You are mistaken on what War Maiden actually affects. It does not give flat spell damage increase. It only works on skills that deal generic non-elemental magic damage. So it doesn't work for any flame/shock/ice skill like WoE and staff light/heavy attacks
BSW on the other hand gives true spell damage and works for all magicka skills. It outperforms War Maiden unless more than 70-80% of your damage is non-elemental magic damage which pretty much never happens.
kypranb14_ESO wrote: »Probably also worth noting that Restoration Staff Light attacks are all Magic Damage, and therefore buffed by War Maiden.
KingJeffery wrote: »https://elderscrollsonline.wiki.fextralife.com/Elemental+Blockade was the wiki I was referring to:
Updated: 12 Feb 2019 01:47
You should reflect on your bias.
Via the https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Online:Wall_of_Elements
Magic Damage: Flame Damage • Frost Damage • Shock Damage
I'm unsure as to why the tooltip would say magic damage and then not be "magic damage" based on the staff.... Its effect is pretty clear. I am not misunderstanding the diction here. It is clearly stated as magic damage.
I understand LA damage in conjunction with skills. What I do not understand is the relevance of it in this post. Is there some hidden mechanic with BSW and War Maidens and the SD that I am missing?
Edit: I understand this now. the spell damage buffs the staff damage in addition to other types of damage, correct? Therefore, the BSW SD increase is actually a universal damage/healing increase as opposed to the specific damage type. What youre saying is that the overall increase is significant and the static 400 SD is not applicable overall. Thank you- this makes a difference in perspective.
Its a matter of why is BSW gospel? (Answered)
The argument for the burning damage cannot be made either (an additional effect from the five set bonus from BSW) as many abilities and fire enchants give this effect.
happyhughes2001 wrote: »Would War Maiden be any good on a Magplar? Most of the Templar class skills are magic damage I think?
happyhughes2001 wrote: »Thanks for replying.
PVE.
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »MagPlar is probably about the only class that WM is particularly good on because their entire class kit is Magic Damage.
That said, it wouldn't buff your Light Attack or Blockade.
I've never really understood the fascination with BSW, to be honest. It seems leftover from an earlier era when high Spell Damage was harder to come by but 2/3 uptime on classes that don't natively do Flame Damage (so you're relying on Blockade and LA to proc) seems like a waste compared to other options.
On a magPlar, give me Scathing Mage (using Jabs as spammable) over WM any day and give me both of them over BSW.
If you're talking PvP, then WM is much more intriguing since you're not using Blockade and there's greater value of always-on (or at least controllable proc) damage buffs.
You are mistaken on what War Maiden actually affects. It does not give flat spell damage increase. It only works on skills that deal generic non-elemental magic damage. So it doesn't work for any flame/shock/ice skill like WoE and staff light/heavy attacks
BSW on the other hand gives true spell damage and works for all magicka skills. It outperforms War Maiden unless more than 70-80% of your damage is non-elemental magic damage which pretty much never happens.
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »MagPlar is probably about the only class that WM is particularly good on because their entire class kit is Magic Damage.
That said, it wouldn't buff your Light Attack or Blockade.
I've never really understood the fascination with BSW, to be honest. It seems leftover from an earlier era when high Spell Damage was harder to come by but 2/3 uptime on classes that don't natively do Flame Damage (so you're relying on Blockade and LA to proc) seems like a waste compared to other options.
On a magPlar, give me Scathing Mage (using Jabs as spammable) over WM any day and give me both of them over BSW.
If you're talking PvP, then WM is much more intriguing since you're not using Blockade and there's greater value of always-on (or at least controllable proc) damage buffs.
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »MagPlar is probably about the only class that WM is particularly good on because their entire class kit is Magic Damage.
That said, it wouldn't buff your Light Attack or Blockade.
