pompusnord wrote: »Anotherone773 wrote: »pompusnord wrote: »That's a terrbile design choice. I do not talk to quest givers in a new area I go into. A tutorial for Cyrodiil does not belong on an NPC in the form of a quest because a player has the possibility of skipping it due to their play style. Not wanting to pick up a quest such as myself becomes a problem there is nothing denoting it's an actual tutorial. People are acting like everyone must pick up every quest and cannot see how easily important things can be missed due to different people playing differently. Not everyone is going to talk to every quest giver they see for various reasons. and to act like someone is supposed to and it's their fault for missing the tutorial is dumb. It's the devs fault I missed the tutorial. and not because I didn't talk to an NPC quest giver. The game designer should deign the game with this type of situation and not from the I assume stance.There is a help section in the game, there might be some info for pvp. Cyrodiil tutorial quest giver is first npc who you see when you arrive in Cyrodiil.
The tutorial for Cyrodiil requires a player to actually know it's there (Which it doesn't) A real tutorial would be as follows, as soon as you enter Cyrodiil, the game freezes and a big pop up comes in the middle of the screen telling the player THIS IS THE TUTORIAL. and you cannot skip it until you go through it.
This crap of placing things in game with assumptions and things a player can easily miss because the game designer didn't bother talking into account someone who plays the game the way I do.. is just a really bad design..
In fact I bet that if i do go back into Cyrodiil and talked to every NPC there is I still wouldn't have a clue as to the tutorial.
So i can see from all of your posts here and what little sense i was able to make out of them, that we are not qualified to help you. I have thus decided to provide you with a link that i think might be able to help you. Simply click here.
I'll sum it up then
Everyone who plays this game and on this forum full well knows that, this game has no instructions. .
Siohwenoeht wrote: »I'm certain @Raisin just won the thread. Lol
pompusnord wrote: »Anotherone773 wrote: »pompusnord wrote: »That's a terrbile design choice. I do not talk to quest givers in a new area I go into. A tutorial for Cyrodiil does not belong on an NPC in the form of a quest because a player has the possibility of skipping it due to their play style. Not wanting to pick up a quest such as myself becomes a problem there is nothing denoting it's an actual tutorial. People are acting like everyone must pick up every quest and cannot see how easily important things can be missed due to different people playing differently. Not everyone is going to talk to every quest giver they see for various reasons. and to act like someone is supposed to and it's their fault for missing the tutorial is dumb. It's the devs fault I missed the tutorial. and not because I didn't talk to an NPC quest giver. The game designer should deign the game with this type of situation and not from the I assume stance.There is a help section in the game, there might be some info for pvp. Cyrodiil tutorial quest giver is first npc who you see when you arrive in Cyrodiil.
The tutorial for Cyrodiil requires a player to actually know it's there (Which it doesn't) A real tutorial would be as follows, as soon as you enter Cyrodiil, the game freezes and a big pop up comes in the middle of the screen telling the player THIS IS THE TUTORIAL. and you cannot skip it until you go through it.
This crap of placing things in game with assumptions and things a player can easily miss because the game designer didn't bother talking into account someone who plays the game the way I do.. is just a really bad design..
In fact I bet that if i do go back into Cyrodiil and talked to every NPC there is I still wouldn't have a clue as to the tutorial.
[Removed Quote].
I'll sum it up then
Everyone who plays this game and on this forum full well knows that, this game has no instructions. Everyone also knows it's put together in such a manor that makes it impossible to play for a new person. Anyone who thinks putting an actual tutorial on an NPC in the forum of a quest, is a good idea is a fool, and proves they don't understand why doing that is a bad idea
People who don't always talk to NPC's are going to miss important information (Such as what happened to me). But even still this situation shows that even knowing the NPC is the tutorial won't help. When a game designer knows there are people who won't talk to all NPC's, but disregards that play style, doesn't know what they're doing..The proper way to design a game is take into account all play styles, then program the game around that.
Again I am going to go back into the game and Cyrodiil and see this so called NPC. I am willing to bet the tutorial is bad and reflects the mistake of putting the tutorial in the form of a quest on an NPC. I could be wrong, but I don't think I am.
