Maybe some people don't trust healers.....
Not gunna lie I've probably given people some healer trust issues...you run far ahead of my heals all the time, sry you die. If constantly stood in aoe, sry you die.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »
SpiderKnight wrote: »
For PvP resto back-bar is pretty much bis for magic users.could be PvPers or hybrids. Also there isn't that much dps loss when using resto back. Asuming we not talk about Likos parses, for most content you can use resto with no problems.
SpiderKnight wrote: »
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »SpiderKnight wrote: »
Lightning staves are not an effective DPS weapon because the increase aoe damage by 8% as opposed to inferno which increases single target damage. Surely that's not changed on whatever platform you play on? In addition concussion and off balance is as consistent as burning.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »SpiderKnight wrote: »
Lightning staves are not an effective DPS weapon because the increase aoe damage by 8% as opposed to inferno which increases single target damage. Surely that's not changed on whatever platform you play on? In addition concussion and off balance is as consistent as burning.
markulrich1966 wrote: »TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »SpiderKnight wrote: »
Lightning staves are not an effective DPS weapon because the increase aoe damage by 8% as opposed to inferno which increases single target damage. Surely that's not changed on whatever platform you play on? In addition concussion and off balance is as consistent as burning.
energized increases shock damage by 5% (sorc passive). So a sorc benefits from AOE as well increased damage using lightning.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »markulrich1966 wrote: »TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »SpiderKnight wrote: »
Lightning staves are not an effective DPS weapon because the increase aoe damage by 8% as opposed to inferno which increases single target damage. Surely that's not changed on whatever platform you play on? In addition concussion and off balance is as consistent as burning.
energized increases shock damage by 5% (sorc passive). So a sorc benefits from AOE as well increased damage using lightning.
Actually not really. The percentage of your DPS that comes from lightning abilities is quite low. Even on a sorc. Light attacks which do benefit from the 8% inferno buff are your single biggest source of damage. And I'm not here to talk about whether you should run a lightning staff on a DPS or not. The point of this thread is to hear from people that use restos In trials, and dungeons and other PVE activities.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »SpiderKnight wrote: »
Lightning staves are not an effective DPS weapon because the increase aoe damage by 8% as opposed to inferno which increases single target damage. Surely that's not changed on whatever platform you play on? In addition concussion and off balance is not as consistent as burning.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »This is genuinely baffling. What could compel you to do something like that? There are no skills that deal damage under the Resto skill line. What could possibly make you think that this is a good idea? I could somewhat understand being tricked into believing that lightning staves are for DPS because of them being destros. But not restos. Come on
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »I could somewhat understand being tricked into believing that lightning staves are for DPS because of them being destros. But not restos. Come on
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »SpiderKnight wrote: »
Lightning staves are not an effective DPS weapon because the increase aoe damage by 8% as opposed to inferno which increases single target damage. Surely that's not changed on whatever platform you play on? In addition concussion and off balance is not as consistent as burning.
TheGreatBlackBear wrote: »This is genuinely baffling. What could compel you to do something like that? There are no skills that deal damage under the Resto skill line. What could possibly make you think that this is a good idea? I could somewhat understand being tricked into believing that lightning staves are for DPS because of them being destros. But not restos. Come on