



TheShadowScout wrote: »Okay, here is another for your mind-melting pleasure.
...or maybe its just another crazy conspiracy theory in the making?
You decide!
alanmatillab16_ESO wrote: »TheShadowScout wrote: »Okay, here is another for your mind-melting pleasure.
...or maybe its just another crazy conspiracy theory in the making?
You decide!
Except your theory goes out of the window with the phone. To get the "O" you would press the button 3 times so it would be 66666.
This is such a massive non-issue that I'm honestly befuddled.
Looks like OP didn't get enough attention on his first post that he had to duplicate it. Pretty funny, considering their username.
Thevampirenight wrote: »Yeah its kinda weird they use that number and maybe should change it to another one. 667 because of superstitions associated with it along with religious ones.
alanmatillab16_ESO wrote: »TheShadowScout wrote: »Okay, here is another for your mind-melting pleasure.
...or maybe its just another crazy conspiracy theory in the making?
You decide!
Except your theory goes out of the window with the phone. To get the "O" you would press the button 3 times so it would be 66666.
That's the young way of looking at it.
In the Olden Days, that function didn't exist on phones.
"Four" in general as I recall, because in many of those languages it has the same word as "death" I seem to remember, and is thus seen as "bad omen"... ('s why you never should give your asian friends presents in sets of four... thats kinda like subtly telling them "go die" or something I guess - at least that is what an asien gaming comrade once told me)Surprised no one has thrown in that 444 is also considered an unlucky number (Chinese and I believe some other Asian cultures).

This is such a massive non-issue that I'm honestly befuddled.
Looks like OP didn't get enough attention on his first post that he had to duplicate it. Pretty funny, considering their username.
Probably not an intentional double-post, though, given the time-stamps on both opening posts.
There is a bug in the forum software that very often causes a double post when starting a thread from a phone.
Thevampirenight wrote: »Yeah its kinda weird they use that number and maybe should change it to another one. 667 because of superstitions associated with it along with religious ones.
Do you have any idea how many numbers have "special meanings" around the world? I cringe just thinking about the review process that would have to go into place for each number to make sure that it was not "666", "19", "13", "17", "4", "9", "39", "69", "420"... and those are just the easy to find ones.