclusive pet. The value of said pet is subject to opinion, but it is something.
Nonsubscribers get a free DLC that is worth a lot more than a free pet. They give pets away with the daily rewards, yet we are supposed to accept one as a yearly reward?
PapaTankers wrote: »What do you suggest the reward should have been?
PapaTankers wrote: »What do you suggest the reward should have been?
Something other than an ESO+ perk.
PapaTankers wrote: »PapaTankers wrote: »What do you suggest the reward should have been?
Something other than an ESO+ perk.
Need specific suggestions.
SilverBride wrote: »PapaTankers wrote: »PapaTankers wrote: »What do you suggest the reward should have been?
Something other than an ESO+ perk.
Need specific suggestions.
No we don't. We are saying that giving away one of our ESO+ perks as the yearly reward is not acceptable for the reasons that many have stated. It does not require a list of other options to validate that this particular option is not acceptable.
wolfie1.0. wrote: »Genuine questions for you.
If you owned ESO+ and didn't own HIgh Isle since launch and honestly decided that a 50% sale wasn't enough to convince you to buy it right now because it's free in a few months. What would create such an incentive for you?
wolfie1.0. wrote: »Also, is this something that you are going to actually cancel eso+ over?
PapaTankers wrote: »You expressed your dissapoitment that they have been shafting you for 2 years in a row now and you did not get a house.
SilverBride wrote: »Not everyone cares about mounts. I would be very unhappy if that was next year's reward and feel cheated for a third year in a row.
And here you hit the nail on the head. The truth is, no matter what reward will be presented there will always be someone who's not happy with it.
They give out a house - "I'm not into housing" or "The house is too big/small/wrong style",
They give out a mount - "I'm not into mounts"; "It's too flashy/plain",
They give out a costume - "I don't care about cosmetics"; "I only use motifs",
They give out pets - "I'm not into pets"; "It's ugly",
They give out Crown Crates - "I'm not gonna gamble" - yes, there are people who don't want to open free crates as they are that much against the whole concept,
They give out Crowns - "There's nothing in the store that I want", "You gave out too little".
Although expecting to be given Crowns is just wishful thinking at this point.
I can understand more not being happy with the lack of perks for ESO+ when they give out those free trial weeks, since they are getting exactly what you get for money for free, and especially since back in the day they did give out some Crown Crates, so there's a precedent.
But this time you still get the added bonus of having the lifetime access to that dlc, and the token pet, which you may, or may not like, but as we established there's no one thing that everybody would like.
TL;DR I do understand where you're coming from, I acnowledge your feelings on that, but I can't help finding them childish. I'm happy with my ESO+, I pay for many perks, mostly for the craft bag and dyeing costumes, and someone getting a small piece of that pie isn't going to ruin it for me, even if I didn't get the ugly pet.