zelaminator wrote: »Most people have a very skewered idea of what P2W is.. So the term gets used way too often
Goregrinder wrote: »LordGodzilla wrote: »You can still finish any content in this game with base game crafted gear.
What exactly are you paying to win at?
i'd like to see a vCR+3 Roster who accept you on stamDK dps with only Hunding + sprigganGoregrinder wrote: »People just want everything for free, or for 5 bucks and think ZOS's bills will just "take care of themselves". That's really all it is. It's like when streaming services raises their monthly subscription a dollar every few years, as if hosting data and purchasing streaming licenses from movie/tv studios was free.
Not reallly. But i play FFXIV too. [snip]
When i play FFXIV, i pay 10€ sub every month, and 1 60€ extension by 2 years~.
Teso ? 13€ a month and 50€ every years.
So, yes it's the same you will tell me. But...
Look now what we got on TES content and FF content.
TES is 4 DJ and 1 raid + 2 area by years.
FFXIV got 12 trials for 8 ppl, 3 for 24, some for relic weapons and maybe 20 area+.
And wth on crownstore ?
What i got from game mount in eso ? 4 horse, 1 wolve dwemer and indriks... and 2 mount with trifectas trials.
all is in crown store like 90%
What i got from game in FFXIV ? So much without paying.
in FF, i can got more than 100 mount, got more than 100 pet, can got music box with all music ig for "free'
We have the same for other gamesthat share some features in FF. Like Monster hunter mount or FFXV mount for free again. Just pay the sub.
In eso ? For get a ebon sword from TES4 i need to fu**ing pay ? WTH. It's the same licences.
It's only that i hate in ESO. Why we don't have mount for area like guard in vvardenfell ? senche on elsweyr ? etc etc.
So yes, it's useless for some guy who just playing orc with purple skin and patnie nordic who just push leaderboard as a goal.
NP with that. But some like diversity IG with cosmetic.
You can tell me, just don't use the crown with your sub.
Yes, but i need it for 21dummy, the new regen ult stone, house 700+...
I just hate all poeple thinking it's normal, to buy something like Greymoor, and need to repay 100€+ for get the house 700 slot in this area. etc etc.
ESO is :
Look we just release something new and in your game + extension ! (house, assistant, companion,antiquities etc etc).
After that, next DLC give you only 1 on this thing, and after, they just put it on crownstore. And that's the thing i hate.
And don't tell me it's normal. Most of ppl here pay sub + year chapter...
And i don't tell about ppl who pay carry with 15k crowncrate, or buy some crown for sell and make gold for buy some golds mats or sets (or carry again)...
Lot of ppl saying eso is not so expensive for a MMO it's ppl who don't play a MMO RPG.
But ppl who play only on trials or who play only solo for quest 1 h per evening.
But after that, it's just my opinion, it's sure a lot don't have the same. But it's really hard when i compare other MMO...
SWTOR got more cosmetic IG than ESO and it's f2p
Joke but hope, new system for mid-june will be cool for that...
(sorry if my english is bad, tried to do my best)
[Quoted post was removed]
zelaminator wrote: »Most people have a very skewered idea of what P2W is.. So the term gets used way too often
Maybe if Bethesda didn't keep changing the meaning of words, the term would not be skewered then.
Vonkarolinas wrote: »Coming back to the game after a year hiatus (looking at you month long jubilee at the start of covid) and playing for roughly a month now... I keep on seeing people use the term 'paywall' and 'p2w' to voice disdain against Zenimax for the release of new gear with the expansion.
'oh great, new content, why am I being paywalled for (insert gear/mythic here)'
'freaking eso is p2w now cause kilt/pale order/whatever'
'I'm done with this game, its all p2w now'
What gives? Is this not an MMO that has a consistent cycle of one paid expansion and 2-3 dlc (that is usually included with eso+ and able to be bought w/ crowns)? Haven't this been the case since Elsweyr? Since Summerset? Since Morrowind? Roughly once a year we get a paid expansion, that paid expansion includes previous expansions in the purchase, then get optional dlc that we can either buy/crown/eso+ for.
How is this p2w? If going by meta of the past and present, gear and skill load outs change by the expansion and dlc sure but this does not make prior loadouts unviable. Having this new gear will not make you top the charts. Make your numbers rise a little before getting nerfed in patches? Maybe.
How are we as a community getting paywalled and forced to p2w to remain relevant in our content and ability to play the game? I don't understand this trend.
They are just cryhards and following another trend where it is "the thing" to complain about something rather than admit they enjoy it.
You notice, despite all the boo-hooing and gnashing of teeth, they are still playing.
As long as warden and necro are the strongest classes in PVP its Pay2win.
Is there any valid reason they haven't been balanced with the other classes?
LordGodzilla wrote: »Oh yes, we don't know how to setup auto attack, but okay ! It's feature, we search for thatx)
As long as warden and necro are the strongest classes in PVP its Pay2win.
Is there any valid reason they haven't been balanced with the other classes?
ectoplasmicninja wrote: »That said, being able to buy skyshards and skill lines in the crown store makes my skin crawl a little. The cycle of "meta sets will be nerfed and then a new meta mythic will drop and then be nerfed" is pretty well established now too and also displeases me. But new classes? Cool new sets? New skill lines? Obviously we have to pay for new things. What's the alternative, that they make sure their new stuff sucks so nobody wants to buy it?
I wouldn't consider it pay to win. What exactly do you "win" if you buy Blackwood that you didn't win if you didn't buy Blackwood? Your're paying for the content in Blackwood. You get a new area with new quests, dungeons, and of course companions. I guess one could make an incredibly weak argument that now you "lose" if you don't have a companion by your side but what exactly did you "lose". Even PvP wise i've never noticed expansions significantly changing the way a toon performs. I've always considered pay to win to be a cash shop that requires a person to buy the best gear else they get rolled in PvP.
amm7sb14_ESO wrote: »I wouldn't consider it pay to win. What exactly do you "win" if you buy Blackwood that you didn't win if you didn't buy Blackwood? Your're paying for the content in Blackwood. You get a new area with new quests, dungeons, and of course companions. I guess one could make an incredibly weak argument that now you "lose" if you don't have a companion by your side but what exactly did you "lose". Even PvP wise i've never noticed expansions significantly changing the way a toon performs. I've always considered pay to win to be a cash shop that requires a person to buy the best gear else they get rolled in PvP.
The argument would be sets that are available in the trials and dungeons that you wouldn't be able to get otherwise without the DLC. In the case of Morrowind and Elsweyr, people also claim that Wardens and Necromancers are P2W
I think these are incredibly weak and flimsy arguments, as you can "win" without these classes or sets, and the addition of content is not the same as "pay to win".
I don't agree with the arguments, but those are the arguments that some will make as to why DLC / expansions are "P2W"