Maintenance for the week of September 15:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 15, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 16, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 16, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 15, 4:00AM EDT (8:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EDT (13:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 16, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for patch maintenance – September 16, 6:00AM EDT (10:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
Can you remove the diaper pls?
-
virtus753✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Nirntrotter wrote: »This game is already rated 18+, the revealing looks can not ever be an argument (as the examples above already illustrate). Just fix the damned thing already, farming it was horrible enough. :x
The game is rated M by the ESRB in the US. That’s 17+, so minors are an intended audience.
ESRB ratings are also not legally binding, and the TOS specifically allow for legal minors as young as 16 to have accounts in their own names with the permission of a parent or guardian.0 -
Athan1✭✭✭✭✭
✭It's ironic if you think about it, our character's posterior is more important than anterior because we see their back side all the time.Athan Atticus Imperial Templar of Shezarr5 -
LadyLethalla✭✭✭✭✭
✭DreadDaedroth wrote: »
Yeah, they change stuff all the time.
They modified the Singing Skald costume after less forum backlash than Timbercrow receives, even after people had paid for it with crowns. And with this being a no cash out of pocket item, you'd think they'd be more willing to actually listen to the community and make improvements.
Maybe they won't fix it because it's not a Crown purchase.
I'm wondering if they're going to fix the issue with characters getting stuck in the Psijic Villa now that it's for sale for Crowns.
x-TallyCat-x // PC EU DC - For the Covenant! // ESO Platinum trophy - 16th May 2017.
Melbourne Australia - the land of Potato Internet.WTB ESO OCEANIC SERVER0 -
Path✭✭✭✭✭A long time ago, there was an outfit called a "Metal Bikini."
There was no diaper or underwear showing.
And we all know, There is no underwear in space.
So why in ESO?Fairy Tales Really Do Come True...Kinda.1 -
GreenHere✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭This reminds me of that damn undyeable gold trim on the Nocturnal Shrike outfit. Still a little pissed about that, 2+ years later.
I can't help but feel like they do this sort of thing on purpose... It really seems like the artist nails an aesthetic, then someone along the way makes that one obviously terrible decision that just-shy-of-ruins the whole thing. Happens kind of a lot.
"Jenkins! Make something nice, but not too nice... Gotta keep those Crown Store suckers looking for the "perfect" outfit that will never come! mwahahahaha"
~ Some jerk at ZOS, in my imaginary scenario that might actually be true4 -
bellanca6561n✭✭✭✭✭
✭I too tried to keep the earlier thread going until I went a bit too far with whole diaper thing
They are not listening. Most every game studio outsources much of their art. They do not care.0 -
bellanca6561n✭✭✭✭✭
✭Dark_Lord_Kuro wrote: »Almalexia's costume is far more "revealing." ZOS has already demonstrated their tolerance for gluteal display [snip]
Indeed....
5 -
Nighn_9✭✭✭✭✭idc about looking the most naked... i want the option to hide shoulder pieces. With that said the option to hide all pieces too... just like the helm3 -
Jaraal✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭LadyLethalla wrote: »DreadDaedroth wrote: »
Yeah, they change stuff all the time.
They modified the Singing Skald costume after less forum backlash than Timbercrow receives, even after people had paid for it with crowns. And with this being a no cash out of pocket item, you'd think they'd be more willing to actually listen to the community and make improvements.
Maybe they won't fix it because it's not a Crown purchase.
It's usually the opposite. If someone liked their bald headed Skald costume, and ZOS modified it after the fact, then the customer complains based on the fact that they paid cash for something and 'now it's ruined, give me my money back,' etc. If it's an in game only reward, like Timbercrow, then they may be more willing to change things about it, because it essentially didn't cost you anything (tangible) to acquire it.
0 -
Araneae6537✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Truly, I’m baffled that anyone buys this thing. Whether you like the rest of the style or not, that texture glitch just looks sooo bad!
4 -
erio✭✭✭✭✭Nirntrotter wrote: »This game is already rated 18+, the revealing looks can not ever be an argument (as the examples above already illustrate). Just fix the damned thing already, farming it was horrible enough. :x
The game is rated M by the ESRB in the US. That’s 17+, so minors are an intended audience.
ESRB ratings are also not legally binding, and the TOS specifically allow for legal minors as young as 16 to have accounts in their own names with the permission of a parent or guardian.
Cyberpunk, a game with... explicit scenes... is also rated M.1 -
Lady_Sleepless✭✭✭✭✭Couldn't the back flap of the skirt just be larger to cover the whole backside. As it is, it looks incomplete. I'm sure that would be a simple fix and much better than what we have right now.2 -
Lugaldu✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Lady_Sleepless wrote: »Couldn't the back flap of the skirt just be larger to cover the whole backside. As it is, it looks incomplete. I'm sure that would be a simple fix and much better than what we have right now.
Then there is still a problem with jumping - we see things that we shouldn't or don't want to see.2 -
GreenHere✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Lady_Sleepless wrote: »Couldn't the back flap of the skirt just be larger to cover the whole backside. As it is, it looks incomplete. I'm sure that would be a simple fix and much better than what we have right now.
