One can win more people to their side with gentle persuasion than being hostile and that type of comment, calling them blatantly irresponsible, is hostile. This is both common sense and logical.
BTW, when trying to get a CS agent to help with something the worst thing one can say is they will never do business with them again. The CS agent's job is actually customer retention and that little message just told them to not go to great lengths to help because the customer already made up their mind. Just FYI.
This isn’t just a Zeni thing. Going straight to a chargeback or payment cancellation is a “scorched earth” solution with many, many business and you will no longer be welcomed as a customer.
Debatable.Taleof2Cities wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »I hope you're not using "blatantly irresponsible" in your dialogue with the ZOS Support Team. That will just end up adding more time until you can get back into the game.
If so, that would be extremely unprofessional on ZOS Support part. They should have the wisdom and insight enough to realize that when a customer is not in the wrong and the customer is being punished as if they are in the wrong, that the customer may be less than enthusiastic about the situation. Hence, why the customer is irate. Customer service 101.
Except in this example the customer was in fact wrong.
One can win more people to their side with gentle persuasion than being hostile and that type of comment, calling them blatantly irresponsible, is hostile. This is both common sense and logical.
This is irrelevant when you are talking about business and the goal is to make money. Treat a customer bad and you lose business/lose money, treat them good and you stand to keep their business regardless of how the customer acts. I mean this is business 101and one of the first things you learn in any business class.
Actually there is quite amount to debate on what this is in reference to. The customer did not receive the goods from ZOS they purchased in good faith. ZOS was wrong in this manner.Not much to debate. Zos took control and shut things down because a debit card chargeback is considered hostile since the vendor has no say in the matter. As such Zos takes the action of closing the account to force the customer to come to them and explain.
And treating a customer incorrectly by lengthening the time it takes to resolve their issue, especially when the business is the one who failed to deliver on the goods has absolutely ZERO to do with the customer and how they act.Quite the contrary. Businesses want to grow their business but they also do not want to have to deal with jerks constantly so they often are less willing to bend over backward for rude people.
BTW, this came from a person who started off in CS for an auto manufacturer. They are currently an executive vice president for the auto manufacturer.
umm...ignorance is no excuse for handling a situation like this.I don't expect someone who has their first credit card or debit card to even know what a charge back is.This isn’t just a Zeni thing. Going straight to a chargeback or payment cancellation is a “scorched earth” solution with many, many business and you will no longer be welcomed as a customer.
Lots of people ITT jumping on OP using their very acute hindsight and stuff they googled and then acted like they'd always known it and everyone knows it and OP is a failure for not knowing it. Not intelligent, useful or productive.
Protip to temporarily embarrassed millionaires who are always ready to pounce and condescend and lecture the least powerful person in a situation: you're all crabs in the same bucket as the rest of us.
Lots of people ITT jumping on OP using their very acute hindsight and stuff they googled and then acted like they'd always known it and everyone knows it and OP is a failure for not knowing it. Not intelligent, useful or productive.
Protip to temporarily embarrassed millionaires who are always ready to pounce and condescend and lecture the least powerful person in a situation: you're all crabs in the same bucket as the rest of us.