Argonians are however decent healers and decent tanks (decent - not good, but at least not bad).
Which race would you consider good healers then? Which race beats Argonian's 6% healing done?
The only race I can see being a competition to Argonians would be Bretons with their superior magicka sustain. Would that not make Argonians good, if not the best healers?
Being at least second best, can hardly be called 'not good'.
@Dracane Altmer, Dunmer and now probably even Orc beat Argonians in healing done with their 258 spell damage unless you reach quite a high spell damage value without that bonus already (which isn't that easy if you are expected to wear different sets to support your group) and Bretons beat them effortlessly at sustain, which is even more important for a healer.
A healer that is out of magicka, cannot keep the group alive and every second spent heavy attacking is a second not using another heal or reapplying another buff/debuff.
And then there is Khajiit who have more healing done through the bonus to critical healing on sets like Hollowfang that provide a bunch of crit and their sustain is not that much lower than Argonians, especially after the most recent nerf to the potion passive.
I'd say it currently looks something like this:
Healer ranking
- Breton (best)
- Khajiit/Altmer/Orc?/Dunmer (good)
- Argonian (decent)
- Imperial/Nord (niche)
- Redguard/Bosmer (bad)
So yeah, they are "decent", because they have buffs that benefit healers, but they are rather small compared to what other races provide.
The maths for this are129 spell damage breaks even with 4% healing done at 2500 spell damage. So 258 spell damage breaks even with 4% at 5000 spell damage and that divided by 1.5 makes 258 break even with Argonian's 6% at 3333 spell damage, which is quite high for a healer.Considering that running too many damage sets will hit the sustain of your group it's probably not worth giving up the flexibility of your group by trying to chase after Altmer/Dunmer rather than just accepting that Argonians are slightly weaker and being the most flexible you can be.
Based on this and the stats from my Breton healer, Argonians start being better than Altmer/Dunmer when you have Major and Minor Courage, Major and Minor Sorcery your weapon is golden and you have at least one or two spell damage boni on the sets you are wearing, depending on whether you are getting Major Courage from wearing Spell Power Cure (1) or Olorime (2) or the 2nd healer in the group applying it to you (2).
Martial Knowledge has 2 Spell damage boni, Z'en's has 1, Infallible Mage has 1, Roaring Opportunist has 1, Master Architect has 1. Jorvulds has 0!
The sets you can run are quite limited because Roaring Opportunist and Master Architect you are going to want to run together with Jorvulds which leaves you 1 spell damage bonus short and if you are on duty with applying Major Courage you are probably also going to want to run Jorvuld's. And then we need to consider that Martial Knowledge won't be easy to keep up if your own potion passive gives you too much stamina sustain from constantly drinking potions for Major Sorcery.
Like I said, they are decent healers. They just aren't the 2nd best choice.
Any race other than ork, altmer or dunmer.
But Argonians are the bottom. Still my main and half of my other chars are argonian. Don't understand why so many people hate lizards
Argonians are however decent healers and decent tanks (decent - not good, but at least not bad).
Which race would you consider good healers then? Which race beats Argonian's 6% healing done?
The only race I can see being a competition to Argonians would be Bretons with their superior magicka sustain. Would that not make Argonians good, if not the best healers?
Being at least second best, can hardly be called 'not good'.
@Dracane Altmer, Dunmer and now probably even Orc beat Argonians in healing done with their 258 spell damage unless you reach quite a high spell damage value without that bonus already (which isn't that easy if you are expected to wear different sets to support your group) and Bretons beat them effortlessly at sustain, which is even more important for a healer.
A healer that is out of magicka, cannot keep the group alive and every second spent heavy attacking is a second not using another heal or reapplying another buff/debuff.
And then there is Khajiit who have more healing done through the bonus to critical healing on sets like Hollowfang that provide a bunch of crit and their sustain is not that much lower than Argonians, especially after the most recent nerf to the potion passive.
I'd say it currently looks something like this:
Healer ranking
- Breton (best)
- Khajiit/Altmer/Orc?/Dunmer (good)
- Argonian (decent)
- Imperial/Nord (niche)
- Redguard/Bosmer (bad)
So yeah, they are "decent", because they have buffs that benefit healers, but they are rather small compared to what other races provide.
The maths for this are129 spell damage breaks even with 4% healing done at 2500 spell damage. So 258 spell damage breaks even with 4% at 5000 spell damage and that divided by 1.5 makes 258 break even with Argonian's 6% at 3333 spell damage, which is quite high for a healer.Considering that running too many damage sets will hit the sustain of your group it's probably not worth giving up the flexibility of your group by trying to chase after Altmer/Dunmer rather than just accepting that Argonians are slightly weaker and being the most flexible you can be.
