account wide achievments and titles?

  • Olupajmibanan
    Olupajmibanan
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    CoronHR wrote: »
    i'm gonna say no. you didn't achieve that achievement or title on that character, so you shouldn't be able to show it off on that character.

    hats, costumes etc seem like an exception to the rule, but it makes sense that you could share a hat with another character, sort of like how you could loan an item of clothing to a friend, but you couldn't share a title with someone. a title has to be earned

    Why can you ride a Sunspire Champion Senche-Lion with a character even though you haven't earned the necessary achievement (Sunspire Dragonbreak) with that character?

    It just doesn't makes sense that I can use the achievement-locked mount with a character that hasn't earned the achievement but I cannot use the title from the very same achievement.

    And to oppose, I earned the achievement, not my character. I was the one spending hours learning the mechanics and training, not my character. I deserve the title!!!!! And I want to show MY title, so I should be able to display it on any of my characters because all my characters are me.
    Edited by Olupajmibanan on January 26, 2021 2:24PM
  • Sidonius
    Sidonius
    ✭✭✭
    I was the one spending hours learning the mechanics and training, not my character. I deserve the title!!!!! And I want to show MY title, so I should be able to display it on any of my characters because all my characters are me.
    And with that argument, every alt you create should start at your highest characters level CP 810+ or whichever in your case.

  • Olupajmibanan
    Olupajmibanan
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Sidonius wrote: »
    I was the one spending hours learning the mechanics and training, not my character. I deserve the title!!!!! And I want to show MY title, so I should be able to display it on any of my characters because all my characters are me.
    And with that argument, every alt you create should start at your highest characters level CP 810+ or whichever in your case.

    Actually, that is the situation right now to some extent. All new characters start with full CPs and can spend them and benefit from them even at lvl 1. Only item level is limited, but you are freed from the limitation after few hours (usually 3-4) of levelling from 1 to 50.

    After levelling to 50, you simply pull out gear of your bank you previously farmed on your max level character, then buy skill lines with gold you also previously earned on your max level character and you are free to go to a trial. All in one day.
    Edited by Olupajmibanan on January 26, 2021 2:40PM
  • tmbrinks
    tmbrinks
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sidonius wrote: »
    I was the one spending hours learning the mechanics and training, not my character. I deserve the title!!!!! And I want to show MY title, so I should be able to display it on any of my characters because all my characters are me.
    And with that argument, every alt you create should start at your highest characters level CP 810+ or whichever in your case.

    Actually, that is the situation right now to some extent. All new characters start with full CPs and can spend them and benefit from them even at lvl 1. Only item level is limited, but you are freed from the limitation after few hours (usually 3-4) of levelling from 1 to 50.

    After levelling to 50, you simply pull out gear of your bank you previously farmed on your max level character, then buy skill lines with gold you also previously earned on your max level character and you are free to go to a trial. All in one day.

    You can't buy skill lines with gold.... they're not giftable.

    Only purchasable with your own personal crowns.
    The Unshattered - Tenacious Dreamer - Hurricane Herald - Xalvakka's Scourge - Godslayer - Dawnbringer - Gryphon Heart - Tick Tock Tormenter - Immortal Redeemer - Dro-m'Athra Destroyer
    The Unchained - The Brilliant - Moth Trusted - The Just - Oathsworn - Bedlam's Disciple - Temporal Tempest - Curator's Champion - Fist of Tava - Invader's Bane - Land, Air, and Sea Supremacy - Zero Regrets - Battlespire's Best - Bastion Breaker - Ardent Bibliophile - Subterranean Smasher - Bane of Thorns - True Genius - In Defiance of Death - No Rest for the Wicked - Nature's Wrath - Undying Endurance - Relentless Raider - Depths Defier - Apex Predator - Pure Lunacy - Mountain God - Leave No Bone Unbroken - CoS/RoM/BF/FH Challenger
    71,345 achievement points
  • Tandor
    Tandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Personally, I'd prefer to have everything (including CPs and rare dyes etc) character-specific because all my characters are equal and individual rather than a main plus alts, but I don't lobby for that because I realise some players would prefer to have everything (including achievements and titles) account-wide and at the moment the game strikes a decent balance between those two approaches. It should maintain that balance in my view rather than swinging to one extreme or the other.
  • AlnilamE
    AlnilamE
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you want an overview on character select that shows you which achievements you have gotten across all characters, sure. Go ahead.

