redspecter23 wrote: »You're hypothesizing that the current rate is now 0% based on your own sample size of just 500 fish. If the current rate is actually 0%, this thread will get quite a bit of traction quickly as others come in and confirm. I suspect that you are just having a bad streak of RNG. I've tracked over 10000 fish (and others have done more I'm sure) and see very close to a 1% roe rate over time. Your 1.7% seems high to me and perhaps you've seen some good luck in the past, making this current streak seem even worse by comparison.
redspecter23 wrote: »You're hypothesizing that the current rate is now 0% based on your own sample size of just 500 fish. If the current rate is actually 0%, this thread will get quite a bit of traction quickly as others come in and confirm. I suspect that you are just having a bad streak of RNG. I've tracked over 10000 fish (and others have done more I'm sure) and see very close to a 1% roe rate over time. Your 1.7% seems high to me and perhaps you've seen some good luck in the past, making this current streak seem even worse by comparison.
TheAlphaRaider wrote: »redspecter23 wrote: »You're hypothesizing that the current rate is now 0% based on your own sample size of just 500 fish. If the current rate is actually 0%, this thread will get quite a bit of traction quickly as others come in and confirm. I suspect that you are just having a bad streak of RNG. I've tracked over 10000 fish (and others have done more I'm sure) and see very close to a 1% roe rate over time. Your 1.7% seems high to me and perhaps you've seen some good luck in the past, making this current streak seem even worse by comparison.
He is reporting his data. Not your data. Trying to see if its rng or bad luck.redspecter23 wrote: »You're hypothesizing that the current rate is now 0% based on your own sample size of just 500 fish. If the current rate is actually 0%, this thread will get quite a bit of traction quickly as others come in and confirm. I suspect that you are just having a bad streak of RNG. I've tracked over 10000 fish (and others have done more I'm sure) and see very close to a 1% roe rate over time. Your 1.7% seems high to me and perhaps you've seen some good luck in the past, making this current streak seem even worse by comparison.
This is an eroneous reply to his report. He is now tracking under .01 so what is your point. Hell I feel the pain of this on the market. So, regardless of your mathiness, perfected roe is not making its way into recipes and those recipes are not yielding food the traders. Food Economy in shambles.
Probability of success on a single trial: 0.01
Number of trials: 500
Number of successes (x): 0
Binomial probability: P(X = x): 0.00657048304
Unfortunately you just experienced a 6.5% chance event - keep going and you will get it
I got 10+ over the last week so it's certainly still dropping