First - The company needs to make money to pay and maintain their personal and servers.
Second - Is a house, a vanity, it will not help you beat other players neither increase your DPS.
No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
Well, the problem is both sided - on one side the company tries to prey on addictions - i dislike that - but on the other side, it is a personal problem of people as well, if they cannot control themselves to the point that they get addicted. Like i said nothing of that is required - you are as well not complaining about people driving a Ferrari irl - you don't think that you need it just because someone else might enjoy it. And if you are like this anyway, something is wrong with you, not with the Ferrari driver.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
Well, the problem is both sided - on one side the company tries to prey on addictions - i dislike that - but on the other side, it is a personal problem of people as well, if they cannot control themselves to the point that they get addicted. Like i said nothing of that is required - you are as well not complaining about people driving a Ferrari irl - you don't think that you need it just because someone else might enjoy it. And if you are like this anyway, something is wrong with you, not with the Ferrari driver.
That is why it is up to the community to put a stop to it. By making people not feel welcome for doing it. A business is not good or bad, it does what it needs to do to make money, and in the best way. If people are fueling it. We need to target them.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
Well, the problem is both sided - on one side the company tries to prey on addictions - i dislike that - but on the other side, it is a personal problem of people as well, if they cannot control themselves to the point that they get addicted. Like i said nothing of that is required - you are as well not complaining about people driving a Ferrari irl - you don't think that you need it just because someone else might enjoy it. And if you are like this anyway, something is wrong with you, not with the Ferrari driver.
That is why it is up to the community to put a stop to it. By making people not feel welcome for doing it. A business is not good or bad, it does what it needs to do to make money, and in the best way. If people are fueling it. We need to target them.
I find this quite offensive - making me a target just because I buy a crown only house with my subscription crowns. I have to do something with those - so why not buy a house with it - it comes with my subscription in a way.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »rager82b14_ESO wrote: »No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
Well, the problem is both sided - on one side the company tries to prey on addictions - i dislike that - but on the other side, it is a personal problem of people as well, if they cannot control themselves to the point that they get addicted. Like i said nothing of that is required - you are as well not complaining about people driving a Ferrari irl - you don't think that you need it just because someone else might enjoy it. And if you are like this anyway, something is wrong with you, not with the Ferrari driver.
That is why it is up to the community to put a stop to it. By making people not feel welcome for doing it. A business is not good or bad, it does what it needs to do to make money, and in the best way. If people are fueling it. We need to target them.
I find this quite offensive - making me a target just because I buy a crown only house with my subscription crowns. I have to do something with those - so why not buy a house with it - it comes with my subscription in a way.
I mean you can find it offensive, but you spent money on that cash shop knowing that they get people addicted through loot boxes. You ignored the corruption and turned a blind eye to it for your own enjoyment, and that help make the game worse for everyone else.
I'm at fault also, at one point in time I shrug and not cared what people did, but look at how bad things has become. The MMO community would be up in arms about a cash shop in a mmo. Yet, we are numb to it.
The game would be better without cash shop. If they made all the money through DLCS and such. The quality of the game would have went through the roof. Cash shop lets them be lazy.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »rager82b14_ESO wrote: »No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
Well, the problem is both sided - on one side the company tries to prey on addictions - i dislike that - but on the other side, it is a personal problem of people as well, if they cannot control themselves to the point that they get addicted. Like i said nothing of that is required - you are as well not complaining about people driving a Ferrari irl - you don't think that you need it just because someone else might enjoy it. And if you are like this anyway, something is wrong with you, not with the Ferrari driver.
That is why it is up to the community to put a stop to it. By making people not feel welcome for doing it. A business is not good or bad, it does what it needs to do to make money, and in the best way. If people are fueling it. We need to target them.
I find this quite offensive - making me a target just because I buy a crown only house with my subscription crowns. I have to do something with those - so why not buy a house with it - it comes with my subscription in a way.
I mean you can find it offensive, but you spent money on that cash shop knowing that they get people addicted through loot boxes. You ignored the corruption and turned a blind eye to it for your own enjoyment, and that help make the game worse for everyone else.
I'm at fault also, at one point in time I shrug and not cared what people did, but look at how bad things has become. The MMO community would be up in arms about a cash shop in a mmo. Yet, we are numb to it.
The game would be better without cash shop. If they made all the money through DLCS and such. The quality of the game would have went through the roof. Cash shop lets them be lazy.
No, I'm subscribing because I like it's features - and crowns come with it and i am using those - what else to do with those?-
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »rager82b14_ESO wrote: »rager82b14_ESO wrote: »No one needs that crown store stuff to play the game - it is totally optional. Who likes it and doesn't mind, buys it and enjoys it,and who doesn't want it, doesn't have to buy it. Why is that so hard to understand - nothing in the store is required.
While I agree with you, to some extent (as @rager82b14_ESO said, vanity is content, it's frustrating to see the coolest stuff with which to dress up your in-game alter ego constantly behind a paywall), you know what I could also do without? Game design decisions that have one purpose only, that purpose being driving store sales. If you think ESO design hasn't been affected by its monetisation model, and for the worse at that, I have a very nice bridge I want to sell you.
Well, the problem is both sided - on one side the company tries to prey on addictions - i dislike that - but on the other side, it is a personal problem of people as well, if they cannot control themselves to the point that they get addicted. Like i said nothing of that is required - you are as well not complaining about people driving a Ferrari irl - you don't think that you need it just because someone else might enjoy it. And if you are like this anyway, something is wrong with you, not with the Ferrari driver.
That is why it is up to the community to put a stop to it. By making people not feel welcome for doing it. A business is not good or bad, it does what it needs to do to make money, and in the best way. If people are fueling it. We need to target them.