I've never really understood the fascination with BSW, to be honest. It seems leftover from an earlier era when high Spell Damage was harder to come by but 2/3 uptime on classes that don't natively do Flame Damage (so you're relying on Blockade and LA to proc) seems like a waste compared to other options.
On a magPlar, give me Scathing Mage (using Jabs as spammable) over WM any day and give me both of them over BSW.
If you're talking PvP, then WM is much more intriguing since you're not using Blockade and there's greater value of always-on (or at least controllable proc) damage buffs.
Flame enchant, burning and Vampire's Bane are also flame damage and can proc BSW.
JumpmanLane wrote: »You are mistaken on what War Maiden actually affects. It does not give flat spell damage increase. It only works on skills that deal generic non-elemental magic damage. So it doesn't work for any flame/shock/ice skill like WoE and staff light/heavy attacks
BSW on the other hand gives true spell damage and works for all magicka skills. It outperforms War Maiden unless more than 70-80% of your damage is non-elemental magic damage which pretty much never happens.
Nah I checked it. 71% flame damage 15% frost damage the rest mag damage on my MagDk. 93% up time on SUCCESSION. (Farm Maelstrom Lol).
YandereGirlfriend wrote: »JumpmanLane wrote: »You are mistaken on what War Maiden actually affects. It does not give flat spell damage increase. It only works on skills that deal generic non-elemental magic damage. So it doesn't work for any flame/shock/ice skill like WoE and staff light/heavy attacks
BSW on the other hand gives true spell damage and works for all magicka skills. It outperforms War Maiden unless more than 70-80% of your damage is non-elemental magic damage which pretty much never happens.
Nah I checked it. 71% flame damage 15% frost damage the rest mag damage on my MagDk. 93% up time on SUCCESSION. (Farm Maelstrom Lol).
I avoided Succession for so long due to not wanting to have to farm Maelstrom and not fully understanding the insanely high uptimes that you can get with certain classes.
But I sucked it up and farmed it for my Necro and DK and have been loving it ever since.
Of course that parse with Elf Bane and Draugrkin from a few days ago has me excited about that set on my DK as well.
Grianasteri wrote: »Ive used War Maiden on my Magblade (pve), since every single damaging skill is magic damage (on my build). Only in those circumstances I think one can consider War Maiden of real use. I certainly have no complaints on my Magblade.
WrathOfInnos wrote: »Grianasteri wrote: »Ive used War Maiden on my Magblade (pve), since every single damaging skill is magic damage (on my build). Only in those circumstances I think one can consider War Maiden of real use. I certainly have no complaints on my Magblade.
I can’t comment on your build specifically, but typically just Light Attacks and Wall/Blockade are enough Fire damage to make even basic sets like Julianos outperform War Maiden.
Wall of elements un morphed I believe does magic damage. but you always morph things.
Grianasteri wrote: »WrathOfInnos wrote: »Grianasteri wrote: »Ive used War Maiden on my Magblade (pve), since every single damaging skill is magic damage (on my build). Only in those circumstances I think one can consider War Maiden of real use. I certainly have no complaints on my Magblade.
I can’t comment on your build specifically, but typically just Light Attacks and Wall/Blockade are enough Fire damage to make even basic sets like Julianos outperform War Maiden.
Id have to see the parsing analysis. LA are perhaps 20%, while Wall of Elements is actually a flex slot, so not necessarily in use on my build... when it is, its the only non magic damage ability.
So potentially we have 400 magic spell damage (for 80% of my damage output), +129 spell damage, +1 crit and +1 max mag... vs... 300 spell damage (for 100% of my damage output), +2 crit, +1 max mag.
To me it seems its probably quite close in these circumstances, particularly in real game world scenarios as opposed to dummy parsing. I dont mind openly admitting WM is on my Magblade because I had a set laying around, and I noted that everything my Magblade was doing, was indeed magica damage... this saved me crafting yet another Julianos set or going after an appropriate trial set to pair with Mothers Sorrow... for now... its a work in progress