hungryhippos wrote: »I was under the assumption that The Elder Scrolls online would be similar to a normal elder scrolls single player game but with multi player fuctionality.
hungryhippos wrote: »And why can't I store items in chests everywhere? Maybe instead of a "bank" the bank building would be your personal house where you could store everything you wanted into chests.
...helping others with quests is a joke because you can't."
hungryhippos wrote: »I was under the assumption that The Elder Scrolls online would be similar to a normal elder scrolls single player game but with multi player fuctionality.
Im actually kind of glad that OP and many more are so angry and pissed and whatever not that they cancel sub and quit this game. You know why? Because it will iron out a decent, mature and fun playerbase and eliminate the whining noodles so it really is a win situation for the rest of us who do like this game. Im fairly confident that this game has enough fans, or adult gamers to keep it sub based game instead of one of many F2P games. For the rest of you there is many other MMO's that are free to play, GW2 is probably one of the best f2p but thats all it is, it cant reach sub based game quality.
Anyways have fun whatever you choose to play but for the love of The Three, stop whining.
hungryhippos wrote: »Oh yeah, angry joe burned this game to the ground. Elder Scrolls will be free to play in a couple months because this bugged piece of whatever is not worth 15 dollars a month. The Bots & Bugs: Online. I regret my 80 dollar purchase (60 for a bugged game and 20 for a horse) I'm not even finishing my free 30 days even though it's a sunk cost.
Im actually kind of glad that OP and many more are so angry and pissed and whatever not that they cancel sub and quit this game. You know why? Because it will iron out a decent, mature and fun playerbase and eliminate the whining noodles so it really is a win situation for the rest of us who do like this game. Im fairly confident that this game has enough fans, or adult gamers to keep it sub based game instead of one of many F2P games. For the rest of you there is many other MMO's that are free to play, GW2 is probably one of the best f2p but thats all it is, it cant reach sub based game quality.
Anyways have fun whatever you choose to play but for the love of The Three, stop whining.
hungryhippos wrote: »I was under the assumption that The Elder Scrolls online would be similar to a normal elder scrolls single player game but with multi player fuctionality.
hungryhippos wrote: »I was under the assumption that The Elder Scrolls online would be similar to a normal elder scrolls single player game but with multi player fuctionality.
- If you took away the multi player, this would be the worst elder scrolls game to date, it feels like a half assed version of skyrim/oblivion with less things to do and worse graphics. And why can't I store items in chests everywhere? Maybe instead of a "bank" the bank building would be your personal house where you could store everything you wanted into chests.
- If you took away the elder scrolls theme, this would be a mediocre mmo as the grouping/party fuctions are absolutely atrocious, helping others with quests is a joke because you can't. World bosses/Elites don't scale with the number of people so you only want help from a few people not alot of people. This seems counter intuitive to a supposedly "Massively Multiplayer Online" type of game. Perhaps we should rename it to "Small Multiplayer Online"
Oh yeah, angry joe burned this game to the ground. Elder Scrolls will be free to play in a couple months because this bugged piece of whatever is not worth 15 dollars a month. The Bots & Bugs: Online. I regret my 80 dollar purchase (60 for a bugged game and 20 for a horse) I'm not even finishing my free 30 days even though it's a sunk cost.