No they aren't. What is not required is missing. Since you still seem to be having an issue understanding the problem I'll just say this:Except the first reply to your post I linked you instructions for what seemed to be what you were talking about. Those are official instructions in the help/support section of the ESO website.
pompusnord wrote: »No they aren't. What is not required is missing. Since you still seem to be having an issue understanding the problem I'll just say this:Except the first reply to your post I linked you instructions for what seemed to be what you were talking about. Those are official instructions in the help/support section of the ESO website.
What is listed in the PTS is DLC ok, DLC requires either ESO + or to buy it, since it's not out yet then that leaves ESO+ which literally 99% of all the players have. That means If ESO + was in fact needed, Zenimax would never have to post ESO + being a requirement to participate in this PTS, just because they would assume that because it's DLC then it's common sense that people access it had ESO +.
Furthermore, if all the players accessing it had ESO+ then no one would ever ask if ESO + is needed because no one would ever run into that problem.
Summed up, game devs design things to 99% of the player base, and since 99% of the player base has ESO+ then why would they not have access to the PTS through ESO+ and then never have to post it as one of the requirements.
Understand the issue now?
pompusnord wrote: »No they aren't. What is not required is missing. Since you still seem to be having an issue understanding the problem I'll just say this:Except the first reply to your post I linked you instructions for what seemed to be what you were talking about. Those are official instructions in the help/support section of the ESO website.
What is listed in the PTS is DLC ok, DLC requires either ESO + or to buy it, since it's not out yet then that leaves ESO+ which literally 99% of all the players have. That means If ESO + was in fact needed, Zenimax would never have to post ESO + being a requirement to participate in this PTS, just because they would assume that because it's DLC then it's common sense that people access it had ESO +.
Furthermore, if all the players accessing it had ESO+ then no one would ever ask if ESO + is needed because no one would ever run into that problem.
Summed up, game devs design things to 99% of the player base, and since 99% of the player base has ESO+ then why would they not have access to the PTS through ESO+ and then never have to post it as one of the requirements.
Understand the issue now?
Salix_alba wrote: »also when in the pts you can buy a test version of dlc with crowns since everything in the pts crown store is like 1 crown
pompusnord wrote: »Salix_alba wrote: »also when in the pts you can buy a test version of dlc with crowns since everything in the pts crown store is like 1 crown
So ESO + is in fact needed in order to access the PTS. a bunch of people are saying it's not, now here you are saying it is? Well which is it?
For everyone arguing this. ESO + is a requirement needed to get into the PTS it's what I asked to begin with.
Except it's not listed as a requirement, yet it's still needed.
pompusnord wrote: »Salix_alba wrote: »also when in the pts you can buy a test version of dlc with crowns since everything in the pts crown store is like 1 crown
So ESO + is in fact needed in order to access the PTS. a bunch of people are saying it's not, now here you are saying it is? Well which is it?
For everyone arguing this. ESO + is a requirement needed to get into the PTS it's what I asked to begin with.
Except it's not listed as a requirement, yet it's still needed.
Spartabunny08 wrote: »Abnur Tharn: "Brilliant. Why is it that the people with the most ridiculous ideas are always the ones who are most certain of them?"
Couldn't resist lmao
Hippie4927 wrote: »I've seen a lot of crazy stuff on this forum but this one leaves me speechless!!
pompusnord wrote: »Hippie4927 wrote: »I've seen a lot of crazy stuff on this forum but this one leaves me speechless!!
So someone making it a point to show how uneducated gamers have become now to the point they cannot distinguish a game from massive college research that teat classify them as one in the same, so when anyone has a question and they do not go with teh rest of the uneducated gamers somehow the person asking is the problem.
A game isn't school, stop passing it off as such
This new forum character seems very familiar...
pompusnord wrote: »Hippie4927 wrote: »I've seen a lot of crazy stuff on this forum but this one leaves me speechless!!
So someone making it a point to show how uneducated gamers have become now to the point they cannot distinguish a game from massive college research that teat classify them as one in the same, so when anyone has a question and they do not go with teh rest of the uneducated gamers somehow the person asking is the problem.
A game isn't school, stop passing it off as such
pompusnord wrote: »Hippie4927 wrote: »I've seen a lot of crazy stuff on this forum but this one leaves me speechless!!
So someone making it a point to show how uneducated gamers have become now to the point they cannot distinguish a game from massive college research that teat classify them as one in the same, so when anyone has a question and they do not go with teh rest of the uneducated gamers somehow the person asking is the problem.
A game isn't school, stop passing it off as such