Based on this and the stats from my Breton healer, Argonians start being better than Altmer/Dunmer when you have Major and Minor Courage, Major and Minor Sorcery your weapon is golden and you have at least one or two spell damage boni on the sets you are wearing, depending on whether you are getting Major Courage from wearing Spell Power Cure (1) or Olorime (2) or the 2nd healer in the group applying it to you (2).
Martial Knowledge has 2 Spell damage boni, Z'en's has 1, Infallible Mage has 1, Roaring Opportunist has 1, Master Architect has 1. Jorvulds has 0!
The sets you can run are quite limited because Roaring Opportunist and Master Architect you are going to want to run together with Jorvulds which leaves you 1 spell damage bonus short and if you are on duty with applying Major Courage you are probably also going to want to run Jorvuld's. And then we need to consider that Martial Knowledge won't be easy to keep up if your own potion passive gives you too much stamina sustain from constantly drinking potions for Major Sorcery.
Like I said, they are decent healers. They just aren't the 2nd best choice.
Nordic__Knights wrote: »WrathOfInnos wrote: »Argonian
fits right in with the healer role lol
Argonians were never healers by lore. Why? Because of SELF HEAL racial in skyrim?
Its just zos excuse to make them bad on purpose
Btw even breton, ORC and high elf are better healers ( while high elf is also better damage dealer, stamina race orc got flat spell damage bonus now which is much stronger than argonians heal % buff)
Argonians are however decent healers and decent tanks (decent - not good, but at least not bad).
Which race would you consider good healers then? Which race beats Argonian's 6% healing done?
The only race I can see being a competition to Argonians would be Bretons with their superior magicka sustain. Would that not make Argonians good, if not the best healers?
Being at least second best, can hardly be called 'not good'.
@Dracane Altmer, Dunmer and now probably even Orc beat Argonians in healing done with their 258 spell damage unless you reach quite a high spell damage value without that bonus already (which isn't that easy if you are expected to wear different sets to support your group) and Bretons beat them effortlessly at sustain, which is even more important for a healer.
A healer that is out of magicka, cannot keep the group alive and every second spent heavy attacking is a second not using another heal or reapplying another buff/debuff.
And then there is Khajiit who have more healing done through the bonus to critical healing on sets like Hollowfang that provide a bunch of crit and their sustain is not that much lower than Argonians, especially after the most recent nerf to the potion passive.
I'd say it currently looks something like this:
Healer ranking
- Breton (best)
- Khajiit/Altmer/Orc?/Dunmer (good)
- Argonian (decent)
- Imperial/Nord (niche)
- Redguard/Bosmer (bad)
So yeah, they are "decent", because they have buffs that benefit healers, but they are rather small compared to what other races provide.
The maths for this are129 spell damage breaks even with 4% healing done at 2500 spell damage. So 258 spell damage breaks even with 4% at 5000 spell damage and that divided by 1.5 makes 258 break even with Argonian's 6% at 3333 spell damage, which is quite high for a healer.Considering that running too many damage sets will hit the sustain of your group it's probably not worth giving up the flexibility of your group by trying to chase after Altmer/Dunmer rather than just accepting that Argonians are slightly weaker and being the most flexible you can be.
Based on this and the stats from my Breton healer, Argonians start being better than Altmer/Dunmer when you have Major and Minor Courage, Major and Minor Sorcery your weapon is golden and you have at least one or two spell damage boni on the sets you are wearing, depending on whether you are getting Major Courage from wearing Spell Power Cure (1) or Olorime (2) or the 2nd healer in the group applying it to you (2).
Martial Knowledge has 2 Spell damage boni, Z'en's has 1, Infallible Mage has 1, Roaring Opportunist has 1, Master Architect has 1. Jorvulds has 0!
The sets you can run are quite limited because Roaring Opportunist and Master Architect you are going to want to run together with Jorvulds which leaves you 1 spell damage bonus short and if you are on duty with applying Major Courage you are probably also going to want to run Jorvuld's. And then we need to consider that Martial Knowledge won't be easy to keep up if your own potion passive gives you too much stamina sustain from constantly drinking potions for Major Sorcery.
Like I said, they are decent healers. They just aren't the 2nd best choice.
You don't need high spell damage values as a healer in Pve, most heals are already quite generous, also everyone is getting 1k spell damage next patch for free, so reaching high spell damage on a healer will be much easier.
