Urzigurumash wrote: »I'm not calling for nerfs to these sets or saying they're overpowered in the greater context, but I don't know the answer to this question.
Urzigurumash wrote: »I'm not calling for nerfs to these sets or saying they're overpowered in the greater context, but I don't know the answer to this question.
Doesn't Caluurion's require a crit?
Urzigurumash wrote: »Urzigurumash wrote: »I'm not calling for nerfs to these sets or saying they're overpowered in the greater context, but I don't know the answer to this question.
Doesn't Caluurion's require a crit?
Yeah, hence the question. They both do. I see many players running these sets now, Caluurion's is much more popular now than it ever was, so they obviously perform well without Malacath. They are the only proc sets we can be sure are being ran for their competitive edge over stats sets without a buff from Malacath.
I know Hunter's Venom is new and Caluurion's was recently improved, so maybe these sets always would've been this popular with or without a proc meta, but I'm not sure, since I don't really play the sorts of builds that use these sets.
Urzigurumash wrote: »Or, are they strictly popular because they interact well with Sorc and NB? Why are they both more popular on these classes than stats sets? I have some ideas as to maybe why, but with little experience on ranged builds, Sorc, or NB, I'm not sure.
This is just a contemplation on the idea that it is strictly Malacath's interaction with procs which drives the meta in PvP. I'm not saying that's not the case, but I haven't had the popularity of these sets explained to me by those knowledgeable about the sorts of builds to which these sets adapt well.
Caal is in a good spot though.
They weren’t meta before malacath why would they be if it was removed?
Urzigurumash wrote: »They weren’t meta before malacath why would they be if it was removed?
Why is Caluurion's so much more popular now in the Malacath era? Just because of its recent revisions? This is the third most frequent proc in my recaps in BGs, after Vat 2h and Vat Destro, but it used to only be seen occasionally. Again I'm not saying it's OP compared to other proc sets, just that it's almost as popular as any proc set, and it doesn't work with Malacath. So what gives? Is it just because Sorc and NB are popular and are reluctant to ditch their crit-related class tools in favor of the putatively stronger Malacath setups? If Malacath were no longer able to buff procs, does everybody park their tank and pick up their Sorc or NB so they can most effectively use Caluurion's or Hunter's Venom?
Of course I understand besides their crit passives, NB has a weaker HP scaled heal than Warden, DK, Sorc, and Necro, if enough corpses are around.
Urzigurumash wrote: »
Who knows? What does it really matter?
Either way, procs won't be needed just to compete. They'll be useful for more specialized builds but not a must have. A lot of players do not like playing with then but do to stay competitive.
This isn't even a thing that is happening so speculating on what the meta will be in a hypothetical future is pretty meaningless. All I can speak to is why they are used when Malacath doesn't work woth them.
Urzigurumash wrote: »Who knows? What does it really matter?
Either way, procs won't be needed just to compete. They'll be useful for more specialized builds but not a must have. A lot of players do not like playing with then but do to stay competitive.
This isn't even a thing that is happening so speculating on what the meta will be in a hypothetical future is pretty meaningless. All I can speak to is why they are used when Malacath doesn't work woth them.
Many have complaints about the ability of Malacath to buff procs, generally predicated on the idea that since procs can't crit, Malacath shouldn't buff them. Why have any discussions about balance if there isn't an eye towards what would happen after the balance adjustment is made?
So look at pvp builds from a year ago and there is your answer. Some people will run procs. Some won't. No one would be viable in full proc full defense. We know exactly how players would build without Malacath working with procs since we were already playing the game like that before Malacath existed.
Urzigurumash wrote: »Or, are they strictly popular because they interact well with Sorc and NB? Why are they both more popular on these classes than stats sets? I have some ideas as to maybe why, but with little experience on ranged builds, Sorc, or NB, I'm not sure.
This is just a contemplation on the idea that it is strictly Malacath's interaction with procs which drives the meta in PvP. I'm not saying that's not the case, but I haven't had the popularity of these sets explained to me by those knowledgeable about the sorts of builds to which these sets adapt well.
Urzigurumash wrote: »Yeah let me try to rephrase.
Since Hunter's Venom and Caluurion's cannot be buffed by Malacath, but are almost as popular as any proc set which is buffed by Malacath, if Malacath no longer buffed those other proc sets, would everybody be in Caluurion's or Hunter's Venom?