WhyMustItBe wrote: »...
Yet Australia's currency exchange rate is only around 33% above the dollar. While Argentina's rate maybe increased more significantly with crown price normalization, there would have to be a statistically significant percentage of the NA servers playing from Argentina to account for this massive jump, which is of course not the case. So the numbers don't add up here.More players in the game means more gold being made. Basic economics, when you print a bunch of money, the value of it goes down, and that leads to inflation. I thought they taught this in 9th grade econ.
That only works for currency that goes back into circulation. We are talking about gold to crown exchange. When that gold is spent, it doesn't go back into the economy to cause inflation, it gets ERASED. You don't get crowns you can resell through the exchange you get gifted items that cannot be resold.
Unfortunately they don't cover such nuanced scenarios in 9th grade econ.
gold isn't erased in a crown to gold transaction... it's still very much in the game. Guild store transactions at least take some out. But trading things in game... nothing is gone. I give you 3 million gold for a crow banker... that person now has the 3 million gold.
I literally can print several hundred thousand gold (that appears out of thin air) each day doing writs, the CP changes increased that. You don't think that causes inflation?
You very clearly have your mind made up and will not listen to any other sort of counter-evidence from any source.
JJOtterBear wrote: »I completely agree with the OP. ZOS should set a standard conversion rate, and implement an in game exchange NPC where people can go exchange their crowns for gold, or even vice versa without having to rely on an honor system populated by scammers and greedy players.
if people want to still trade amongst themselves, they may do that. but there needs to be a stable, reliable and safe way to do this so that a few groups of players do not get to decide how this part of the in game economy works.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »
You quoted me before I edited. I mistyped. It gets shifted not erased. But since you don't get crowns from the exchange and instead only items which cannot be resold, that gold being shifted doesn't in itself contribute to inflation. It is just being shifted around.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »We can talk about addressing the greed of monopoly crown sellers ruining the economy as a secondary priority.
starkerealm wrote: »What monopoly?
WhyMustItBe wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »What monopoly?
By failing to create a secure crown exchange in-game and leaving this current half finished system in place where people have to risk being scammed by an "honor system," ZOS has effectively created a de facto monopoly scenario for the crown exchange sites, because they are the only perceived "safe" option available.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »Further, well known members of the ZOS community management team have publicly endorsed these exchanges, which makes them appear more "official" in people's minds, even though they aren't really ZOS employees running them.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »Scamming outside of exchanges is on the rise...
WhyMustItBe wrote: »...made worse by the ZOS policy that they will only restore gold scammed from crown exchange on the first occurrence. This leaves people who have been scammed in a position where they either keep throwing time and gold at shady trades or just go with the monopoly.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »All these factors create a scenario where the only "safe" option is these crown exchange sites.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »That being the case they can effectively charge whatever they want and people will pay it, since the only alternative is to risk getting scammed again and get no help from ZOS.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »If ZOS would just implement a safe exchange officially through the game this price ratcheting would end virtually overnight. I would put real money on that.
Ken_Koerperich wrote: »And Crowns for gold, you see so many scammers trying to make offers for pennies on the dollar....Just this AM, some dude/dudette wanting 5k crowns for only 150k.....Damn near knocked me out of my chair with that low-ball offer....
starkerealm wrote: »That's not what a monopoly is.
A monopoly is when a single party controls the supply of something into the market.
starkerealm wrote: »<Citation Needed>
Now, I know Gina is in the Tamriel Crown Exchange Discord, however, she has never endorsed it. She is there specifically to monitor activity and relay that to the moderation team as needed.
starkerealm wrote: »Again... <Citation Needed>
You do not have access to the data that would allow you to definitively make this statement.
You don't know how many Crowns were gifted in the last 24h. You don't know how many of those were made under the broken promise of a gold payment.
starkerealm wrote: »It's possible that the intention of Crown Store gifting is to give items to your friends. Not, sell crowns.
starkerealm wrote: »You'd lose real money.
The lack of Crown sales has greatly affected prices, ZOS used to have 3 to 4 Crown sales every year, now it's 1 or maybe 2 a year and the discount is smaller than it used to be.
So you have inflation decreasing the value of gold combined with lack of Crown sales resulting in fewer Crowns being purchased. So it makes sense that Crown prices are going up.
Disturbed_One wrote: »Was talking with a friend of mine in game and the topic of crowns came up... I was talking about this thread, and she said she used to broker at TCE back a few years ago. I asked about some of the comments/accusations/etc. in here (they aren't on the forums)...
It isn't that these "official" exchange sites don't provide a service to the community. The problem is ZOS not having a safe and secure way to exchange crowns in-game, leaving it up to the honor system, and thus manufacturing a need for such sites, which would not exist if this system was better implemented.
The scenario of "pay whatever the crown exchanges charge or get scammed" is 100% a result of ZOS not doing this.
However, if these exchanges were really in it to help the community, they would set a hard cap for exchange rates and simply create a first-come-first-serve queue for people wanting to buy crowns, if the supply of crowns was really so low at that rate. Their willingness to leap from 400:1 to over 700:1 does not seem like they are trying to do any favors for the community, regardless of anyone's attempted rationalization.
If they were, and played hard ball with the crown hoarders, the would eventually come down to earth and sell at a reasonable rate, when they realized the alternative was to not sell them at all. If anything it gives the appearance of the exchanges capitulating to the crown-holding price manipulators, if not being the outright manipulators themselves.
I have heard a lot of attempts to explain this away as being just "supply and demand" and other things, but none of these explanations can account for such a radical leap in such a short period of time.
If these go-to sites were to hold their ground and set a hard cap at a rational level new players could actually ever hope to participate in, then these holdouts would not be hoarding crowns waiting for a higher price to sell them at.
