No it's not, even if I bare it all the armour visually stays there anyway so def a bug.All joking aside, are you sure that's not just something that's supposed to be on the armor?
No it's not, even if I bare it all the armour visually stays there anyway so def a bug.All joking aside, are you sure that's not just something that's supposed to be on the armor?
Yes I'm European but I've never heard of that tradition! <Checks legs> Maybe a few here and there, not to bad tbh, just a few lonely ones - does that make me a hairy one then ?
No it's not, even if I bare it all the armour visually stays there anyway so def a bug.All joking aside, are you sure that's not just something that's supposed to be on the armor?
Yes I'm European but I've never heard of that tradition! <Checks legs> Maybe a few here and there, not to bad tbh, just a few lonely ones - does that make me a hairy one then ?
That looks like nord armor and the fur on the forearms comes from the cuirass.
The fact that the visual wont change even if you put on different armor is a whole different problem.
SeñorCinco wrote: »EDIT : Ahhh! the forearms and legs with the werewolf texture! At first, I thought that to be part of the armor.
Then, the joke is still on me. Aside from that being part of the armor, there is no excessive hair on that character.SeñorCinco wrote: »EDIT : Ahhh! the forearms and legs with the werewolf texture! At first, I thought that to be part of the armor.
It is.
I have to agree with this. If it only looked like it was a piece of armour it might be a cool look. As it is now, it looks more like she's actually got hairy body parts. It doesn't look like an armour at all.michaelpatrickjonesnub18_ESO wrote: »That's what Nord armour looks like.
Unfortunately, the graphics aren't as good as Skyrim, so the armour in this game looks painted on.
So the Nord Fur on your armour looks like it's part of her body.
It's just a cheap way to get the game to run better. For the console world.