I find this quite offensive - making me a target just because I buy a crown only house with my subscription crowns. I have to do something with those - so why not buy a house with it - it comes with my subscription in a way.
I mean you can find it offensive, but you spent money on that cash shop knowing that they get people addicted through loot boxes. You ignored the corruption and turned a blind eye to it for your own enjoyment, and that help make the game worse for everyone else.
I'm at fault also, at one point in time I shrug and not cared what people did, but look at how bad things has become. The MMO community would be up in arms about a cash shop in a mmo. Yet, we are numb to it.
The game would be better without cash shop. If they made all the money through DLCS and such. The quality of the game would have went through the roof. Cash shop lets them be lazy.
No, I'm subscribing because I like it's features - and crowns come with it and i am using those - what else to do with those?-
I mean sure, if that is all you done. That is fine, notice how I said people who pay into the cash shop.
Many of the mmos coming out broke the rumors that you even need a sub fee to keep servers up.
My problems with ESO is. Not only do they overcharge for DLC with questionable content amount for price they ask for, but a sub fee along with a cash shop and a loot box to go with it.
Sub fee, I'm cool with..just not with it and a cash shop.
I think it's best not to 'target' anyone for anything you disagree with, tbh, but I think making the Crown Store items more abundant, cheaper and available to more players would be great for everyone.
If you're not interested in cosmetics, it's not a problem for you, and that's fine. But a lot of mmo players DO like cosmetic items, and maybe would be even happier to play the game, and spend more money on it. Win! \o/
Btw, if cosmetic items weren't that important why would mmos have cosmetics in cash shops at all? Waste of precious resources, surely.
I wish more cosmetic items were available from within the game (I know there are some but I'd like there to be more and a wider variety) and I think the cash shop should be generally a bit cheaper, with more stuff, to appeal to more people. Don't mind if there's a Giant Gold Castle on sale for £3000 if someone is likely to buy it, but not to the exclusion of all the other stuff less wealthy players might like.
Stuff for everyone, and money for ZOS.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »I think it's best not to 'target' anyone for anything you disagree with, tbh, but I think making the Crown Store items more abundant, cheaper and available to more players would be great for everyone.
If you're not interested in cosmetics, it's not a problem for you, and that's fine. But a lot of mmo players DO like cosmetic items, and maybe would be even happier to play the game, and spend more money on it. Win! \o/
Btw, if cosmetic items weren't that important why would mmos have cosmetics in cash shops at all? Waste of precious resources, surely.
I wish more cosmetic items were available from within the game (I know there are some but I'd like there to be more and a wider variety) and I think the cash shop should be generally a bit cheaper, with more stuff, to appeal to more people. Don't mind if there's a Giant Gold Castle on sale for £3000 if someone is likely to buy it, but not to the exclusion of all the other stuff less wealthy players might like.
Stuff for everyone, and money for ZOS.
We are long passed the time for that.
Look, a few years ago I agree with you, but things have got so bad in gaming that we are trying to get the GOV to step in to stop them, at a certain point we need to take a step back and say, well a company is going to do this because people buy into it. We only got ourselves to blame for letting it get this bad.
rager82b14_ESO wrote: »I think it's best not to 'target' anyone for anything you disagree with, tbh, but I think making the Crown Store items more abundant, cheaper and available to more players would be great for everyone.
If you're not interested in cosmetics, it's not a problem for you, and that's fine. But a lot of mmo players DO like cosmetic items, and maybe would be even happier to play the game, and spend more money on it. Win! \o/
Btw, if cosmetic items weren't that important why would mmos have cosmetics in cash shops at all? Waste of precious resources, surely.
I wish more cosmetic items were available from within the game (I know there are some but I'd like there to be more and a wider variety) and I think the cash shop should be generally a bit cheaper, with more stuff, to appeal to more people. Don't mind if there's a Giant Gold Castle on sale for £3000 if someone is likely to buy it, but not to the exclusion of all the other stuff less wealthy players might like.
Stuff for everyone, and money for ZOS.
We are long passed the time for that.
Look, a few years ago I agree with you, but things have got so bad in gaming that we are trying to get the GOV to step in to stop them, at a certain point we need to take a step back and say, well a company is going to do this because people buy into it. We only got ourselves to blame for letting it get this bad.
We are long passed the time for that.
Look, a few years ago I agree with you, but things have got so bad in gaming that we are trying to get the GOV to step in to stop them, at a certain point we need to take a step back and say, well a company is going to do this because people buy into it. We only got ourselves to blame for letting it get this bad.
I absolutely agree with you in lots of ways, but...as you rightly say, that ship has sailed, so perhaps it's good to make the best of a bad situation.
I'm not fond of absolute statements because they come back to bite you in the bum, but I reckon the chances of the Crown Store going away are zero to none. However, that doesn't mean things can't be improved to please a wider set of the player base.
I think it's a bit rubbish that the people who want cosmetic items aren't given more chance to 'earn' them (people seem very keen on other players 'earning' things) but if the cash shop is here to stay, make it generally less annoying. Cheaper, no stupid boxes, no stupid gems, and a bigger variety of things to buy.
Trust me, I lost years of my life through unhealthy rage when cash shops started appearing in my fave mmos, but some systems are better than others, and i think it's ok to persuade/cajole/lobby ZOS to improve the ESO one.
But trying to get rid of the Crown Store will just make you sad and cross I think. I do really sympathise though.
Brandathorbel wrote: »Yes people buy but what Zos doesn't seem to understand by lowering the price they will probably make more money by selling many many more houses.
then the more people with houses, the more subs get renewed and the more people are in the housing system which means more money with furniture packs and crown furniture.
People keep saying this. Thing is large companies usually have an entire department that researches these things and they are usually good at determining a price point that generates the most profit. If their research showed lower prices would generate more profits the change would be made.
Do they?