Maintenance for the week of November 25:
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 25, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 7:00AM EST (12:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 25, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 7:00AM EST (12:00 UTC)
• Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
• PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – November 27, 6:00AM EST (11:00 UTC) - 9:00AM EST (14:00 UTC)
ww builds?
erio
✭✭✭✭✭
If you cant beat em, join em, and idea what wws run these days?
Edited by erio on July 24, 2020 5:05AM 1
-
Qbiken✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Sounds like low mmr pugstomping, hardly representative vs competent players in high mmr.4 -
DocFrost72✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Instead of throwing baseless nonsense at each other, could someone provide a video of what is going on with this so we can have a productive conversation, please?1 -
MurderMostFoul✭✭✭✭✭
✭
Not flaming, but what does that have to do with MMR?“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”0 -
erio✭✭✭✭✭DocFrost72 wrote: »Instead of throwing baseless nonsense at each other, could someone provide a video of what is going on with this so we can have a productive conversation, please?
Why show a video? Literally just some good wws running around and im trying to figure out what gear I should run on my ww?0 -
erio✭✭✭✭✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr0 -
MurderMostFoul✭✭✭✭✭
✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr
What does the 1000+CP have to do with MMR?“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”0 -
erio✭✭✭✭✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr
What does the 1000+CP have to do with MMR?
Do I really have to explain that too you? Think about it...1 -
Chrlynsch✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Showing a video would give us some visual cues to sets they could be wearing.Caius
Pack Leader of Scourge Alliance- First Fang of Hircine, The Beast of Bruma
PC NA0 -
MurderMostFoul✭✭✭✭✭
✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr
What does the 1000+CP have to do with MMR?
Do I really have to explain that too you? Think about it...
MMR is not determined by CP. Furthermore, MMR was fairly recently reset, so any "time-played" correlation has been mostly nullified. So, a lower CP player could have a high MMR and a high CP player could have a low MMR.
Think about it...“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”1 -
Fazuszek✭✭✭I recently leveled my new toon, by low lvl bg (below lvl 50) - and yes, werewolf almost in every match, sometimes even 2. Just to stomp newbiew.
But mostly (since they are in 90% twinks) they crap play - i usually put 2-3 DOTS on them, wait for heal to drop and execute from distance. Sometimes i use poisons.0 -
erio✭✭✭✭✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr
What does the 1000+CP have to do with MMR?
Do I really have to explain that too you? Think about it...
MMR is not determined by CP. Furthermore, MMR was fairly recently reset, so any "time-played" correlation has been mostly nullified. So, a lower CP player could have a high MMR and a high CP player could have a low MMR.
Think about it...
Who do you think is usually in the higher (didnt say highest, I said not low) mmr? Is it cp 300 players, or is it usually higher cp players? I never said it was: if cp in bg average = 810 then its high mrr. Jesus man. when im in a bg with literally a majority of cp 1000+ players, some of which I know by name, who are pvpers, i have a pretty good idea its not a low mrr bg. Think about it.0 -
MurderMostFoul✭✭✭✭✭
✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr
What does the 1000+CP have to do with MMR?
Do I really have to explain that too you? Think about it...
MMR is not determined by CP. Furthermore, MMR was fairly recently reset, so any "time-played" correlation has been mostly nullified. So, a lower CP player could have a high MMR and a high CP player could have a low MMR.
Think about it...
Who do you think is usually in the higher (didnt say highest, I said not low) mmr? Is it cp 300 players, or is it usually higher cp players? I never said it was: if cp in bg average = 810 then its high mrr. Jesus man. when im in a bg with literally a majority of cp 1000+ players, some of which I know by name, who are pvpers, i have a pretty good idea its not a low mrr bg. Think about it.
Being familiar the players, seeing them frequently as you play a lot, that is how you know its high MMR.
But there are plenty of CP810 players in the lowest MMR brackets, and numerous 400-700CP players in high MMR.Edited by MurderMostFoul on July 20, 2020 4:55PM“There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.”0 -
erio✭✭✭✭✭MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »MurderMostFoul wrote: »
Cause the dude was implying that the wws are only good in lowmmr, and I said that they're also decent in non-low mmr
What does the 1000+CP have to do with MMR?
Do I really have to explain that too you? Think about it...
MMR is not determined by CP. Furthermore, MMR was fairly recently reset, so any "time-played" correlation has been mostly nullified. So, a lower CP player could have a high MMR and a high CP player could have a low MMR.
Think about it...
Who do you think is usually in the higher (didnt say highest, I said not low) mmr? Is it cp 300 players, or is it usually higher cp players? I never said it was: if cp in bg average = 810 then its high mrr. Jesus man. when im in a bg with literally a majority of cp 1000+ players, some of which I know by name, who are pvpers, i have a pretty good idea its not a low mrr bg. Think about it.
Being familiar the players, seeing them frequently as you play a lot, that is how you know its high MMR.
But there are plenty of CP810 players in the lowest MMR brackets, and numerous 400-700CP players in high MMR.
Thats what I said...0