Then there is still a problem with jumping - we see things that we shouldn't or don't want to see.
HEY!! My eyes are up here, pal!
Maybe stop looking up skirts when ladies are having to negotiate obstacles, you perv!
(just kidding, I know this outfit is janky in all kinds of ways and agree it needs addressing. just havin a laugh!
) 0 -
GreenHere✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭
I honestly don't know if that's true, or if you're trolling me back... but either way it's pretty funny! lolEdited by ZOS_ConnorG on February 16, 2021 6:53PM0 -
Jaraal✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭
I honestly don't know if that's true, or if you're trolling me back... but either way it's pretty funny! lol
It's something one can determine for themselves. I wouldn't imagine a screenshot would stay up for very long, so it's up to the individual to verify.Edited by ZOS_ConnorG on February 16, 2021 6:53PM0 -
virtus753✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Nirntrotter wrote: »This game is already rated 18+, the revealing looks can not ever be an argument (as the examples above already illustrate). Just fix the damned thing already, farming it was horrible enough. :x
The game is rated M by the ESRB in the US. That’s 17+, so minors are an intended audience.
ESRB ratings are also not legally binding, and the TOS specifically allow for legal minors as young as 16 to have accounts in their own names with the permission of a parent or guardian.
Cyberpunk, a game with... explicit scenes... is also rated M.
I haven’t played that myself. But I do know the PC version of Oblivion initially allowed the player to use a mod to reveal base game unclothed skin textures, which (in addition to previously unreviewed elements of gore) led to the ESRB rerating it M post-release (but not AO - Adult Only, 18+) in place of the initial T (13+). I remember being carded when I bought that game because the retailer decided to enforce the 17+ rating, but they weren’t legally obligated to do so.
I’m not arguing that the Timbercrow costume would necessarily be too explicit for a 17+ rating with the underwear removed. I think the picture of Almalexia shows that visuals like that can exist in game. I do wonder, though, if the flaps of the costume having physics when the player jumps constitutes a substantive point of difference with the Almalexia model. I don’t recall her jumping up and down leaving her flaps hanging in the wind, at least... Well, narrower underwear could fix that anyhow.
At any rate, my point was that the game is not rated 18+ in at least one of its biggest markets.0 -
magnusthorek✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yeah... It's about time ESO actually goes rated 16 years (R15? MA-15? I don't really know the proper rating) at least a bit more. Not saying nudity (though this would be fun in capital cities
) but... y'know what I mean, as it is ESO is for like... 12, maybe 14? I am the very model of a scientist Salarian, I've studied species Turian, Asari, and Batarian.
I'm quite good at genetics (as a subset of biology) because I am an expert (which I know is a tautology).
My xenoscience studies range from urban to agrarian, I am the very model of a Scientist Salarian.0 -
Tyreal1974✭✭✭✭[Quoted post was removed]
Barbie/Ken...put that thing away!
Now I need to find an ice pick to gouge that from my memory!
Edited by ZOS_ConnorG on February 16, 2021 2:36PM1 -
AcadianPaladin✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Call me naive but I'm optimistic that ZoS will give this otherwise wonderful costume just the bit of love it needs to be great. PC NA(no Steam), PvE, mostly solo1 -
Scardan✭✭✭✭✭Showing booty in 18+ game may hurt children. Diaper should stay.Let's be extremely precise in our use of terms.2 -
Kikazaru✭✭✭✭✭
✭A moment of silence for those who spent over 2m+ for this outfit not realizing about the granny diapers.Mizaru
“Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”8 -
Jaraal✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭A moment of silence for those who spent over 2m+ for this outfit not realizing about the granny diapers.
But a true Foresworn..... I mean..... Timbercrow warrior has no time for potty breaks in the heat of battle! Just let loose, and worry about cleanup after you return victorious!3 -
Slyclone✭✭✭✭I spent 2 million gold. It's a nice outfit. Needs a bit of "labor of love" still.
Perhaps the artist's supervisor should speak up on why it's like that so we don't have to jump to conclusions anymore.
Because I really don't think he/she deserves this flak any longer.
Edit:typoEdited by Slyclone on February 15, 2021 11:55PMThat's it, that's all.0 -
Araneae6537✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I spent 2 million gold. It's a nice outfit. Needs a bit of "labor of love" still.
Perhaps the artist's supervisor should speak up on why it's like that so we don't have to jump to conclusions anymore.
Because I really don't think he/she deserves this flak any longer.
Edit:typo
It’s not like we know who designed it and I’m assuming it wasn’t an artist’s decision but rather a modesty epic fail. If the costume was someone’s labor of love then I am sad for them that it was ruined like this. I know it’s work they’re getting paid for but still, I can imagine how I would feel.
2 million gold?! Maybe I should grind for this costume for resale... There doesn’t appear to be much one can spend these merits on anyway.2 -
Slyclone✭✭✭✭I just feel like it's half ass. Literally.
As much as I would love to work for a gaming company. Right now, in 2021, I'd much rather starve, then let the general public direct my work.
Funny how they almost feel proud that almost all decisions are final in the art department.
The worse is that they're almost a year ahead in production.
But 5 years behind on quality.That's it, that's all.0
