BaiterOfZergs wrote: »These stuff sounds too fishy to be true, especially after reading the jabs part.
ZeroAlmanic wrote: »In alot of Pvp band chats I'm in these notes have been flying around everywhere the past 48 hours can anyone who data mines confirm these? If these are true it looks like PvP is going to high damage meta againhope this is true something new.
So next patch (supposedly) flame lash will have an execute, so when powerlash is procced it’ll deal x damage and heal as intended but now it’ll scale the damage depending on someone’s missing health, both dk leaps will set enemy off balance for 8 seconds after the stun and apply minor defile for 3 seconds depending on the morph and have a 63% damage increase, engulfing flames no longer scales with spell damage and will apply a more aggressive aoe and increase all flame damage by 23%. Jabs (any morph) will no longer stun the enemy but the 3rd consecutive jab will have increased damage based on missing health and crescent sweep will cost 120 ultimate but will have a 63% damage increase, bone colossus will no longer apply manor vulnerability only till the enemy is hit on the final blow, graveyard will have a 35% damage increase and apply defile to anyone in the aoe for 3 seconds after synergie is activated, incap (both morphs) will have a 32% damage increase and will now heal you for 100% of the damage caused, lotus fan will get a 32% damage increase and the bow will get a 24% damage nerf, sorcs basically have a damage increase of all skills from 23% all the way up to 63% and the atro ulti now apples minor maim and minor defile for 3 seconds while active, warden beetles gets a 32% damage increase and vines get a 43% healing buff, perma frost will apply minor defile while active and will get a 42% damage increase
BaiterOfZergs wrote: »These stuff sounds too fishy to be true, especially after reading the jabs part.
Agreed, jabs hardly needs an execute!
witchdoctor wrote: »Thus it begins.
As the Shadow of the Expansion grows, so too will the rumour.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »Just to make this clear, DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL IT IS PATCH NOTES
colossalvoids wrote: »Half the changes have zero sense even from zos standpoint so can't view it as legit.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »Just to make this clear, DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL IT IS PATCH NOTES
People were saying the same thing last time when the potes were leaked in August. And everyone was also saying that those are crazy and can't be true...
Funny how that turned out.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »ManwithBeard9 wrote: »Just to make this clear, DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL IT IS PATCH NOTES
People were saying the same thing last time when the potes were leaked in August. And everyone was also saying that those are crazy and can't be true...
Funny how that turned out.
Yes, I'm aware. And when the patch notes are released and if they match these, then do what you wish. But as I said in my previous post, expect ZOS to end all work with the Class Rep program because the people they bring in, if true, can't be trusted.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »ManwithBeard9 wrote: »Just to make this clear, DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL IT IS PATCH NOTES
People were saying the same thing last time when the potes were leaked in August. And everyone was also saying that those are crazy and can't be true...
Funny how that turned out.
Yes, I'm aware. And when the patch notes are released and if they match these, then do what you wish. But as I said in my previous post, expect ZOS to end all work with the Class Rep program because the people they bring in, if true, can't be trusted.
I think the program was pretty much dead after the first leak already. Last time we heard anything about it was when the update list of reps was announced after the whole debacle. Not a peek since.
I agree that being skeptical about any leak is a good idea but there is nothing too crazy in the list OP has posted so it's either a cleverly done fake or this might indeed be real. We already have a precedent.
Sanguinor2 wrote: »
I think the program was pretty much dead after the first leak already. Last time we heard anything about it was when the update list of reps was announced after the whole debacle. Not a peek since.
I agree that being skeptical about any leak is a good idea but there is nothing too crazy in the list OP has posted so it's either a cleverly done fake or this might indeed be real. We already have a precedent.
There is one inconsistency. Jabs (either Morph) isnt the Name of the base ability, which would likely appear if it was a universal Change and more importantly neither of These Morphs actually stuns since many years so there is no stun to take away which apparently happens next patch.
The post is paraphrased so using "jabs" seems pretty normal to me. Nice catch on the stun inconsistency though.
Sanguinor2 wrote: »
Sanguinor2 wrote: »
I doubt Wheeler is the guy to write patch notes or any other pre-release version of them.
Might be something the person doing the fake has overlooked. Might be just a text mistake that could've crawled in at any point between OP starting this thread and people sharing rumours through Discord based on some initial post. Too many variables to make a good guess one way or another.
ManwithBeard9 wrote: »Believe nothing until it's patch notes. But if these do come true, I'm guessing they'll shut down the program where they give certain players better access to Dev notes and what not. This would be the second (third?) time patch notes and what not were leaked before they were finalized and released. NDAs exist for a reason.
Definitely fake. Those notes make no sense.ManwithBeard9 wrote: »ManwithBeard9 wrote: »Just to make this clear, DO NOT BELIEVE ANYTHING UNTIL IT IS PATCH NOTES
People were saying the same thing last time when the potes were leaked in August. And everyone was also saying that those are crazy and can't be true...
Funny how that turned out.
Yes, I'm aware. And when the patch notes are released and if they match these, then do what you wish. But as I said in my previous post, expect ZOS to end all work with the Class Rep program because the people they bring in, if true, can't be trusted.
I argued with them in their tier lists thread about rankings. Supposedly stamblade is top tier along with stamwarden, I argued it was stamtemplar and Magsorc. They also had DK mid-low across the board. They might just not know any better.