    But I still want to be able to get repeat achievements on alts and be able to see what they have and haven't completed by quickly looking at their achievement page, as I can do now.
    Fischblut wrote: »
    I love account-wide achivs and titles in GW2 - no matter what character I play, they all contribute to the same goal <3 I'm never punished if I'm not in the mood to play my main character there - every little alt becomes just as important.
    In fact, this allows me to change main characters at will; I barely play my original main character there nowadays, and my alt became my new main character few months ago :)

    I would absolutely love to have this in ESO too, and there is no reason to deny us this option. I really hope for it in future :)

    But achievements in GW2 are 1000x grindier than they are in ESO.

    If ESO went the way of GW2, they'd have to revamp achivements upwards by A LOT.

    Loot 1000 chests? LOL! Try 10,000.

    Kill 300 spriggans? Start at 3,000 and then we can talk (that will be level 1 of that achievement, there will be 5 tiers)

    All the vet dungeon achievements for killing mobs will be multiplied by at least 10.

    Sticker book will be added to the achievement list and you need to get all sets in a zone completed for an achievement for that zone.

    That's the kind of thing GW2 does. Do you REALLY want that in ESO?

    GW2 was designed from the beginning for account-wide achievements and the achievements reflect that. If ESO truly went account-wide and not just added an overview, like Kyoma's does, then they would have to revamp the achievements and make them a lot grindier.

    So you think getting the TRIFECTA achievements is going to be easier? They will add an achievement to get it with EACH CLASS. And then add an umbrella achievement for when you got it with all classes.


    joerginger wrote: »
    The developers really should take a look at Guild Wars 2 to see how this is done properly. When they're there, they could also try to find out what an "event" can be in contrast to the horribly dry "get slightly more loot" things that are named "event" in this game.

    The best thing about GW2 events is that they can be ignored. Though I'm dreading the Super Adventure Box, because we need music boxes for the guild hall. Ugh.

    The Moot Councillor
  • TwiceBornStar
    TwiceBornStar
    ✭✭✭✭
    Titles shouldn't be account wide. It's just a little reminder of what you've accomplished with that character, nothing more. It would be a bit weird to see a level one walking around with a Maelstrom Arena Champoin title, wouldn't it? You don't always have to show off to everyone, you know..

    Just my two cents!


  • Wolfpaw
    Wolfpaw
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Yes account wide everything.
  • Sidonius
    Sidonius
    ✭✭✭
    Now that I've had 24 hrs to think about it, I think account wide titles are fair, in fact you can buy half of the titles now anyway in the way of skill lines, vampire and werewolf, skyshards etc. What is the real problem of displaying titles earned .
  • Bat
    Bat
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    People who roll sorcs just to get Flawless Conqueror and Spirit Slayer do not deserve to have those titles on any other characters.

    Also, the rest of us deserve a damn break. Flameshaper starting shenanigans exactly when you have to turn your camera and focus to a void tether? End that nonsense. Make them incapable of shaping flames when tethers are up. Either the rest of us die from the tether, or from the flames. When that happens it is very unlikely to survive.

    Unless you're a sorc, of course, then you can just zip right through the tether like "lol". Because that's fair.

    No, those who rolled sorcs do not deserve their titles on any other characters.
  • Sirona_Starr
    Sirona_Starr
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd vote no on that if I could, the achievements on other characters is for me a large part of even playing that other character. If they became accountwide, and you completed them all, a HUGE motivation for playing another character vanishes.

    Besides, I'd feel it unjust wearing a title I earned on another character but the one that could do whatever the title included. Like wearing Flawless Conqueror , on a char that cant finish round 3 on regular MA... The cosmetics, even the armors and weapons earned, sure fair enough as someone said, you can always loan out your hat, but never an earned title.

    Isn't it a little unjust, then, to use the cp you earned on all characters? Shouldn't every character have their own, individual cp level? .... following your logic... Seems to me "unearned" cp on alts is a bigger issue than a title. Accountwide doesn't mean you couldn't earn the achievement more than once. They could set it up as recording how many times you got an achievement.
    Edited by Sirona_Starr on January 28, 2021 1:15PM
  • barney2525
    barney2525
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Ah, the monthly Achievement debate. Right on schedule. This is like, 5 years running now?

    It just boils down to perception. Either the Player is earning achievements or the Character is.

    And since the Player isn't gaining anything, its the Character that earns the Achievement. Why would a New Character carry a title of Master crafter? The examples are endless.

