Avoiding spoilers...
If a certain person you let out of a certain thing for story reasons looks particularly hungry and ugly for it, why is it they look pretty again once fed?
Why do the test of us look ugly when fed?
Clearly feeding is still required.
Paradisius wrote: »Avoiding spoilers...
If a certain person you let out of a certain thing for story reasons looks particularly hungry and ugly for it, why is it they look pretty again once fed?
Why do the test of us look ugly when fed?
Clearly feeding is still required.
I believe the new vampire quest explains this (at least enough to call it passable). Because Lamae changed her strain through various sorcery and rituals, Noxophilic Sanguivoria requires feeding to get stronger, and Noxophilic Sanguivoria only (Until it gets retconned later in the series). This certain person may likely not have our strain of vampirism, making them exempt.
ZOS is really bending and twisting lore to try and make it so people behave like vampires where they have to feed, but right now the debuffs are so crazy people don't want to feed. They get the active abilities anyway so.... why bother?
As for appearances since they're going along with this whole crazy idea why do we look bloodstarved when we're fully fed? I don't mind looking monstrous after feeding but right now it looks as if someone drained all the liquid out of our bodies...
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »
Meanwhile the Vampire Lord form in Skyrim got stronger by Feeding as well.
TX12001rwb17_ESO wrote: »Meanwhile the Vampire Lord form in Skyrim got stronger by Feeding as well as well as all 11 Vampire Bloodlines in Daggerfall and the Berne, Quarra and Aundae Clans in Morrowind, and Rona Hassildor who fell into a Coma for not drinking blood in Oblivion, that whole starving thing was in only 1/2 half games, they should of never added that line and just pretended this is how it always worked.