If you really want to split hairs that the exchanges aren't price fixing for their own benefit, then I guess you could say they are being manipulated by people holding the crown supply, who are refusing to sell crowns unless the "official" exchange everyone goes to dramatically increases pricing.
Either way it is greed driving this exponential short term leap, not the price of cabbage in Tijuana or anything else.
And regardless of who is ultimately responsible, it would ALL be solved if ZOS would just finish the system they started.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »*snip*
I think you are missing the most important point. No one is saying that new players can't make gold like old players did. What I am saying, if you really think about it a minute, is that if the cost of things you want to BUY with gold has gone up 300%, but the TIME it takes to make that gold is the same, then the new player obviously has it 300% WORSE than the old player when they do those same things.
I don't know how much more clear I can be.
Also, leaving a real money transaction up to the "honor system" in an interface you facilitate while only providing services to redress grievances of people scammed by said system ONCE is a recipe for disaster.
There NEEDS to be a secure mediated exchange controlled through the game interface to prevent scamming FIRST.
We can talk about addressing the greed of monopoly crown sellers ruining the economy as a secondary priority.
Disturbed_One wrote: »[snip] You're advocating for a group of people to strong arm individuals into only accepting a lower price for their crowns? That's really your stance?
"I know you paid real money for these crowns, but you can only get 300:1 on the exchange... never mind that gold is worth a lot less, the $150 you just spent on crowns wont even be able to gold out your gear..."
I'm sorry, I cant fathom DEMANDING that people take less for the thing they paid REAL MONEY for as being a reasonable suggestion. Irreconcilable difference there. [snip]
WhyMustItBe wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »That's not what a monopoly is.
A monopoly is when a single party controls the supply of something into the market.
I think it is more complex than that. I think you have to consider HOW they maintain control. The factors I describe create a PERCEPTUAL monopoly. When people perceive their only options are "get scammed" or "pay the ridiculous price," they will pay the price.
I honestly think this is just semantics.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »<Citation Needed>
Now, I know Gina is in the Tamriel Crown Exchange Discord, however, she has never endorsed it. She is there specifically to monitor activity and relay that to the moderation team as needed.
I would argue that official company presence on a non-affiliated site equates to defacto endorsement.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »It certainly creates the PERCEPTION of endorsement, which is ultimately more important to market trends.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »Again... <Citation Needed>
You do not have access to the data that would allow you to definitively make this statement.
You don't know how many Crowns were gifted in the last 24h. You don't know how many of those were made under the broken promise of a gold payment.
No, you are right. I don't know how many people are being scammed. All I have is subjective on this point. For example, I have purchased crown crates with gold more than a dozen times over the years without ever being scammed. Usually about two 15 crate packs per quarter. This last quarter, I have been scammed more times than not.
Also I don't know if this is a new policy, but I was informed by ZOS that they would refund my scammed gold ONCE. They explicitly stated their policy was that after the first refund, they would no longer provide any support for people getting scammed by crown exchangers. Which to my thinking creates an incentive for people to buy throw-away accounts for $9 bucks and scam as many people as possible before they finally get banned (which doesn't happen overnight BTW).
WhyMustItBe wrote: »I also have anecdotal data from guild members and friends noting a similar trend. But I agree while this is highly suspicious, only ZOS knows for absolute certain whether it is mere coincidence it happens to correlate with 200-300% increase in "official" crown exchange prices.starkerealm wrote: »It's possible that the intention of Crown Store gifting is to give items to your friends. Not, sell crowns.
It doesn't matter if their intention was to look cool on Instagram. The fact they are facilitating a half-baked system of real money exchange with people getting scammed, and providing only first-incident support is a HUGE problem.
They need to follow through and create a safe and secure in-game option to facilitate these trades, or remove them. Period.
WhyMustItBe wrote: »starkerealm wrote: »You'd lose real money.
Totally disagree. Players doing the exchange would still set the price. All the game would do is ensure both parties had committed their half of the trade before facilitating the exchange so that logout scamming was impossible.
It would eliminate the "convenience fee" and render crown exchanges obsolete, and the consumer would only benefit, because instead of a scenario of "pay whatever ridiculous price or get scammed," people could trade with anyone at any price and know they would NEVER get scammed.
It would let people shop around. There would be COMPETITION. This can only be a positive thing for the customer.
adriant1978 wrote: »I can understand why ZOS doesn't want to get involved in manipulating exchange rates though. Does anyone here play Star Trek Online?
WhyMustItBe wrote: »gold isn't erased in a crown to gold transaction... it's still very much in the game. Guild store transactions at least take some out. But trading things in game... nothing is gone. I give you 3 million gold for a crow banker... that person now has the 3 million gold.
You quoted me before I edited. I mistyped. It gets shifted not erased. But since you don't get crowns from the exchange and instead only items which cannot be resold, that gold being shifted doesn't in itself contribute to inflation. It is just being shifted around.I literally can print several hundred thousand gold (that appears out of thin air) each day doing writs, the CP changes increased that. You don't think that causes inflation?
Not during the time frame of two months that the exchange rate has been jacked up, no. I do crafting on 18 characters daily as well. I've been doing it for years. It isn't like suddenly a whole mass of people started doing crafting writs in the last two months. So this can't explain the multiplication of the exchange rate over that period.
And even if there were a massive influx of new players in this time as you previously suggested (which all evidence points to the opposite), they will not have had time to level up 18 characters to do crafting writs on, or be farming cp160 gear in that time, enough to statistically offset total game gold by a proportional amount able to explain the multiplying exchange rate either.
In the absence of these hypothetical scenarios actually adding up to the difference, the only logical conclusion is price gouging by monopoly exchange sites.