Maintenance for the week of January 5:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – January 7, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 10:00AM EST (15:00 UTC)
I think the AoE color change in the game settings should go away, because it gives a slight advantag
-
Sanguinor2✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »
I suppose you always worried about people with color impairments, and you still worry about them. In addition, in PvP, most players probably have color anomalies. In general, I understand.
No I wasnt Always worried About them. Does that mean that Im not allowed to say that taking away an Option that helps them have an experience even to mine is bad? I dont get your Point here.Politeness is respecting others.
Courage is doing what is fair.
Modesty is speaking of oneself without vanity.
Self control is keeping calm even when anger rises.
Sincerity is expressing oneself without concealing ones thoughts.
Honor is keeping ones word.2 -
Sanguinor2 wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »
I suppose you always worried about people with color impairments, and you still worry about them. In addition, in PvP, most players probably have color anomalies. In general, I understand.
No I wasnt Always worried About them. Does that mean that Im not allowed to say that taking away an Option that helps them have an experience even to mine is bad? I dont get your Point here.
Native animation displays AoE animation skills, sets, etc, with a pronounced red frame. If the color change function only changed the AoE border and the entire AoE animation remained native, there would be no questions. When you turn on the AoE color change function, you, in turn, color any AoE with different colors with a well-defined border.
Still, do you agree that this makes the AoE game less effective?Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on May 15, 2020 2:54PM0 -
VaranisArano✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »
I suppose you always worried about people with color impairments, and you still worry about them. In addition, in PvP, most players probably have color anomalies. In general, I understand.
No I wasnt Always worried About them. Does that mean that Im not allowed to say that taking away an Option that helps them have an experience even to mine is bad? I dont get your Point here.
Native animation displays AoE animation skills, sets, etc, with a pronounced red frame. If the color change function only changed the AoE border and the entire AoE animation remained native, there would be no questions. When you turn on the AoE color change function, you, in turn, color any AoE with different colors with a well-defined border.
Still, do you agree that this makes the AoE game less effective?
I think you mean that Red is the default setting.
ZOS now offers native support for all the colors on their color wheel.
Something that is non-native would require add-ons, which is not the case.Edited by VaranisArano on May 15, 2020 2:58PM0 -
VaranisArano wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »
I suppose you always worried about people with color impairments, and you still worry about them. In addition, in PvP, most players probably have color anomalies. In general, I understand.
No I wasnt Always worried About them. Does that mean that Im not allowed to say that taking away an Option that helps them have an experience even to mine is bad? I dont get your Point here.
Native animation displays AoE animation skills, sets, etc, with a pronounced red frame. If the color change function only changed the AoE border and the entire AoE animation remained native, there would be no questions. When you turn on the AoE color change function, you, in turn, color any AoE with different colors with a well-defined border.
Still, do you agree that this makes the AoE game less effective?
I think you mean that Red is the default setting.
ZOS now offers native support for all the colors on their color wheel.
Native AoE animation is a native AoE animation and no buts.0 -
kylewwefan✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭I don’t understand this line of thinking? Is this because the game is too easy or something? Lest make it harder for the colorblind? Uhm...1 -
VaranisArano✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »
I suppose you always worried about people with color impairments, and you still worry about them. In addition, in PvP, most players probably have color anomalies. In general, I understand.
No I wasnt Always worried About them. Does that mean that Im not allowed to say that taking away an Option that helps them have an experience even to mine is bad? I dont get your Point here.
Native animation displays AoE animation skills, sets, etc, with a pronounced red frame. If the color change function only changed the AoE border and the entire AoE animation remained native, there would be no questions. When you turn on the AoE color change function, you, in turn, color any AoE with different colors with a well-defined border.
Still, do you agree that this makes the AoE game less effective?
I think you mean that Red is the default setting.
ZOS now offers native support for all the colors on their color wheel.
Native AoE animation is a native AoE animation and no buts.
Native support means its a part of the base game, without needing additional plug-ins or addons to support it.
For example, Multicrafting is now natively supported by ESO, because ZOS added that functionality to the base game, expressly to make refining easier. It used to be an add-on that was not natively supported.
Likewise, color customization of AOEs is natively supported by ESO because it was added to the base game options with Horns of the Reach two years ago. It used to not be an option at all, with Red as the only color used. ZOS changed it expressly to make AOEs easier to see.
Both of those are now part of the base game of ESO as sold to new and existing players.
You keep saying "native," but you mean default or, perhaps, "classic."2 -
VaranisArano wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »Sanguinor2 wrote: »OrderoftheDarkness wrote: »
I suppose you always worried about people with color impairments, and you still worry about them. In addition, in PvP, most players probably have color anomalies. In general, I understand.
No I wasnt Always worried About them. Does that mean that Im not allowed to say that taking away an Option that helps them have an experience even to mine is bad? I dont get your Point here.
Native animation displays AoE animation skills, sets, etc, with a pronounced red frame. If the color change function only changed the AoE border and the entire AoE animation remained native, there would be no questions. When you turn on the AoE color change function, you, in turn, color any AoE with different colors with a well-defined border.
Still, do you agree that this makes the AoE game less effective?
I think you mean that Red is the default setting.
ZOS now offers native support for all the colors on their color wheel.
Native AoE animation is a native AoE animation and no buts.
Native support means its a part of the base game, without needing additional plug-ins or addons to support it.
For example, Multicrafting is now natively supported by ESO, because ZOS added that functionality to the base game, expressly to make refining easier. It used to be an add-on that was not natively supported.
Likewise, color customization of AOEs is natively supported by ESO because it was added to the base game options with Horns of the Reach two years ago. It used to not be an option at all, with Red as the only color used. ZOS changed it expressly to make AOEs easier to see.
Both of those are now part of the base game of ESO as sold to new and existing players.
You keep saying "native," but you mean default or, perhaps, "classic."
I do not argue with you this is the case, but this does not mean that the game AoE remains itself. Eso had add-ons that made it easier to play in PvP, so anything is possible. The battle team has changed, someone likes it, someone does not like it, but I think they are very smart when approaching balancing. Even if their opinion differs from mine.Edited by OrderoftheDarkness on May 15, 2020 3:18PM0 -
ZOS_VolpeadminGreetings,
Because this thread has derailed rather quickly with baiting and bashing commentary, we felt it was best to close it down.
Please be sure to keep our Community Rules in mind when posting on our forums.
Thank you for your understanding.The Elder Scrolls Online: Tamriel Unlimited - ZeniMax Online Studios
Forum Rules | Code of Conduct | Terms of Service | Home Page | Help Site0
This discussion has been closed.