    Now, what make sense would be to have a Central tab that would keep track of all the Achievements each Character got, and
    could show the Player which Character has Which titles.

    IMHO
    :#
  • Sirona_Starr
    Sirona_Starr
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    barney2525 wrote: »
    Ah, the monthly Achievement debate. Right on schedule. This is like, 5 years running now?

    It just boils down to perception. Either the Player is earning achievements or the Character is.

    And since the Player isn't gaining anything, its the Character that earns the Achievement. Why would a New Character carry a title of Master crafter? The examples are endless.

    Now, what make sense would be to have a Central tab that would keep track of all the Achievements each Character got, and
    could show the Player which Character has Which titles.

    IMHO
    :#

    You are using unearned CP though. Why does a new character have access to unearned CP? Would you like that removed, so your argument is consistent?
  • F22nickell
    F22nickell
    ✭✭✭
    Add in the actual account-wide homeowner titles of "Lord," "Chancellor," "Clan Father" and "Count" (used male honorific simply for brevity) to the discussion, and it gets even grayer ...

    I mean ... my level 1 "Lord XYZ" leaving the starting area wearing scruffy clothes and a single 2h sword on his back makes just as much sense as the rest of the dividing lines here.

    Player vs. Character debate ... comes down to personal preference I guess.

    EDIT: I recant my example as the character can't get the title until they visit the estate, but that is a one-click teleport from the starting area.
    Edited by F22nickell on January 28, 2021 2:06PM
    Fix Wrothgar Relic Hunter for Pete's Sake! ... Until then ... ZOS=POS
  • barney2525
    barney2525
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    I don't Make the rules. I just play by them. Zos says CP are Account wide, so that's what I play by. Therefore, Every CP on my main Account HAS been earned. (my secondary has no character that has ever reached 50)

    I don't care if new characters did Not have access to CPs. It would end the ridiculous ' I can wipe out everything with no gear and no CPs ' and 'Overland is too easy ' nonsense. Every other game I play each character has to be developed from the ground up and no one complains about it.

    But I have a feeling that if, at this point, Zos made the change, and each Character had to earn their own CPs ... one or two or a million players might get upset.

    :#
  • UGotBenched91
    UGotBenched91
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would love this. I don’t understand why people are against it. Who cares if a character has a title next to their name? They may not have completed it with that specific character but they did complete it with a character on their account. There’s plenty more to be concerned about in this game then a title next to someone’s name.
  • UGotBenched91
    UGotBenched91
    ✭✭✭✭✭


    CoronHR wrote: »
    Sidonius wrote: »
    Wait.. so my lv5 alt could be a "Silencer" or "Librarian" or "Kingmaker" without having to collect a single book, visit Wrothgar or assassinate anybody?

    exactly. good point!

    yet my lvl1 can put on my VET HM NO DEATH SKIN LOL

    And? I don’t understand why this upsets people. The person unlocked the achievement with a character. Who cares if a title is on a lower character’s name?

  • AlnilamE
    AlnilamE
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd vote no on that if I could, the achievements on other characters is for me a large part of even playing that other character. If they became accountwide, and you completed them all, a HUGE motivation for playing another character vanishes.

    Besides, I'd feel it unjust wearing a title I earned on another character but the one that could do whatever the title included. Like wearing Flawless Conqueror , on a char that cant finish round 3 on regular MA... The cosmetics, even the armors and weapons earned, sure fair enough as someone said, you can always loan out your hat, but never an earned title.

    Isn't it a little unjust, then, to use the cp you earned on all characters? Shouldn't every character have their own, individual cp level? .... following your logic... Seems to me "unearned" cp on alts is a bigger issue than a title. Accountwide doesn't mean you couldn't earn the achievement more than once. They could set it up as recording how many times you got an achievement.

    I will start by saying that my characters only get to use CP when they get to level 50. When they are contributing towards the pool, they can earn them.

    I will also say that in the past, before CP, we had individual levels and I was fine with that.

    That said, the game (and every other MMO out there) has a balance of things that are character-based and things that are account-wide.

    Those are design decisions that inform other decisions, like the difficulty of achievements or the amount of time it takes to get to max CP. Games that have account-wide achievements tend to have achievements that are a lot grindier than the ones in ESO. So if ESO decides to go with account-wide achievements (as opposed to an overview of all character's achievements, but each characters still earns them separately), be prepared for the grind to be increased 10-fold at least.

    The Moot Councillor
Sign In or Register to comment.