Also with the bump in our base stats, % modifiers also get stronger, since those will multiply higher base values.
So no, orcs and khajits won't make better healers than Argonians.
Breton sure, due to their higher sustain.
Currently in a bad shape are Argonian, Redguard, Bosmer and Khajiit (the later because of crit nerf, even specialized builds have less crit than before that has not been compensated by increased crit damage/healing, in general crit is quite useless in PVP and tanking as well).
I really all of them get fixed.
Argonians. I dont know why zos hate them
Maybe the devs are old school Dark Elves....they made argonians no better than pocket healers(handbags if you will. And discount ones at that)
But yes Argonian. After they nerfed resources, potion passive was popular. Block doesn't regenerate stamina so potion passive is popular for tanks(despite no extra stam/magicka resists and only 1k health). Argonian has gotten the shaft for awhile. I play them anyway(I think 6-7 of my 10 characters)
I have 10 characters, all argonians :P
phantasmalD wrote: »Argonians are however decent healers and decent tanks (decent - not good, but at least not bad).
Which race would you consider good healers then? Which race beats Argonian's 6% healing done?
The only race I can see being a competition to Argonians would be Bretons with their superior magicka sustain. Would that not make Argonians good, if not the best healers?
Being at least second best, can hardly be called 'not good'.
@Dracane Altmer, Dunmer and now probably even Orc beat Argonians in healing done with their 258 spell damage unless you reach quite a high spell damage value without that bonus already (which isn't that easy if you are expected to wear different sets to support your group) and Bretons beat them effortlessly at sustain, which is even more important for a healer.
A healer that is out of magicka, cannot keep the group alive and every second spent heavy attacking is a second not using another heal or reapplying another buff/debuff.
And then there is Khajiit who have more healing done through the bonus to critical healing on sets like Hollowfang that provide a bunch of crit and their sustain is not that much lower than Argonians, especially after the most recent nerf to the potion passive.
I'd say it currently looks something like this:
Healer ranking
- Breton (best)
- Khajiit/Altmer/Orc?/Dunmer (good)
- Argonian (decent)
- Imperial/Nord (niche)
- Redguard/Bosmer (bad)
So yeah, they are "decent", because they have buffs that benefit healers, but they are rather small compared to what other races provide.
The maths for this are129 spell damage breaks even with 4% healing done at 2500 spell damage. So 258 spell damage breaks even with 4% at 5000 spell damage and that divided by 1.5 makes 258 break even with Argonian's 6% at 3333 spell damage, which is quite high for a healer.Considering that running too many damage sets will hit the sustain of your group it's probably not worth giving up the flexibility of your group by trying to chase after Altmer/Dunmer rather than just accepting that Argonians are slightly weaker and being the most flexible you can be.
Based on this and the stats from my Breton healer, Argonians start being better than Altmer/Dunmer when you have Major and Minor Courage, Major and Minor Sorcery your weapon is golden and you have at least one or two spell damage boni on the sets you are wearing, depending on whether you are getting Major Courage from wearing Spell Power Cure (1) or Olorime (2) or the 2nd healer in the group applying it to you (2).
Martial Knowledge has 2 Spell damage boni, Z'en's has 1, Infallible Mage has 1, Roaring Opportunist has 1, Master Architect has 1. Jorvulds has 0!
The sets you can run are quite limited because Roaring Opportunist and Master Architect you are going to want to run together with Jorvulds which leaves you 1 spell damage bonus short and if you are on duty with applying Major Courage you are probably also going to want to run Jorvuld's. And then we need to consider that Martial Knowledge won't be easy to keep up if your own potion passive gives you too much stamina sustain from constantly drinking potions for Major Sorcery.
Like I said, they are decent healers. They just aren't the 2nd best choice.
You don't need high spell damage values as a healer in Pve, most heals are already quite generous, also everyone is getting 1k spell damage next patch for free, so reaching high spell damage on a healer will be much easier.
Also with the bump in our base stats, % modifiers also get stronger, since those will multiply higher base values.
So no, orcs and khajits won't make better healers than Argonians.
Breton sure, due to their higher sustain.
If you don't need high damage since "most heals are already quite generous" then why would you ever need heal done%?
Spell damage does more than just increases your healing output, it also amplifies your damage output (obviously). And exactly because over healing is a rampant issue, a race that has a more generally applicable passive will rank higher on the healer tier list.
Well they are all weak to some degree cause if the idea of the game is to play as you want and your a hard core minmaxer most races can only play certain roles in the game well. And that is were the problem lies even from a true lore perspective is every race should be able to be anything they train to be but when games have races with perks to play one way really well and not the other it defeats the purpose of having many racial options that are good at all things.
Also comparing ESO the there TES counter parts is laughable one is made to have many choices TES the other is a MMO ESO this is why so many can not play the races they want cause to many chase the MMO Meta which creates a major difference in the way you would normally play a real TES game. And those that say its not the Meta's Fault then you play the race you like and quit complaining yeah you might have flaws but you would in any TES game to but thats part of the choices we make when making characters they have flaws cause they are ether mag or stam or tank or healer they are flawed to play a certain way that makes them weaker by our own choices in Damage in Survival and in Support we all have our strengths as well but then we need a group to make up for our weakness we made to choice to play that way.
So which race is bad will depend on your choices and if you choose to be a meta chaser thats your fault knowing full well the meta is always hit the hardest with changes and you have to live with your choice to chase it. Others will have to take time to adjust and will with time some longer then others. But it will all work out in the END.
phantasmalD wrote: »Argonians are however decent healers and decent tanks (decent - not good, but at least not bad).
Which race would you consider good healers then? Which race beats Argonian's 6% healing done?
The only race I can see being a competition to Argonians would be Bretons with their superior magicka sustain. Would that not make Argonians good, if not the best healers?
Being at least second best, can hardly be called 'not good'.
@Dracane Altmer, Dunmer and now probably even Orc beat Argonians in healing done with their 258 spell damage unless you reach quite a high spell damage value without that bonus already (which isn't that easy if you are expected to wear different sets to support your group) and Bretons beat them effortlessly at sustain, which is even more important for a healer.
A healer that is out of magicka, cannot keep the group alive and every second spent heavy attacking is a second not using another heal or reapplying another buff/debuff.
And then there is Khajiit who have more healing done through the bonus to critical healing on sets like Hollowfang that provide a bunch of crit and their sustain is not that much lower than Argonians, especially after the most recent nerf to the potion passive.
I'd say it currently looks something like this:
Healer ranking
- Breton (best)
- Khajiit/Altmer/Orc?/Dunmer (good)
- Argonian (decent)
- Imperial/Nord (niche)
- Redguard/Bosmer (bad)
So yeah, they are "decent", because they have buffs that benefit healers, but they are rather small compared to what other races provide.
The maths for this are129 spell damage breaks even with 4% healing done at 2500 spell damage. So 258 spell damage breaks even with 4% at 5000 spell damage and that divided by 1.5 makes 258 break even with Argonian's 6% at 3333 spell damage, which is quite high for a healer.Considering that running too many damage sets will hit the sustain of your group it's probably not worth giving up the flexibility of your group by trying to chase after Altmer/Dunmer rather than just accepting that Argonians are slightly weaker and being the most flexible you can be.
Based on this and the stats from my Breton healer, Argonians start being better than Altmer/Dunmer when you have Major and Minor Courage, Major and Minor Sorcery your weapon is golden and you have at least one or two spell damage boni on the sets you are wearing, depending on whether you are getting Major Courage from wearing Spell Power Cure (1) or Olorime (2) or the 2nd healer in the group applying it to you (2).
Martial Knowledge has 2 Spell damage boni, Z'en's has 1, Infallible Mage has 1, Roaring Opportunist has 1, Master Architect has 1. Jorvulds has 0!
The sets you can run are quite limited because Roaring Opportunist and Master Architect you are going to want to run together with Jorvulds which leaves you 1 spell damage bonus short and if you are on duty with applying Major Courage you are probably also going to want to run Jorvuld's. And then we need to consider that Martial Knowledge won't be easy to keep up if your own potion passive gives you too much stamina sustain from constantly drinking potions for Major Sorcery.
Like I said, they are decent healers. They just aren't the 2nd best choice.
You don't need high spell damage values as a healer in Pve, most heals are already quite generous, also everyone is getting 1k spell damage next patch for free, so reaching high spell damage on a healer will be much easier.
Also with the bump in our base stats, % modifiers also get stronger, since those will multiply higher base values.
So no, orcs and khajits won't make better healers than Argonians.
Breton sure, due to their higher sustain.
If you don't need high damage since "most heals are already quite generous" then why would you ever need heal done%?
Spell damage does more than just increases your healing output, it also amplifies your damage output (obviously). And exactly because over healing is a rampant issue, a race that has a more generally applicable passive will rank higher on the healer tier list.
MashmalloMan wrote: »I like the Khajiit and Woodelf get some raw utility/damage related passives.
emilyhyoyeon wrote: »